Maria-Carmen Costea1, Cosmina-Ioana Bondor2, Alexandrina Muntean3, Mîndra E Badea4, Anca-Ştefania Mesaroş5, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman6. 1. Private practice, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 2. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 3. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Electronic address: ortoanda@yahoo.com. 4. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Preventive Dentistry, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 5. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Propaedeutics and Aesthetics, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 6. Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Orthodontists consider facial growth pattern and oral function when developing a treatment plan. Less attention is given to the relationship between the maxillary posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the roots of the maxillary posterior teeth and the floor of the maxillary sinus. METHODS: Proximity of the roots to the maxillary sinus was scored for the left and right first and second premolars and molars (scores, 0-3). Mean scores per patient and per tooth type were calculated. The influences of age, sex, and facial biotype on mean scores per patient and tooth were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean scores per patient and the second molar scores were significantly lower in the normodivergent subjects compared with the hypodivergent subjects, and in the hypodivergent vs the hyperdivergent groups, indicating that the hypodivergent biotype had significantly fewer second molar roots into the sinus than the normodivergent and hyperdivergent biotypes. Age had no effect on mean score per patient, but in the hyperdivergent group, the second molar score increased with age, meaning that second molar roots tend to be closer to the sinus floor. CONCLUSIONS: In a young population (7-24 years), the positions of the apices of the maxillary second molar roots in relation to the maxillary sinus floor are associated with the facial biotype. In a hypodivergent biotype, the roots of the second molars are located farther from the sinus floor compared with the normodivergent and hyperdivergent facial patterns.
INTRODUCTION: Orthodontists consider facial growth pattern and oral function when developing a treatment plan. Less attention is given to the relationship between the maxillary posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the roots of the maxillary posterior teeth and the floor of the maxillary sinus. METHODS: Proximity of the roots to the maxillary sinus was scored for the left and right first and second premolars and molars (scores, 0-3). Mean scores per patient and per tooth type were calculated. The influences of age, sex, and facial biotype on mean scores per patient and tooth were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean scores per patient and the second molar scores were significantly lower in the normodivergent subjects compared with the hypodivergent subjects, and in the hypodivergent vs the hyperdivergent groups, indicating that the hypodivergent biotype had significantly fewer second molar roots into the sinus than the normodivergent and hyperdivergent biotypes. Age had no effect on mean score per patient, but in the hyperdivergent group, the second molar score increased with age, meaning that second molar roots tend to be closer to the sinus floor. CONCLUSIONS: In a young population (7-24 years), the positions of the apices of the maxillary second molar roots in relation to the maxillary sinus floor are associated with the facial biotype. In a hypodivergent biotype, the roots of the second molars are located farther from the sinus floor compared with the normodivergent and hyperdivergent facial patterns.
Authors: Ehab A Abdulghani; Maged Sultan Alhammadi; Abeer A Al-Sosowa; Abeer A Almashraqi; Hasan M Sharhan; Hanan Al-Fakeh; BaoCheng Cao Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2022-03-20 Impact factor: 3.606