Literature DB >> 30174563

S Levy1, M Chaouat1, N Malca1, K Serror1, M Mimoun1, D Boccara1.   

Abstract

Chemical burns raise diagnostic and treatment issues because they have specific appearances and evolution. Our objective was to study the characteristics of chemical burns and to assess the quality of our treatment. This retrospective observational study examined the records of all patients admitted for chemical burns to the burn treatment center of Saint Louis Hospital in Paris from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 2015. During this period, 162 patients came to our center for chemical burn treatment. Most of them were men (67%). The majority of the burns were caused by alkalis (27%) and resulted from workplace accidents (29%). The average time before consultation was 5.36 days. The areas mainly damaged were the hands (36%) and the burn areas averaged 1.2% of the total body surface area (TBSA). Forty-eight patients had at least one deep patch. In total, 59 patients (36.4%) were hospitalized for an average duration of 4.18 days. Thirty-eight of them underwent surgery. Lastly, 92% of the operations had been anticipated from the first consultation. In our center, the population affected, the circumstances and the topography of our patients' burns were similar to the data from the literature. It appears that the principal specificity of our series is a very low body surface burned. This can be attributed to the prevention measures we have in France and underlines their importance. Only 8% of the patients who had surgery were underestimated or their burns became deeper secondarily. This number is lower than the data from other series.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30174563      PMCID: PMC6116657     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters        ISSN: 1592-9558


  15 in total

1.  An audit of the use of laser Doppler imaging (LDI) in the assessment of burns of intermediate depth.

Authors:  S A Pape; C A Skouras; P O Byrne
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Burns in Sweden: an analysis of 24,538 cases during the period 1987-2004.

Authors:  Emma Akerlund; Fredrik R M Huss; Folke Sjöberg
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.744

3.  Chemical burns: our 10-year experience.

Authors:  A Singer; A Sagi; P Ben Meir; L Rosenberg
Journal:  Burns       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.744

4.  Going deep into chemical burns.

Authors:  C Y Wang; M J Su; H C Chen; S Y Ou; K W Liu; H T Hsiao
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.473

Review 5.  Assessment of burn depth and burn wound healing potential.

Authors:  Stan Monstrey; Henk Hoeksema; Jos Verbelen; Ali Pirayesh; Phillip Blondeel
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 6.  Cutaneous chemical burns: assessment and early management.

Authors:  Neiraja Gnaneswaran; Eshini Perera; Marlon Perera; Raja Sawhney
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2015-03

7.  Acid and alkali burns: considerations in management.

Authors:  C P Sawhney; R Kaushish
Journal:  Burns       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 8.  Chemical burns--an historical comparison and review of the literature.

Authors:  Joseph Hardwicke; Thomas Hunter; Robert Staruch; Naiem Moiemen
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  Epidemiology of domestic chemical burns in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  J Pitkanen; M M Al-Qattan
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.744

10.  Epidemiology of 377 patients with chemical burns in Guangdong province.

Authors:  Youfu Xie; Yanyan Tan; Shuze Tang
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.744

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.