Literature DB >> 30176364

Fertility Outcome after Cornual Resection for Interstitial Pregnancies.

Rune Svenningsen1, Anne Cathrine Staff2, Anton Langebrekke3, Erik Qvigstad2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate future pregnancy rates beyond gestational week 24 after cornual resections for interstitial pregnancies, subsequent modes of delivery, and the rate of later uterine ruptures.
DESIGN: A single-center historic cohort with follow-up registry data (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: Department of Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. PATIENTS: Forty consecutive women with interstitial ectopic pregnancies were treated in the study period from 2005 to 2016, 33 of whom were treated with laparoscopic cornual resection (3 converted to laparotomy). Twenty-six of the 33 women were presumed still fertile after treatment (cases) and thereby age and parity matched with a reference group of 52 women with an equal follow-up time having undergone salpingectomy for tubal (noninterstitial) ectopic pregnancies (controls) (ratio 1:2). Subsequent fertility data for both groups were retrieved from medical records and the national Medical Birth Registry of Norway.
INTERVENTIONS: None, data extracted from the patients' medical records and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of interstitial pregnancies among the ectopic pregnancies was 3%. The median time to follow-up for cases and controls was 76 and 71 months, respectively. Subsequent pregnancy rates beyond gestational week 24 were equal in both groups (46% [cases] and 54% [controls]). Cesarean delivery in subsequent pregnancies was more common among women having undergone cornual resections (60% vs 18%, p = .006). Only 2 subsequent uterine ruptures were encountered.
CONCLUSION: Cornual resection as treatment for interstitial pregnancies seems to have no added detrimental effect on subsequent pregnancy rates compared with salpingectomy for noninterstitial tubal ectopic pregnancies. However, they more often lead to elective cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies.
Copyright © 2018 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cornual; Ectopic; Fertility; Interstitial; Pregnancy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30176364     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  4 in total

1.  Diagnosis pitfall of interstitial pregnancy: a case report of a term pregnancy with abnormal placentation.

Authors:  Fatemeh Sadat Najib; Homeira Vafaei; Amin Abolhasan Foroughi; Niloofar Namazi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Interstitial Pregnancy: Case Report of Atypical Ectopic Pregnancy.

Authors:  Lucas Tadeu Rocha Santos; Sebastião Carlos de Sousa Oliveira; Liana Gonçalves Aragão Rocha; Nathaniel Dos Santos Sousa; Rosenildo de Sousa Figueiredo
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-05-13

3.  Use of Laparoscopic Slip Knot with Purse-String Suture in Surgical Management of Unruptured Heterotopic Interstitial Pregnancies.

Authors:  Ruilin Lei; Jinxiao Liang; Xiaoting Ling; Jing Xu; Sihua Liang; Hui Zhou; Bingzhong Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-01-01

4.  Effect of previous wedge resection for interstitial pregnancy on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles of IVF/ICSI: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Shengluan Tang; Tong Du; Jialyu Huang; Hongjuan Ye; Ming Zhao; Jiaying Lin; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.211

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.