| Literature DB >> 30174503 |
Chitra Pandey1,2, Vivek K Bajpai3, Yogesh Kumar Negi1, Irfan A Rather4, D K Maheshwari2.
Abstract
Amaranth (Entities:
Keywords: Amaranth; Bacillus spp.; Essential amino-acids; Proximate complete analysis
Year: 2018 PMID: 30174503 PMCID: PMC6117431 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.03.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
PGP traits of selected Bacillus isolates.
| Isolates | P-solubilization | Siderophore production | IAA production | HCN production |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS-27 | ++ | + | ++ | + |
| BS-41 | + | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| BS-58 | ++ | ++ | ++ | − |
Abbreviation: +, ++ Presence, − Absence. All the assays were performed in triplicates.
Fig. 1Effect of different bacilli treatments on various chemical constituents and amino acid compositions of amaranth grains. (a) Effect of different treatments on nutrients of amaranth grains [Moist: Moisture; CF: Crude Fiber; CP: Crude protein; CF: Crude fiber; DM: Dry matter; TA: Total Ash; AiA: Acid insoluble ash, Carb: Carbohydrate]. (b) Effect of different treatments on aminoacid composition of amaranth grains [Tryp: Tryptophan; Lys: Lysine; Meth: Methionine; TAA: Total amino-acid].
Effects of different treatments on chemical constituents of amaranth seeds.
| Treatments | Strain(s) used | Dry matter (%) | Moisture (%) | Crude protein (%) | Crude fiber (%) | Total fat (%) | Total ash (%) | Acid insoluble ash (%) | Carbohydrates (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-1 | Control | 72.14 ± 1.23 | 6.92 ± 0.89 | 13.33 ± 0.68 | 2.97 ± 0.89 | 6.06 ± 0.12 | 2.09 ± 0.36 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 46.06 ± 1.13 |
| T-2 | BS-41 | 92.72 ± 1.87 | 6.96 ± 0.77 | 15.04 ± 1.20 | 3.08 ± 1.02 | 7.02 ± 0.40 | 3.02 ± 1.13 | 0.33 ± 0.04 | 48.20 ± 0.72 |
| T-3 | BS-27 | 92.85 ± 1.51 | 7.15 ± 0.67 | 16.04 ± 0.28 | 3.20 ± 0.8 | 7.90 ± 0.57 | 3.34 ± 1.09 | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 55.00 ± 1.00 |
| T-4 | BS-58 | 92.92 ± 0.95 | 7.05 ± 0.54 | 15.23 ± 0.64 | 3.16 ± 0.60 | 7.80 ± 0.34 | 3.29 ± 0.63 | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 58.00 ± 1.56 |
| T-5 | BS-41+BS-27 | 92.64 ± 1.06 | 7.08 ± 0.11 | 15.59 ± 1.33 | 3.12 ± 0.40 | 7.55 ± 0.59 | 3.20 ± 0.29 | 0.30 ± 0.06 | 54.66 ± 0.57 |
| T-6 | BS-41+BS-58 | 92.72 ± 0.99 | 7.24 ± 0.43 | 15.85 ± 1.00 | 3.09 ± 0.43 | 7.38 ± 0.55 | 2.90 ± 0.27 | 0.34 ± 0.12 | 61.33 ± 1.15 |
| T-7 | BS-27+BS-58 | 95.41 ± 0.54 | 7.26 ± 1.01 | 16.84 ± 0.80 | 3.22 ± 0.48 | 8.33 ± 0.70 | 3.38 ± 0.74 | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 68.66 ± 1.52 |
| T-8 | BS-41+BS-27+BS-58 | 92.82 ± 2.43 | 7.08 ± 0.86 | 15.81 ± 1.06 | 3.04 ± 0.94 | 7.24 ± 0.35 | 2.80 ± 0.39 | 0.330.02 | 62.03 ± 0.90 |
| P-value (ANOVA) | P < 0.001 | P < 0.99 | P < 0.016 | P < 0.99 | P < 0.001 | P < 0.39 | P < 0.43 | P < 0.001 | |
Values are mean of three replicates. 2 g seed for each test (in triplicate) was used.
Effects of different treatments on amino-acid contents of amaranth seeds.
| Treatments | Strain(s) used | Amino-acid (μg/ml) | Methionine (g/16 gN) | Tryptophan (g/16 gN) | Lysine (g/16 gN) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | Control | 23.80 ± 1.08 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 1.37 ± 0.01 | 5.31 ± 0.39 |
| T2 | BS-41 | 26.00 ± 1.61 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | 1.60 ± 0.01 | 7.07 ± 0.11 |
| T3 | BS-27 | 30.94 ± 0.53 | 0.61 ± 0.009 | 1.84 ± 0.06 | 8.26 ± 0.65 |
| T4 | BS-58 | 30.00 ± 1.55 | 0.70 ± 0.007 | 1.42 ± 0.26 | 6.23 ± 0.44 |
| T5 | BS-41+BS-27 | 27.67 ± 1.09 | 0.67 ± 0.01 | 1.55 ± 0.12 | 7.32 ± 0.28 |
| T6 | BS-41+BS-58 | 30.90 ± 1.71 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 1.53 ± 0.02 | 7.39 ± 0.24 |
| T7 | BS-27+BS-58 | 32.00 ± 1.47 | 0.72 ± 0.01 | 1.96 ± 0.11 | 8.47 ± 0.70 |
| T8 | BS-41+BS-27+BS-58 | 25.26 ± 1.00 | 0.66 ± 0.02 | 1.81 ± 0.02 | 6.05 ± 0.56 |
| P-value (ANOVA) | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | |
Values are mean of three replicates. 2 g seed for each test (in triplicate) was used.