Marco Di Fraia1, Stefania Arasi1,2,3, Sveva Castelli1, Stephanie Dramburg1, Ekaterina Potapova1, Danilo Villalta4, Salvatore Tripodi5, Ifigenia Sfika5, Anna Maria Zicari6, Valeria Villella5, Serena Perna1, Alessandro Travaglini7, Pier Luigi Verardo8, Paolo Maria Matricardi1. 1. Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Messina, Messina, Italy. 3. Division of Allergy, University Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Hospital Bambino Gesù, Rome, Vatican City, Italy. 4. Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, S.Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Messina, Italy. 5. Pediatric Allergy Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy. 6. Department of Pediatrics and Child Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. 7. Department of Biology, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy. 8. Aerobiology Centre, Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell'Ambiente del Friuli Venezia Giulia, Palmanova, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The identification of the primary sensitizing pollen is difficult in Southern European patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) if sensitized to various pollen sources with overlapping seasonality. A more precise diagnosis is obtained by IgE assays to allergen molecules, currently available as singleplex or microarrays. OBJECTIVES: To test the analytical performance of a multi-parameter immunoblot molecular "Pollen Test" specifically designed to test IgE antibodies to pollen extracts and molecules clinically relevant in Southern Europe. METHODS: Sera were obtained from 101 children and 98 adults with SAR and tested with a customized multiplex immunoblot assay (EUROLINE Southern European Pollen Profile [ESEP]; EUROIMMUN AG, Luebeck, Germany) containing a comprehensive panel of allergen extracts and molecules. ESEP's outcomes were then compared in selected sera (ESEP positive to negative = 2:1) with those of singleplex IgE assays (ImmunoCAP; ThermoFisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden). For each of the examined reagents, qualitative (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy), semi-quantitative (classes) and quantitative (Spearman's rank correlation, Bland-Altmann plots) comparisons were performed. RESULTS: Compared to ImmunoCAP, cumulative ESEP's sensitivity and specificity were 87% (95% CI 84%-90%) and 88% (83%-93%) for extracts and 99% (98%-100%) and 87% (83%-91%) for molecules. Cohen's kappa coefficients (κC ) ranged for extracts from 0.18 (Pellitory) to 0.50 (Cypress) and for molecules from 0.21 (Ole e 1) to 0.68 (Phl p 7). The quantitative outcomes of the two diagnostic tests were highly correlated, with Spearman's rank correlation coefficients always exceeding 0.80. Bland-Altmann plots showed a tendency of ESEP to overestimate serum specific IgE levels, when compared to ImmunoCAP. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Sensitivity and specificity of ESEP in testing serum IgE antibodies against pollen allergen extracts and molecules, in Italian patients with SAR, both exceeded 85%. The advantages and limitations of a multiplex customized immunoblot assay, in the routine clinical use of molecular diagnostics in Southern European pollen allergic patients, deserve to be tested.
BACKGROUND: The identification of the primary sensitizing pollen is difficult in Southern European patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) if sensitized to various pollen sources with overlapping seasonality. A more precise diagnosis is obtained by IgE assays to allergen molecules, currently available as singleplex or microarrays. OBJECTIVES: To test the analytical performance of a multi-parameter immunoblot molecular "Pollen Test" specifically designed to test IgE antibodies to pollen extracts and molecules clinically relevant in Southern Europe. METHODS: Sera were obtained from 101 children and 98 adults with SAR and tested with a customized multiplex immunoblot assay (EUROLINE Southern European Pollen Profile [ESEP]; EUROIMMUN AG, Luebeck, Germany) containing a comprehensive panel of allergen extracts and molecules. ESEP's outcomes were then compared in selected sera (ESEP positive to negative = 2:1) with those of singleplex IgE assays (ImmunoCAP; ThermoFisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden). For each of the examined reagents, qualitative (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy), semi-quantitative (classes) and quantitative (Spearman's rank correlation, Bland-Altmann plots) comparisons were performed. RESULTS: Compared to ImmunoCAP, cumulative ESEP's sensitivity and specificity were 87% (95% CI 84%-90%) and 88% (83%-93%) for extracts and 99% (98%-100%) and 87% (83%-91%) for molecules. Cohen's kappa coefficients (κC ) ranged for extracts from 0.18 (Pellitory) to 0.50 (Cypress) and for molecules from 0.21 (Ole e 1) to 0.68 (Phl p 7). The quantitative outcomes of the two diagnostic tests were highly correlated, with Spearman's rank correlation coefficients always exceeding 0.80. Bland-Altmann plots showed a tendency of ESEP to overestimate serum specific IgE levels, when compared to ImmunoCAP. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Sensitivity and specificity of ESEP in testing serum IgE antibodies against pollen allergen extracts and molecules, in Italian patients with SAR, both exceeded 85%. The advantages and limitations of a multiplex customized immunoblot assay, in the routine clinical use of molecular diagnostics in Southern European pollen allergicpatients, deserve to be tested.
Authors: Erminia Ridolo; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Francesco Pucciarini; Elena Makri; Giovanni Paoletti; Giorgio Walter Canonica Journal: Clin Mol Allergy Date: 2022-08-10
Authors: Jarmila Čelakovská; Josef Bukač; Eva Cermákova; Radka Vaňková; Hana Skalská; Jan Krejsek; Ctirad Andrýs Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 5.923