Literature DB >> 30175983

The Role of TMEM230 Gene in Parkinson's Disease.

Hao Deng1,2, Kuan Fan1,3, Joseph Jankovic4.   

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease whose pathogenesis remains unknown. TMEM230 gene, encoding a transmembrane protein in secretory and recycling vesicle, has been recently identified as a novel disease-causing gene of autosomal dominant PD with Lewy pathology and typical clinical symptoms. Although its mutation and variants seem to be rare in PD patients, functional studies have indicated that TMEM230 protein probably plays an important role in secretory and recycling pathway and may be involved in Lewy pathological mechanism. Here we summarize current genetic and functional reports about TMEM230 and focus on its relation with PD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics; Lewy bodies; Parkinson’s disease; TMEM230

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30175983      PMCID: PMC6218139          DOI: 10.3233/JPD-181421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis        ISSN: 1877-7171            Impact factor:   5.568


INTRODUCTION

Parkinson’s disease (PD) (OMIM 168600) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s disease (AD), with incidence rate of 0.014% per year in total population and 0.16% per year in people over the age of 65 in high-income countries [1]. The typical clinical symptoms of PD include progressive bradykinesia in combination with rest tremor, rigidity, postural instability, and numerous non-motor symptoms [2, 3]. The loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) and the Lewy pathology including Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites have been identified as pathological features of PD [2]. PD was once thought to be a nongenetic disease and mainly caused by environmental factors, but as a result of advances in genetic research, this notion has gradually changed and there is growing recognition of genetic mechanisms in the pathogenesis of the disease [4]. To date, at least 23 disease-causing loci and 19 genes have been reported in monogenic PD pedigree, though the list of risk-associated genes is steadily growing [3, 5]. PD is now viewed as a complex neurodegenerative disorder resulting from genetic, environmental and other, yet unknown factors [4]. Unlike sporadic PD which accounts for about 90% of total PD cases, a considerable number of patients with monogenic form of PD have been found to have young-onset of symptoms, atypical clinical features, and lack Lewy pathology [1, 6, 7]. Only a few of PD causing mutations had been reported to be related to clinically typical PD with Lewy pathology [6]. Recently, Deng et al. reported that transmembrane protein 230 gene (TMEM230), may play a pathogenic role in a rare autosomal dominant PD (ADPD) with typical motor features and Lewy body pathology [8]. This finding provides new insights into the pathogenesis of PD-related neurodegeneration. The primary aim of this article is to review current genetic and functional data about TMEM230 and suggest how the discovery of this disease-causing gene can lead to pathogenesis-targeted therapy for PD.

PARK21 AND THE TMEM230 GENE

In 2014, a large Canadian Mennonite family with a PD phenotype was reported with c.2564A > G (p.N855S) variant in the DNAJC13 gene, located on chromosome 3q22 [9]. But this variant did not fully cosegregate with the disease as demonstrated by its presence in one unaffected individual died at the age of 87 years and absence in two PD cases and one parkinsonism case with progressive supranuclear palsy pathology, who belong to different branches and couldn’t be explained as sporadic cases because extremely low possibility (<10- 3) [8]. The causal gene locus was termed as PARK21 (OMIM 616361) in Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) according to the chronology of identification of the disease-causing gene loci. However, in 2016, Deng and colleagues proposed that TMEM230 c.422G > T (p.R141L) mutation, mapped to chromosome 20p13-p12.3, was the pathogenic mutation of PD in the same family with 13 available patients [8]. Though a TMEM230 mutation–freed patient with atypical parkinsonism phenotype which was still mild after 23 years of disease progression was evidenced, the TMEM230 mutation was the best genetic explanation for PD in this family under current known data, which may be explained by other conditions such as environmental or inconsistent genetic factors [10, 11]. The Canadian Mennonite family of mixed European ancestry included 14 enrolled family members with ADPD, mean age at onset of 67.0 years, and typical presentation of late-onset, levodopa-responsive PD [8, 12]. These patients had rigidity, bradykinesia, and rest tremor (in 57% patients), and dementia was present in 21% of cases [13]. Additionally, neuronal loss in substantia nigra and nucleus basalis, and Lewy bodies were found in brainstem at autopsies including α-synuclein stains, performed in three of cases [10, 13]. The TMEM230 gene, also called as chromosome 20 open reading frame 30 (C20orf30), covers a genomic region of about 13.2 kb with five exons [14]. TMEM230 mRNA expression is high in many tissues, including several regions of nervous system, such as midbrain, cerebellum, neocortex and spinal cord [8, 15]. Its four mRNA transcriptional variants encode two protein isoforms: the isoform-1 of 183 amino acids and the isoform-2 of 120 amino acids [8]. The isoform-2 accounts for more than 95% of total protein isoforms in humans, and presents alone in species spanning zebrafish to most mammals [8]. The highly conserved amino acid sequence of isoform-2 contains two transmembrane segments, with N-terminal and C-terminal regions exposing to the cytosol [8]. There is no other known protein with sequence identical or similar to TMEM230.

TMEM230 VARIANTS IDENTIFIED IN PD

Three other PD-associated TMEM230 variants, including two variants (p.Y92C and p.*184Wext*5) which were found through analyzing 832 North American PD cases and one variant (p.*184PGext*5) which were detected by 9 PD cases of 7 families from China were reported in original Deng et al.’s study [8]. The asymptomatic carriers with p.Y92C and p.*184PGext*5 variants suggested incomplete penetrance, similar to LRRK2 p.G2019S variant [8, 16]. Subsequently, two novel variants p.G16W and p.M64V, and six known missense variants including p.Y106H (rs746223968), p.I162V (rs368707598), p.R68H (rs780460399), p.Y165C (rs758033952), p.M1? (rs768390203) and p.A110T were detected only in PD patients [17-22], though many other studies failed to find PD-related pathogenic variant in TMEM230 gene (Table 1) [23-31]. Because of these variants only observed in PD patients, and the incompletion of population genetic databases (e.g., ExAC and gnomAD) caused by the age-dependent and incomplete penetrance of the disorder, these variants probably exert a disease-causing or susceptibility role of PD. In 15 studies published, approximately 0.28% PD patients were found to harbor potential PD-related variants with full detection information of coding regions of the TMEM230 gene (Table 1) [8, 17–30]. Interestingly, most of the PD-related mutations and variants of TMEM230 gene detected to date were in the highly conserved sequence of isoform-2, and about half of these were in the regions around two transmembrane segments of this protein. This suggests that abnormal function of transmembrane segments in TMEM230 protein plays an important role in neurodegeneration (Fig. 1). Additionally, non-coding variants c.*746G > A (rs45610034), c.68 + 182G > A (rs149865687) and c.*161C > T were reported to be associated with PD risk or age at onset, though none of them passed the Bonferroni correction test and a large sample size will be needed to confirm the association [27, 31].
Table 1

Mutation/variants associated with PD detected in coding region of the TMEM230 gene

ReportGeographic distribution/Ethnic backgroundNumber of patients with PD [controls]Detection regionNucleotide change detectedLocationAmino acid changeZygosityFrequency in casesMAF (ExAC)MAF (gnomAD)
Deng et al. 2016 [8]Canada1 PD familyExomec.422G > TExon 5p.R141LHet12/138.963×10−6 (European Non-Finnish)
Northern America433 FPD and 399 SPD [1238]Coding regionsc.551A > GExon 5p.*184Wext*5Het1/433 in FPD
China225 FPD and 349 SPD [528]Coding regionsc.550_552del TAGins CCCGGGExon 5p.*184PGext*55 Hom and 4 Het9/225 in FPD
Giri et al. 2017 [17]Caucasian1450 PD [2267]Exomec.316T > CExon 4p.Y106HHet1/14501.501×10−5 (European Non-Finnish)1.798×10−5 (European Non-Finnish)
c.484A > GExon 5p.I162VHet1/14501.578×10−5 (European Non-Finnish)
Caucasian86 FPD [10]Exome
Baumann et al. 2017 [18]Europe53 PD casesExomec.203G > AExon 3p.R68HHet1/534.548×10−5 (European Non-Finnish)5.541×10−5 (European Non-Finnish)
Quadri et al. 2017 [19]Taiwan98 FPD and 717 SPD [417]Exon 5c.494A > GExon 5p.Y165CHet1/717 in SPD1.156×10−4 (East Asian)2.319×10−4 (East Asian)
Dutch31 FPD and 59 SPDExon 5
Caucasian266 PD probandsCoding regionsc.1A > GExon 1p.M1?Het1/2267.06×10−5 (Total)1.056×10−4 (European Non-Finnish)
Yang et al. 2017 [20]Southwestern China11 FPD and 355 SPDExons and exon-intron boundariesc.46G > TExon 1p.G16WHet1/355 in SPD
c.328G > AExon 4p.A110THet2/355 in SPD1.444×10−5 (Total)
Wei et al. 2018 [21]Southwestern China120 FPD [650]Exons and exon-intron boundariesc.46G > TExon 1p.G16WHet1/120
Tejera-Parrado et al. 2018 [22]Southern Spanish148 FPD and 555 SPD [695]Exons and exon-intron boundariesc.190A > GExon 3p.M64V1/703
Yan et al. 2017 [23]China192 FPD and 1043 SPD [1252]Exons and exon-intron boundaries0/1235
Wu et al. 2017 [24]Eastern China122 PD probandsCoding regions0/122
Fan et al. 2017 [25]Taiwan180 FPDExons and exon-intron boundaries0/180
500 SPD [992]c.68G>A, c.275A>G, c.422G>T and c.551A>G0/500
He et al. 2017 [26]China207 FPD and 207 SPD [400]Stop codon region0/414
Shi et al. 2017 [27]China550 SPD [560]Coding regions and exon-intron boundaries0/550
Ma et al. 2017 [28]Singapore99 PD [99]Coding regions0/99
Buongarzone et al. 2017 [29]Italy86 FPDExons0/86
Conedera et al. 2018 [30]Japan182 PDCoding regions and exon-intron boundaries0/182
CombinedAll world6904 PD [7299]Coding regionsMissense mutation/variants only in PDCoding regionsMissense mutation/variants only in PDAll19/6115 (2.752×10−3)

FPD, familial PD; SPD, sporadic PD; Het, heterozygous; Hom, homozygous; MAF, minor allele frequency; ExAC, Exome Aggregation Consortium database; gnomAD, Genome Aggregation Database. Data in reference 31 was not extracted due to the lack of detailed information [31].

Fig. 1

Missense mutation and variants associated with PD detected in TMEM230 coding regions. # The initial mutation detected in a large family with autosomal dominant and Lewy pathology confirmed PD. TMS, transmembrane segment.

Mutation/variants associated with PD detected in coding region of the TMEM230 gene FPD, familial PD; SPD, sporadic PD; Het, heterozygous; Hom, homozygous; MAF, minor allele frequency; ExAC, Exome Aggregation Consortium database; gnomAD, Genome Aggregation Database. Data in reference 31 was not extracted due to the lack of detailed information [31]. Missense mutation and variants associated with PD detected in TMEM230 coding regions. # The initial mutation detected in a large family with autosomal dominant and Lewy pathology confirmed PD. TMS, transmembrane segment.

THE POTENTIAL PATHOLOGICAL MECHANISM OF TMEM230 IN PD

The TMEM230 protein is localized to vesicle structures in human SH-SY5Y cells, and the mouse ortholog distributes to the same subcelluar structures in brain neurons including dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra [8]. These vesicle structures predominantly co-localize with STX6, a protein mainly enriched in the trans-Golgi network (TGN), and with vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2), vacuolar protein sorting-35 (VPS35), Rab5a and Rab11a proteins, suggesting that TMEM230-positive vesicles are involved in the function of synaptic vesicles and recycling of endosomes [8]. Thus, TMEM230 appears to play an important role in many cellular functions, including synaptic vesicles trafficking, retromer trafficking, secretory autophagy and Golgi-derived vesicle secretion. As such, it shares in pathogenic pathways implicated other PD-causing genes, such as the SNCA, LRRK2, VPS35 and PINK1 [32].

Interaction with SNCA

Mutations in synuclein alpha (SNCA) gene, which encodes α-synuclein protein, the key component of Lewy body inclusions, have resulted in ADPD [6, 33]. As the first PD-related gene identified and labeled PARK1, the typical PD clinical phenotype of patients was also associated with characteristic Lewy body pathology [6, 33]. Although the physiological function of α-synuclein protein remains enigmatic, mounting evidence suggests a regulatory function in synapse, such as vesicle trafficking, synaptic vesicle pool maintenance and neurotransmitter release [33]. TMEM230 protein was detected in α-synuclein-positive Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites both in sporadic PD and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) cases [8]. Similar to α-synuclein, the TMEM230 protein was observed in the synaptic vesicle pool region in the rat brain neuron presynapse [8, 34]. Expression of PD-related TMEM230 variants resulted in significantly slower movement of synaptic vesicles and increased α-synuclein protein level compared to wild-type protein possibly due to impairment of autophagy-mediated clearance [8, 32]. In addition, the Rab8a protein whose function is connected with TMEM230, also interacts with α-synuclein, and its overexpression reduces α-synuclein-induced toxicity in vitro and improves α-synuclein-induced behavioral defects in fruit flies [32, 35]. Intriguingly, tmem230a, the zebrafish ortholog of human TMEM230, could affect angiogenic blood vessel growth though Delta/Notch signaling pathway [36], which may be involved in neurodegenerative disease and reduced by overexpressive or mutant α-synuclein protein [37, 38].

Interaction with LRRK2

Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) mutations represent the most common genetic cause of ADPD and nearly half of LRRK2-related PD cases had Lewy bodies [6, 39]. LRRK2 protein has been found to phosphorylate several members of Rab family which plays a key role in all forms of intracellular vesicular trafficking [40]. The Rab8a protein is one of substrates of LRRK2, and its phosphorylation may be increased 2-3 fold by LRRK2 p.G2019S mutation [40]. Thus LRRK2 kinase activity-dependent phosphorylation may lead to deficits in cell polarization, neurite outgrowth and directed migration [41]. The Rab8a-mediated secretory vesicle and retromer trafficking were impaired when TMEM230 lost function, similar to lack of LRRK2 protein [32]. This suggests that TMEM230 and LRRK2 may share Rab8a-mediated vesicle trafficking pathway in development of PD and Lewy pathology. Additionally, Notch signaling pathway which may be associated with TMEM230 was also regulated by LRRK2 through endosomal pathway [36, 42].

Interaction with VPS35

VPS35, a causal gene linked to ADPD, encodes a subunit of retromer complex [43]. The TMEM230 protein partially co-localizes with VPS35 protein and both regulate retromer trafficking function [8]. The expression of TMEM230-R141L mutant protein changed VPS35 and itself from perinuclear to punctate cytoplasmic distribution [32]. However, only one VPS35-PD autopsy report showed no immunostaining for α-synuclein and there was no neuronal loss or intraneuronal inclusions in the cortex and basal ganglia; the substantia nigra tissue was not available [44]. Further studies are warranted to clarify the similarities and differences between TMEM230 and VPS35 in pathogenesis of PD.

Interaction with PINK1

Many mutations of phosphatase and tensin homolog-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1) gene have been identified in different families with autosomal recessive PD [45]. One early-onset PD patient with two compound heterozygous PINK1 mutations was reported to have neuronal loss and Lewy pathology in the SNpc [46]. This gene encodes PINK1 protein, a serine/threonine protein kinase whose activation caused phosphorylation of Rab8a at residue of serine 111 and significantly impaired Rab8a activation [47]. Further studies of Rab8a-involved pathway may help to elucidate the association between TMEM230 and PINK1 in pathogenesis of PD. In summary, there is a growing body of evidence that TMEM230 protein and its interaction with Rab8a, SNCA, LRRK2 and PINK1 may lead to PD-related neurodegeneration (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

The potential pathological mechanisms and associated proteins of TMEM230. TGN, trans-Golgi network; TMEM230, transmembrane protein 230; PINK1, phosphatase and tensin homolog-induced putative kinase 1; LRRK2, leucine-rich repeat kinase 2; VPS35, vacuolar protein sorting-35.

The potential pathological mechanisms and associated proteins of TMEM230. TGN, trans-Golgi network; TMEM230, transmembrane protein 230; PINK1, phosphatase and tensin homolog-induced putative kinase 1; LRRK2, leucine-rich repeat kinase 2; VPS35, vacuolar protein sorting-35.

THE POTENTIAL ROLE OF TMEM230 IN OTHER DISEASES

The TMEM230 gene may be potentially related with other neurodegenerative diseases with Lewy pathology such as DLB and AD, multiple system atrophy (MSA) [48, 49]. In AD patients, the TMEM230 protein was increased in hippocampal neurons and aggregated in granulovacuolar and dystrophic neurites, two prominent pathological features of AD [50]. No MSA-risk variants have been found in the TMEM230 gene in 110 cases of MSA [51]. Furthermore, He et al. did not find stop codon variants in the TMEM230 gene in 200 Chinese patients with essential tremor [26].

CONCLUSION

Even after exciting acceleration of PD research during the past 50 years since the discovery of levodopa, the pathogenesis of this complex disorder remains enigmatic [2]. Notable discoveries, especially the advances in genetics of PD in recent 20 years have greatly changed our understanding on etiology and pathogenesis of PD [1]. It seems increasingly clear that PD is a highly complex neurological disease with heterogeneous clinical presentation, variable pathological features, and multifactorial causes [52]. Reveal of the association of phenotype-genotype, especially analysis of protein interaction network involving in Lewy body-confirmed PD-related genes, which highly mimics idiopathic PD, will help to understand the main underlying pathogenic mechanism of this complex disorder [52]. But only a few of PD-related mutations have been associated to PD with Lewy body pathology which remains a core feature of most PD cases, without precise mechanism known [1, 6]. Only a few PD-related TMEM230 variants could not cover up its significance in discovering pathogenesis of PD. Copy number variations including duplication and triplication in the TMEM230 gene, perhaps share a similar mechanism resulting in PD with dementia as the SNCA gene [53], as well as its epigenetic or non-coding regulatory factors, cannot be ignored in future studies. The application of quantitative PCR, digital PCR, whole genome sequencing and epigenetic strategies may help to identify more pathogenic mechanisms involving TMEM230 in PD, especially phenotype with dementia and other neurodegenerative disorders. Future research should focus on development of TMEM230 genetic animal models to better understand the role of TMEM230 in pathogenesis of neurodegeneration. These studies may also provide insight into potential treatment and prevention of PD and related disorders.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.
  51 in total

Review 1.  Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Lorraine V Kalia; Anthony E Lang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Mutations in TMEM230 are rare in autosomal dominant Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Gabriele Buongarzone; Edoardo Monfrini; Giulia Franco; Ilaria Trezzi; Linda Borellini; Emanuele Frattini; Valentina Melzi; Anna Chiara Di Caprio; Dario Ronchi; Giacomo Monzio Compagnoni; Filippo Cogiamanian; Gianluca Ardolino; Nereo Bresolin; Giacomo P Comi; Stefania Corti; Alessio Di Fonzo
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.891

Review 3.  Not(ch) just development: Notch signalling in the adult brain.

Authors:  Jessica L Ables; Joshua J Breunig; Amelia J Eisch; Pasko Rakic
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Genetic mutations and functions of PINK1.

Authors:  Sumihiro Kawajiri; Shinji Saiki; Shigeto Sato; Nobutaka Hattori
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 14.819

5.  DNAJC13 mutations in Parkinson disease.

Authors:  Carles Vilariño-Güell; Alex Rajput; Austen J Milnerwood; Brinda Shah; Chelsea Szu-Tu; Joanne Trinh; Irene Yu; Mary Encarnacion; Lise N Munsie; Lucia Tapia; Emil K Gustavsson; Patrick Chou; Igor Tatarnikov; Daniel M Evans; Frederick T Pishotta; Mattia Volta; Dayne Beccano-Kelly; Christina Thompson; Michelle K Lin; Holly E Sherman; Heather J Han; Bruce L Guenther; Wyeth W Wasserman; Virginie Bernard; Colin J Ross; Silke Appel-Cresswell; A Jon Stoessl; Christopher A Robinson; Dennis W Dickson; Owen A Ross; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Jan O Aasly; Ruey-Meei Wu; Faycal Hentati; Rachel A Gibson; Peter S McPherson; Martine Girard; Michele Rajput; Ali H Rajput; Matthew J Farrer
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Cognitive and motor function in long-duration PARKIN-associated Parkinson disease.

Authors:  Roy N Alcalay; Elise Caccappolo; Helen Mejia-Santana; Ming Xin Tang; Llency Rosado; Martha Orbe Reilly; Diana Ruiz; Elan D Louis; Cynthia L Comella; Martha A Nance; Susan B Bressman; William K Scott; Caroline M Tanner; Susan F Mickel; Cheryl H Waters; Stanley Fahn; Lucien J Cote; Steven J Frucht; Blair Ford; Michael Rezak; Kevin E Novak; Joseph H Friedman; Ronald F Pfeiffer; Laura Marsh; Bradley Hiner; Haydeh Payami; Eric Molho; Stewart A Factor; John G Nutt; Carmen Serrano; Maritza Arroyo; Ruth Ottman; Michael W Pauciulo; William C Nichols; Lorraine N Clark; Karen S Marder
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 7.  Parkinson disease subtypes.

Authors:  Mary Ann Thenganatt; Joseph Jankovic
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 18.302

8.  Age at onset and Parkinson disease phenotype.

Authors:  Gennaro Pagano; Nicola Ferrara; David J Brooks; Nicola Pavese
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Phosphoproteomic screening identifies Rab GTPases as novel downstream targets of PINK1.

Authors:  Yu-Chiang Lai; Chandana Kondapalli; Ronny Lehneck; James B Procter; Brian D Dill; Helen I Woodroof; Robert Gourlay; Mark Peggie; Thomas J Macartney; Olga Corti; Jean-Christophe Corvol; David G Campbell; Aymelt Itzen; Matthias Trost; Miratul Mk Muqit
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  α-Synuclein interacts with the switch region of Rab8a in a Ser129 phosphorylation-dependent manner.

Authors:  Guowei Yin; Tomas Lopes da Fonseca; Sibylle E Eisbach; Ane Martín Anduaga; Carlo Breda; Maria L Orcellet; Éva M Szegő; Patricia Guerreiro; Diana F Lázaro; Gerhard H Braus; Claudio O Fernandez; Christian Griesinger; Stefan Becker; Roger S Goody; Aymelt Itzen; Flaviano Giorgini; Tiago F Outeiro; Markus Zweckstetter
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.996

View more
  2 in total

1.  Deficiency of lncRNA SNHG12 impairs ischemic limb neovascularization by altering an endothelial cell cycle pathway.

Authors:  David A Gross; Henry S Cheng; Rulin Zhuang; Michael G McCoy; Daniel Pérez-Cremades; Zachary Salyers; A K M Khyrul Wara; Stefan Haemmig; Terence E Ryan; Mark W Feinberg
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 2.  Genetic Imaging of Neuroinflammation in Parkinson's Disease: Recent Advancements.

Authors:  Longping Yao; Jiayu Wu; Sumeyye Koc; Guohui Lu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.