Paul L Hebert1,2, Adam S Batten3, Eric Gunnink3, Ashok Reddy2,4, Edwin S Wong1,2, Stephan D Fihn4, Chuan-Fen Liu1,2. 1. Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA. 2. Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA. 3. PACT Demonstration Laboratory Initiative, Veterans Health Administration, Seattle, WA. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of Medicare use on the receipt of outpatient services from 2001 through 2015 for a cohort of Veterans Administration (VA) users who became age-eligible for Medicare in 1998-2000. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: VA administrative data linked with Medicare claims for veterans who participated in the 1999 Large Health Survey of Enrolled Veterans. STUDY DESIGN: We coded each veteran as VA-reliant or Medicare-reliant based on the number of visits in each system and compared the health and social risk factors between VA-reliant and Medicare-reliant veterans. We used bivariate probit and instrumental variables models to estimate the association between a veteran's reliance on Medicare and the receipt of outpatient procedures in Medicare and the VA. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Veterans who chose to rely on the VA (n = 4,317) had substantially worse social and health risk factors than Medicare-reliant veterans (n = 2,567). Medicare reliance was associated with greater use of outpatient services for 24 of the 28 types of services considered. Instrumental variable estimates found significant effects of Medicare reliance on receipt of advanced imaging and cardiovascular testing. CONCLUSIONS: Expanded access to fee-for-service care in the community may be expensive, while the VA will likely continue to care for the most vulnerable veterans. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of Medicare use on the receipt of outpatient services from 2001 through 2015 for a cohort of Veterans Administration (VA) users who became age-eligible for Medicare in 1998-2000. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: VA administrative data linked with Medicare claims for veterans who participated in the 1999 Large Health Survey of Enrolled Veterans. STUDY DESIGN: We coded each veteran as VA-reliant or Medicare-reliant based on the number of visits in each system and compared the health and social risk factors between VA-reliant and Medicare-reliant veterans. We used bivariate probit and instrumental variables models to estimate the association between a veteran's reliance on Medicare and the receipt of outpatient procedures in Medicare and the VA. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Veterans who chose to rely on the VA (n = 4,317) had substantially worse social and health risk factors than Medicare-reliant veterans (n = 2,567). Medicare reliance was associated with greater use of outpatient services for 24 of the 28 types of services considered. Instrumental variable estimates found significant effects of Medicare reliance on receipt of advanced imaging and cardiovascular testing. CONCLUSIONS: Expanded access to fee-for-service care in the community may be expensive, while the VA will likely continue to care for the most vulnerable veterans. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
Veterans Administration; ambulatory procedures; community care; medicare
Authors: J Michael McWilliams; Jesse B Dalton; Mary Beth Landrum; Austin B Frakt; Steven D Pizer; Nancy L Keating Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-02-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Alfredo J Selim; Dan Berlowitz; Lewis E Kazis; William Rogers; Steven M Wright; Shirley X Qian; James A Rothendler; Avron Spiro; Donald Miller; Bernardo J Selim; Benjamin G Fincke Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-12-30 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Stephan D Fihn; Joseph Francis; Carolyn Clancy; Christopher Nielson; Karin Nelson; John Rumsfeld; Theresa Cullen; Jack Bates; Gail L Graham Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: James F Burgess; Matthew L Maciejewski; Chris L Bryson; Michael Chapko; John C Fortney; Mark Perkins; Nancy D Sharp; Chuan-Fen Liu Journal: Health Econ Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Franya Hutchins; Joshua Thorpe; Matthew L Maciejewski; Xinhua Zhao; Karin Daniels; Hongwei Zhang; Donna M Zulman; Stephan Fihn; Sandeep Vijan; Ann-Marie Rosland Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-11-03 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Ann M O'Hare; Catherine R Butler; Ryan J Laundry; Whitney Showalter; Jeffrey Todd-Stenberg; Pam Green; Paul L Hebert; Virginia Wang; Janelle S Taylor; Marieke Van Eijk; Kameron L Matthews; Susan T Crowley; Evan Carey Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 44.409
Authors: Emily Franzosa; Morgan Traylor; Kimberly M Judon; Vivian Guerrero Aquino; Ashley L Schwartzkopf; Kenneth S Boockvar; Brian E Dixon Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Nicholas S Koufacos; Justine May; Kimberly M Judon; Emily Franzosa; Brian E Dixon; Cathy C Schubert; Ashley L Schwartzkopf; Vivian M Guerrero; Morgan Traylor; Kenneth S Boockvar Journal: J Gerontol Soc Work Date: 2021-05-30
Authors: Linnaea Schuttner; Bjarni Haraldsson; Charles Maynard; Christian D Helfrich; Ashok Reddy; Toral Parikh; Karin M Nelson; Edwin Wong Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-10-01