| Literature DB >> 30174524 |
Lingfa Ma1,2, Shuling He2,3, Fenrui Li1, Jingjun Yang2, Yuwei Chang2, Kentian Zhao3, Ningyu Liu4.
Abstract
To explore the reason causing low yield, poor quality of Inula helenium I., this paper investigated the influence of different remained stem heights on the yield, quality and water consumption of Inula helenium I. in Gannan plateau area using field single factor randomized block method. Research results showed that Inula helenium I. which was cut before blooming period in the last ten-day of July with remained stem height of 25 cm had the lowest water consumption, the best underground root traits (including main root length, root diameter, and root dry weight per plant), and the highest yield which was higher that control group by 18.73% (P < .01) Moreover, Inula helenium I. with remained stem height of 25 cm had the lowest ash content while the highest alantolactone content, therefore its quality was the best. The water use efficiency (WUE) of Inula helenium I. with remained stem height of 35 cm at September was the highest (1.12 kg⋅h⋅m-2⋅mm-1). However, in terms of biological yield WUE and economic yield WUE, Inula helenium I. with remained stem height of 15 cm was the highest. Therefore, it can be concluded that remained stem height from 15 to 25 cm is an ideal solution, which can not only save water, but also improve yield and quality of Inula helenium I.Entities:
Keywords: Growth; Quality; Tibet inula root; Water consumption; Water use efficiency
Year: 2017 PMID: 30174524 PMCID: PMC6117432 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Effect of remained stem height of Inula helenium I. on soil water consumption (kg⋅h⋅m−2).
| Remained stem height (cm) | Soil storage amount (mm) | Water consumption (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| CK | 268.74 | 859.05 ± 5.14aA |
| 45 | 576.93 | 560.18 ± 7.21bB |
| 35 | 620.22 | 536.38 ± 10.32bBm |
| 25 | 744.66 | 423.75 ± 11.01dD |
| 15 | 683.39 | 489.08 ± 15.53cC |
Note: Difference of lowercase letter represents the intergroup difference reach significant level P < .05; difference of capital letter represents the intergroup difference reach significant level P < .01.
Effect of remained stem height of Inula helenium I. on soil water use efficiency.
| Remained stem height (cm) | Water use efficiency (kg⋅h⋅m−2⋅mm−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July | August | September | October | |
| CK | 0.23 ± 0.04dD | 0.30 ± 0.03eD | 0.36 ± 0.04dD | 0.26 ± 0.03eE |
| 45 | 0.52 ± 0.04cC | 0.62 ± 0.06dC | 0.74 ± 0.04cC | 0.56 ± 0.06dD |
| 35 | 0.99 ± 0.09aA | 1.26 ± 0.07aA | 1.38 ± 0.08aA | 1.12 ± 0.06aA |
| 25 | 0.80 ± 0.07bB | 0.96 ± 0.05bB | 1.06 ± 0.04bB | 0.91 ± 0.03bB |
| 15 | 0.65 ± 0.06cBC | 0.82 ± 0.10cB | 1.01 ± 0.08bB | 0.74 ± 0.033cC |
Effect of remained stem height of Inula helenium I. on underground root.
| Remained stem height (cm) | Main root length长 (cm) | Root diameter (mm) | Number of branch roots (stripe) | Dried root weight per plant (g/plant) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 14.00 ± 0.20eE | 22.64 ± 0.07eD | 2.22 ± 0.58cB | 136.89 ± 1.19eE |
| 45 | 15.33 ± 0.06dD | 23.69 ± 0.33dC | 2.99 ± 1bcAB | 142.20 ± 0.33dD |
| 35 | 15.99 ± 0.21cC | 24.01 ± 0.15cC | 3.22 ± 0.58abcAB | 151.52 ± 0.62cC |
| 25 | 18.74 ± 0.08aA | 26.47 ± 0.04aA | 4.22 ± 0.58aA | 159.19 ± 0.06aA |
| 15 | 16.99 ± 0.15bB | 25.45 ± 0.09bB | 3.56 ± 0.58abA | 154.31 ± 0.06bB |
Effect of remained stem height of Inula helenium I. on its yield and quality.
| Remained stem height (cm) | Yield per block (kg⋅m−2) | Yield (kg⋅h⋅m−2) | Ash content (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 1.51 ± 0.02dD | 15113.52 ± 20.12dD | 3.30 ± 0.01aA | 13.65 ± 0.03eE |
| 45 | 1.58 ± 0.01cC | 15816.51 ± 25.51cC | 3.23 ± 0.02bB | 14.01 ± 0.08dD |
| 35 | 1.69 ± 0.03bB | 16934.78 ± 29.33bB | 3.16 ± 0.05cB | 14.84 ± 0.11cC |
| 25 | 1.79 ± 0.04aA | 17945.64 ± 3 0.04aA | 3.04 ± 0.02dC | 16.04 ± 0.05aA |
| 15 | 1.73 ± 0.02bB | 17262.69 ± 26.12bB | 2.89 ± 0.01eD | 15.52 ± 0.09bB |
Effects of remained stem height on water consumption of Inula helenium I.
| Remained stem height (cm) | Water consumption (%) | Water use efficiency of biomass yield (kg⋅h⋅m−2⋅mm−1) | Water use efficiency of economic yield (kg⋅h⋅m−2⋅mm−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 625.12 | 40.86 ± 0.55eE | 39.60 ± 0.04eE |
| 45 | 531.33 | 46.01 ± 0.32dD | 45.23 ± 0.05dD |
| 35 | 472.15 | 51.05 ± 0.41cC | 50.30 ± 0.05cC |
| 25 | 451.05 | 56.76 ± 0.66bB | 50.61 ± 0.08bB |
| 15 | 423.32 | 59.87 ± 1.08aA | 53.57 ± 0.09aA |