Literature DB >> 30176985

Cost of vascular access devices in public hospitals in Queensland.

Haitham W Tuffaha1, Nicole Marsh2, Joshua Byrnes3, Nicole Gavin2, Joan Webster2, Marie Cooke4, Claire M Rickard2.   

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to quantify the utilisation of vascular access devices in Queensland public hospitals and their associated cost. Methods Devices were broadly classified into peripheral intravenous catheters, central venous catheters and arterial lines. The number of catheters used was obtained from a central procurement department at Queensland Health and validated using Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) claims and/or hospital data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare for the same period. Resources consumed included equipment and staff time required to insert and remove catheters. Equipment costs were valued using negotiated hospital prices, and staff time was valued at the fixed industrial award wages in Australia or relevant MBS fees. Device maintenance costs (e.g. dressings) and costs of treating complications were excluded. Results Approximately 2.75million vascular access devices were used in public hospitals in Queensland in 2016, at a total cost of A$59.14million. This comprised a total equipment cost of around A$10.17million and a total labour cost of A$48.85million Conclusion Vascular access is an important component of healthcare expenditure. The present study is the first to characterise and cost vascular access devices in Queensland. Further research is needed on the costs of maintaining device function and of treating complications associated with vascular access. What is known about the topic? The cost of vascular access in Australia has previously been estimated from modelling, using various assumptions, or based on device utilisation in other countries. What does this paper add? For the first time, device utilisation for vascular access in Queensland has been quantified and costed. Results were obtained from reliable sources and validated against other databases. What are the implications for practitioners? Practitioners and managers may now provide accurate estimates about the cost of catheter failure, a potentially preventable problem that affects up to 50% of all catheters placed. Attaching costs to such failure may also stimulate research into how to reduce the problem.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30176985     DOI: 10.1071/AH18102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Health Rev        ISSN: 0156-5788            Impact factor:   1.990


  5 in total

1.  Securing jugular central venous access devices with dressings fixed to a liquid adhesive in an intensive care unit population: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  India Pearse; Amanda Corley; Emily N Larsen; Claire M Rickard; Robert S Ware; Jill Campbell; Fiona Coyer; Evan Alexandrou; Catherine O'Brien; Nicole Marsh
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.728

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of bundled innovative devices versus standard approach in the prevention of unscheduled peripheral venous catheters removal due to complications in France.

Authors:  Franck Maunoury; Bertrand Drugeon; Matthieu Boisson; Nicolas Marjanovic; Raphael Couvreur; Olivier Mimoz; Jeremy Guenezan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Incidence of peripheral intravenous catheter failure among inpatients: variability between microbiological data and clinical signs and symptoms.

Authors:  Ian Blanco-Mavillard; Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Calero; Joan de Pedro-Gómez; Gaizka Parra-García; Ismael Fernández-Fernández; Enrique Castro-Sánchez
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.887

4.  Improving peripheral venous cannula insertion in children: a mixed methods study to develop the DIVA key.

Authors:  Jessica A Schults; Tricia M Kleidon; Victoria Gibson; Robert S Ware; Emily Monteagle; Rebecca Paterson; Karina Charles; Adam Keys; Craig A McBride; Steven McTaggart; Benjamin Lawton; Fiona Macfarlane; Chloe Sells; Claire M Rickard; Amanda J Ullman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Mapping progress in intravascular catheter quality surveillance: An Australian case study of electronic medical record data linkage.

Authors:  Jessica A Schults; Daner L Ball; Clair Sullivan; Nick Rossow; Gillian Ray-Barruel; Rachel M Walker; Bela Stantic; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.