Literature DB >> 30177111

Usefulness of the Impulse Oscillometry System in Graft Function Monitoring in Lung Transplant Recipients.

M Ochman1, J Wojarski2, A Wiórek2, W Slezak2, M Maruszewski2, W Karolak2, P Przybyłowski3, Ł Krzych4, S Zeglen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After successful lung transplantation, patients are monitored for chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Pulmonary function tests and 6-minute-walk tests are commonly used for functional graft monitoring. As these methods require substantial effort, however, many patients are unable to complete testing fully. The impulse oscillometry system is a noninvasive method that requires minimal patient cooperation and is suitable for use for patients incapable of strenuous activity. We compared impulse oscillometry system with pulmonary function tests and 6-minute-walk tests to determine if impulse oscillometry system could serve as a substitute measure.
METHODS: This prospective, observational study evaluated 25 consecutive patients (19 men, median age 54.5 years) admitted to a single institution from January to October 2016 (double-lung = 13, single-lung = 13). Patients were assessed using pulmonary function tests, impulse oscillometry system, and 6-minute-walk tests.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent of patients reached high-resonance frequency (Fres) and, in 84% of patients, the value of Ax (area of reactance) increased above the norm (N < 0.33 kPa/L) indicating peripheral airways obstruction. High resistance of small airways, measured with an R5 - R20 difference, followed higher Ax values. The increase of resistance at 5 Hz in 31% of patients (R5 >150% predicted value) also indicated small airway obstruction. Airway obturation in patients with elevated Ax and R5 was confirmed by decreased FEV1 (<75% predictive value) and FEV1/FVC ratio in 38% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Study results confirm the impulse oscillometry system method could be a substitute for pulmonary function tests in determining the occurrence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. 6-minute-walk tests showed neither strong correlations regarding impulse oscillometry system and pulmonary function tests nor any base for differentiation of results regarding main factor codes.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30177111     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.12.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  3 in total

Review 1.  Lung Function Assessment by Impulse Oscillometry in Adults.

Authors:  Noemi Porojan-Suppini; Ovidiu Fira-Mladinescu; Monica Marc; Emanuela Tudorache; Cristian Oancea
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 2.  Oscillometry of the respiratory system: a translational opportunity not to be missed.

Authors:  Lennart K A Lundblad; Annette Robichaud
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 5.464

3.  Lung function monitoring in the era of respiratory pandemics.

Authors:  Lennart K A Lundblad; Chung-Wai Chow
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.121

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.