Literature DB >> 30174188

Local Inversion Heterozygosity Alters Recombination throughout the Genome.

K Nicole Crown1, Danny E Miller2, Jeff Sekelsky1, R Scott Hawley3.   

Abstract

Crossovers (COs) are formed during meiosis by the repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and are required for the proper segregation of chromosomes. More DSBs are made than COs, and the remaining DSBs are repaired as noncrossovers (NCOs). The distribution of recombination events along a chromosome occurs in a stereotyped pattern that is shaped by CO-promoting and CO-suppressing forces, collectively referred to as crossover patterning mechanisms. Chromosome inversions are structural aberrations that, when heterozygous, disrupt the recombination landscape by suppressing crossing over. In Drosophila species, the local suppression of COs by heterozygous inversions triggers an increase in crossing over on freely recombining chromosomes termed the interchromosomal (IC) effect [1, 2]. The molecular mechanism(s) by which heterozygous inversions suppress COs, whether noncrossover gene conversions (NCOGCs) are similarly affected, and what mediates the increase in COs in the rest of the genome remain open questions. By sequencing whole genomes of individual offspring from mothers containing heterozygous inversions, we show that, although COs are suppressed by inversions, NCOGCs occur throughout inversions at higher than wild-type frequencies. We confirm that CO frequency increases on the freely recombining chromosomes, yet CO interference remains intact. Intriguingly, NCOGCs do not increase in frequency on the freely recombining chromosomes and the total number of DSBs is approximately the same per genome. Together, our data show that heterozygous inversions change the recombination landscape by altering the relative proportions of COs and NCOGCs and suggest that DSB fate may be plastic until a CO assurance checkpoint has been satisfied.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; chromosome inversions; crossing over; interchromosomal effect; non-crossover gene conversion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30174188      PMCID: PMC6156927          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  34 in total

1.  The Relations of Inversions in the X Chromosome of Drosophila Melanogaster to Crossing over and Disjunction.

Authors:  A H Sturtevant; G W Beadle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1936-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The selfish Segregation Distorter gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Amanda M Larracuente; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic studies on heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster and their implications for the functions of satellite DNA.

Authors:  M Yamamoto; G L Miklos
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1978-03-22       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Chromosomal rearrangements maintain a polymorphic supergene controlling butterfly mimicry.

Authors:  Mathieu Joron; Lise Frezal; Robert T Jones; Nicola L Chamberlain; Siu F Lee; Christoph R Haag; Annabel Whibley; Michel Becuwe; Simon W Baxter; Laura Ferguson; Paul A Wilkinson; Camilo Salazar; Claire Davidson; Richard Clark; Michael A Quail; Helen Beasley; Rebecca Glithero; Christine Lloyd; Sarah Sims; Matthew C Jones; Jane Rogers; Chris D Jiggins; Richard H ffrench-Constant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis.

Authors:  Francesca Cole; Liisa Kauppi; Julian Lange; Ignasi Roig; Raymond Wang; Scott Keeney; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  Meiotic spindle assembly in Drosophila females: behavior of nonexchange chromosomes and the effects of mutations in the nod kinesin-like protein.

Authors:  W E Theurkauf; R S Hawley
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Homologue engagement controls meiotic DNA break number and distribution.

Authors:  Drew Thacker; Neeman Mohibullah; Xuan Zhu; Scott Keeney
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The Release 6 reference sequence of the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Roger A Hoskins; Joseph W Carlson; Kenneth H Wan; Soo Park; Ivonne Mendez; Samuel E Galle; Benjamin W Booth; Barret D Pfeiffer; Reed A George; Robert Svirskas; Martin Krzywinski; Jacqueline Schein; Maria Carmela Accardo; Elisabetta Damia; Giovanni Messina; María Méndez-Lago; Beatriz de Pablos; Olga V Demakova; Evgeniya N Andreyeva; Lidiya V Boldyreva; Marco Marra; A Bernardo Carvalho; Patrizio Dimitri; Alfredo Villasante; Igor F Zhimulev; Gerald M Rubin; Gary H Karpen; Susan E Celniker
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  The Molecular and Genetic Characterization of Second Chromosome Balancers in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Danny E Miller; Kevin R Cook; Elizabeth A Hemenway; Vivienne Fang; Angela L Miller; Karen G Hales; R Scott Hawley
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  23 in total

1.  X chromosome and autosomal recombination are differentially sensitive to disruptions in SC maintenance.

Authors:  Katherine Kretovich Billmyre; Cori K Cahoon; G Matthew Heenan; Emily R Wesley; Zulin Yu; Jay R Unruh; Satomi Takeo; R Scott Hawley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mutation Load in Sunflower Inversions Is Negatively Correlated with Inversion Heterozygosity.

Authors:  Kaichi Huang; Kate L Ostevik; Cassandra Elphinstone; Marco Todesco; Natalia Bercovich; Gregory L Owens; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 8.800

Review 3.  The Interchromosomal Effect: Different Meanings for Different Organisms.

Authors:  Danny E Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The Genomic Architecture and Evolutionary Fates of Supergenes.

Authors:  Juanita Gutiérrez-Valencia; P William Hughes; Emma L Berdan; Tanja Slotte
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Genome structural evolution in Brassica crops.

Authors:  Zhesi He; Ruiqin Ji; Lenka Havlickova; Lihong Wang; Yi Li; Huey Tyng Lee; Jiaming Song; Chushin Koh; Jinghua Yang; Mingfang Zhang; Isobel A P Parkin; Xiaowu Wang; David Edwards; Graham J King; Jun Zou; Kede Liu; Rod J Snowdon; Surinder S Banga; Ivana Machackova; Ian Bancroft
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 15.793

Review 6.  Let's get physical - mechanisms of crossover interference.

Authors:  Lexy von Diezmann; Ofer Rog
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.235

7.  Sex Chromosomes and Internal Telomeric Sequences in Dormitator latifrons (Richardson 1844) (Eleotridae: Eleotrinae): An Insight into their Origin in the Genus.

Authors:  Fabilene Gomes Paim; Mauro Nirchio; Claudio Oliveira; Anna Rita Rossi
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Sex-specific recombination patterns predict parent of origin for recurrent genomic disorders.

Authors:  Trenell J Mosley; H Richard Johnston; David J Cutler; Michael E Zwick; Jennifer G Mulle
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  The tumor suppressor BRCA1-BARD1 complex localizes to the synaptonemal complex and regulates recombination under meiotic dysfunction in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Qianyan Li; Takamune T Saito; Marina Martinez-Garcia; Alison J Deshong; Saravanapriah Nadarajan; Katherine S Lawrence; Paula M Checchi; Monica P Colaiacovo; JoAnne Engebrecht
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  An Ultra High-Density Arabidopsis thaliana Crossover Map That Refines the Influences of Structural Variation and Epigenetic Features.

Authors:  Beth A Rowan; Darren Heavens; Tatiana R Feuerborn; Andrew J Tock; Ian R Henderson; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.