Literature DB >> 30173793

Risk Factors for Recurrence of Anterior-Inferior Instability of the Shoulder After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients Younger Than 30 Years.

Sung Hyun Lee1, Kyeong Hoon Lim1, Jeong Woo Kim2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the risk factors for recurrent instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair and evaluate the recurrence rate and functional outcomes.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with anterior-inferior shoulder instability who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between 2008 and 2014. Patients below 30 years of age who were available for follow-up at least for 2 years were sorted into 2 groups according to the presence of recurrent instability. Furthermore, statistical analysis by binary logistic regression analysis included the significance of various risk factors including gender, demographic factors, number of preoperative dislocations, time interval between the first dislocation and the surgery (shorter than 6 months or not), generalized hyperlaxity, concomitant injury, bony Bankart, and off-track lesion. The functional outcomes were assessed with the Rowe and Walch-Duplay scores.
RESULTS: A total of 170 shoulders were included (without-recurrence group: 138, recurrent group: 32). The overall postoperative recurrent instability rate was 18.8%. SLAP repair, interval closure, and capsular plication were performed when necessary. However, these additional procedures were not influenced by recurrence (P = .37). The 2 groups showed significant differences in the number of preoperative dislocations (P = .048; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2-5 times, 6.41; more than 5 times, 8.77), time interval between the first dislocation and surgery (P = .003, adjusted OR 5.62), and off-track Hill-Sachs lesion (P = .04, adjusted OR 4.31). There was significant improvement in the mean Rowe and Walch-Duplay scores at 2 years postoperatively (P < .001 in both cases), but the mean scores were lower in the group with recurrence than in the group without (P = .021 and .014, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall results suggest that surgery within 6 months of the first dislocation should be considered, with meticulous attention in patients with a high number of preoperative dislocations or off-track Hill-Sachs lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case-control study.
Copyright © 2018 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30173793     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  14 in total

1.  Instability severity index score values below 7 do not predict recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Cristina Victoria Asenjo Gismero; Santos Moros Marco; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Teresa Del Olmo Hernández; Gabriel Del Monte Bello; Miguel García Navlet; Jose Luis Ávila Lafuente; Jorge Díaz Heredia
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Maximal Medical Improvement Following Shoulder Stabilization Surgery May Require up to 1 Year: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bhavik H Patel; Yining Lu; Avinesh Agarwalla; Richard N Puzzitiello; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Jorge Chahla; Brian Forsythe
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-09-10

3.  When to Abandon the Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Benjamin J Levy; Nathan L Grimm; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  Open Shoulder Stabilization for Instability: Anterior Labral Repair With Capsular Shift.

Authors:  Courtney R Carlson Strother; Richard J McLaughlin; Aaron J Krych; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Christopher L Camp
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-07-04

5.  Biomechanical Comparison of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Versus Conjoint Tendon Transfer in a Bone Loss Shoulder Instability Model.

Authors:  Steven L Bokshan; Joseph A Gil; Steven F DeFroda; Rohit Badida; Joseph J Crisco; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-11-25

6.  A single-institution analysis of factors affecting costs in the arthroscopic treatment of glenohumeral instability.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; William Uffman; Garrett Christensen; Patrick Greis; Stephen Aoki; Richard Nelson; Minkyoung Yoo; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-03-16

7.  Primary Bankart Repair Versus Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction in Patients with Subcritical Bone Loss: A Cost-Utility Analysis.

Authors:  Zakariya S Ali; Kednapa Thavorn; Ryland Murphy; Sara Sparavalo; Ivan Wong
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-10-21

8.  Clinical Outcomes of Revision Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Repair for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability With Moderate Glenoid Bone Defects: A Comparison With Primary Surgery.

Authors:  Young Dae Jeon; Hyong Suk Kim; Sung-Min Rhee; Myeong Gon Jeong; Joo Han Oh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-12-14

9.  [Short-term effectiveness of arthroscopically capsular vertical mattress suturing for shoulder recurrent anterior dislocation combined with joint laxity].

Authors:  Yan Li; Lin Ma; Mingyu Yang; Miduo Mu; Aining Yang; Binghua Zhou; Kanglai Tang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-11-15

Review 10.  High Variability of the Definition of Recurrent Glenohumeral Instability: An Analysis of the Current Literature by a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hassanin Alkaduhimi; James W Connelly; Derek F P van Deurzen; Denise Eygendaal; Michel P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.