Literature DB >> 30175448

Effects of different cryopreservation methods on DNA integrity and sperm chromatin quality in men.

M F Lusignan1, X Li1, B Herrero2, G Delbes3, P T K Chan1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cryopreserved human sperm are used in assisted reproductive technology. However, the effect of cryopreservation on sperm DNA integrity is unclear.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to: (i) determine the impact of semen cryopreservation on human sperm DNA integrity and chromatin structure; (ii) test if parameters obtained from TUNEL and SCSA® correlate; and (iii) verify correlation between sperm motility, morphology and viability with TUNEL and SCSA® parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men attending a fertility clinic were recruited and grouped according to their sperm parameters (n = 9/group): normozoospermia, oligoasthenoteratozoospermia and teratozoospermia. Each semen sample was processed as follow: (i) directly frozen at -80 °C; (ii) diluted in Sperm Maintenance Medium, cooled for 30 min at 4 °C and frozen at -80 °C; (iii) diluted in Sperm Maintenance Medium; or (iv) in SpermFreeze. Each mixture from method (iii) and (iv) was then suspended for 30 min in liquid nitrogen vapor and plunged into liquid nitrogen. After at least two months of storage, samples were thawed at room temperature and analyzed for motility and viability, TUNEL and SCSA® assays.
RESULTS: Progressive motility and viability decreased after freeze-thawing. TUNEL scores increased significantly in all samples after freezing-thawing while no significant change in the DNA fragmentation index (DFI) from SCSA® was observed. No change in the percentage high DNA stainability (HDS) was observed in normozoospermic samples; however it was significantly increased in all the methods in oligoasthenoteratozoospermic and in the methods (ii)-(iv) in teratozoospermic samples. The DFI and TUNEL scores correlated significantly with each other and inversely with sperm motility, viability and morphology. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: Cryopreservation seems to be deleterious for the integrity of human sperm DNA and compaction. However, the sperm DFI was not affected during cryopreservation under the various methods of storage tested. Clinicians and investigators should take this information into consideration when using cryopreserved sperm for assisted reproduction.
© 2018 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA breaks; cryopreservation; male infertility; sperm chromatin; sperm quality

Year:  2018        PMID: 30175448     DOI: 10.1111/andr.12529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrology        ISSN: 2047-2919            Impact factor:   3.842


  11 in total

Review 1.  Sperm cryopreservation and DNA methylation: possible implications for ART success and the health of offspring.

Authors:  Kajal Khodamoradi; Zahra Rashidi; Malihe Jahromi; Elham Shiri; Ensieh Salehi; Zahra Khosravizadeh; Ali Talebi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 2.  Advanced Paternal Age and Future Generations.

Authors:  Peter T K Chan; Bernard Robaire
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.055

3.  Investigation of molecular cryopreservation, fertility potential and microRNA-mediated apoptosis in Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia men.

Authors:  Maryam Ezzati; Dariush Shanehbandi; Behzad Bahramzadeh; Kobra Hamdi; Maryam Pashaiasl
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 4.  Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Armand Zini; Robert Matthew Coward; Donald P Evenson; Jaime Gosálvez; Sheena E M Lewis; Rakesh Sharma; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.775

5.  Comparative Analysis of MicroRNA and mRNA Profiles of Sperm with Different Freeze Tolerance Capacities in Boar (Sus scrofa) and Giant Panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca).

Authors:  Ming-Xia Ran; Ying-Min Zhou; Kai Liang; Wen-Can Wang; Yan Zhang; Ming Zhang; Jian-Dong Yang; Guang-Bin Zhou; Kai Wu; Cheng-Dong Wang; Yan Huang; Bo Luo; Izhar Hyder Qazi; He-Min Zhang; Chang-Jun Zeng
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-09-01

6.  Does conventional freezing affect sperm DNA fragmentation?

Authors:  Minh Tam Le; Thai Thanh Thi Nguyen; Tung Thanh Nguyen; Trung Van Nguyen; Tam An Thi Nguyen; Quoc Huy Vu Nguyen; Thanh Ngoc Cao
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2019-06-01

7.  DNA fragmentation index (DFI) as a measure of sperm quality and fertility in mice.

Authors:  Ming-Wen Li; K C Kent Lloyd
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Resveratrol and lycium barbarum polysaccharide improve Qinling giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca Qinlingensis) sperm quality during cryopreservation.

Authors:  Ruixue Zhang; Hemeng Dong; Pengpeng Zhao; Chunmei Shang; Hang Qi; Yongjie Ma; Chuxi Gao; Danhui Zhang; Jiena Shen; Yinghu Lei; Yaping Jin; Pengfei Lin
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Cellular and Functional Physiopathology of Bull Sperm With Altered Sperm Freezability.

Authors:  Mustafa Hitit; Muhammet Rasit Ugur; Thu Tran Nhat Dinh; Dishnu Sajeev; Abdullah Kaya; Einko Topper; Wei Tan; Erdogan Memili
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-10-23

10.  Relationship Among Traditional Semen Parameters, Sperm DNA Fragmentation, and Unexplained Recurrent Miscarriage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yanpeng Dai; Junjie Liu; Enwu Yuan; Yushan Li; Ying Shi; Linlin Zhang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.