| Literature DB >> 30174658 |
Takahiro Takazono1,2, Koichi Izumikawa1.
Abstract
Purpose: The diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is occasionally complicated due to poor sensitivity of mycological culture and colonization of Aspergillus species in the airway. Several diagnostic methods have been developed for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis; however, their interpretation and significance are different in CPA. This study aimed to review the recent advances in diagnostic methods and their characteristics in the diagnosis of CPA. Recent findings: Radiological findings of lung, histopathology, and culture are the gold standard of CPA diagnosis. Serodiagnosis methods involving the use of galactomannan and β-D-glucan have low sensitivity and specificity. An Aspergillus-specific IgG antibody assay showed good performance and had better sensitivity and reproducibility than conventional precipitant antibody assays. Currently, it is the most reliable method for diagnosing CPA caused by Aspergillus fumigatus, but evidence on its effectiveness in diagnosing CPA caused by non-fumigatus Aspergillus is lacking. Newly developed lateral flow device Aspergillus and detection of volatile organic compounds in breath have potential, but evidence on its effectiveness in diagnosing CPA is lacking. The increasing prevalence of azole-resistant A. fumigatus strains has become a threat to public health. Some of the azole-resistant-related genes can be detected directly from clinical samples using a commercially available kit. However, its clinical efficacy for routine use remains unclear, since resistance-related genes greatly differ among regions and countries.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus; Aspergillus IgG antibody; aspergillosis; azole resistance; galactomannan
Year: 2018 PMID: 30174658 PMCID: PMC6107790 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01810
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Diagnostic methods for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis.
| Culture | Respiratory specimens | 11.8–81.0 | – | Kitasato et al., | |
| β-D-glucan | Serum | 15.4–26.7 | 95.8 | Kitasato et al., | |
| BALF | 77.8 | 72.5 | Cutoff ≧ 100 (Wako turbidimetric assay) | Urabe et al., | |
| Galactomannan | Serum | 22.6–66.7 | 63.5 | Cut off values differ in each study between 0.5 and 1.0 | Kitasato et al., |
| BALF | 77.2–77.8 | 77–90 | Cut off values differ in each study between 0.4 and 0.5 | Izumikawa et al., | |
| Serum | 56–89.3 | 100 | Kitasato et al., | ||
| Serum | 93.2 | 98.2 | Bio-Rad | Page et al., | |
| 83.8–98 | 84–98 | ImmunoCAP | Fujiuchi et al., | ||
| 92.9–96 | 98–99.3 | Immulite | Page et al., | ||
| 84.2–90 | 91–98 | Serion | Page et al., | ||
| 77 | 97 | Dynamiker | Page et al., | ||
| 75 | 99 | Genesis | Page et al., | ||
| PCR | BALF | 66.7–86.7 | 84.2–94.2 | Non-standardized method | Urabe et al., |
BALF, Bronchial alveolar lavage fluid.
Figure 1Proposed algorithm for the diagnosis of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage.