| Literature DB >> 30172937 |
Pratik Satya1, Avrajit Chakraborty2, Debabrata Sarkar2, Maya Karan2, Debajeet Das2, Nur Alam Mandal2, Dipnarayan Saha2, Subhojit Datta2, Soham Ray2, Chandan Sourav Kar2, Pran Gobinda Karmakar2, Jiban Mitra2, Nagendra Kumar Singh3.
Abstract
Enzyme β-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23) is known to influence vascular differentiation during early vegetative growth of plants, but its role in hypocotyl development is not yet fully understood. We generated the hypocotyl transcriptome data of a hypocotyl-defect jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) mutant (52,393 unigenes) and its wild-type (WT) cv. JRC-212 (44,720 unigenes) by paired-end RNA-seq and identified 11 isoforms of β-galactosidase, using a combination of sequence annotation, domain identification and structural-homology modeling. Phylogenetic analysis classified the jute β-galactosidases into six subfamilies of glycoside hydrolase-35 family, which are closely related to homologs from Malvaceous species. We also report here the expression of a β-galactosidase of glycoside hydrolase-2 family that was earlier considered to be absent in higher plants. Comparative analysis of domain structure allowed us to propose a domain-centric evolution of the five classes of plant β-galactosidases. Further, we observed 1.8-12.2-fold higher expression of nine β-galactosidase isoforms in the mutant hypocotyl, which was characterized by slower growth, undulated shape and deformed cell wall. In vitro and in vivo β-galactosidase activities were also higher in the mutant hypocotyl. Phenotypic analysis supported a significant (P ≤ 0.01) positive correlation between enzyme activity and undulated hypocotyl. Taken together, our study identifies the complete set of β-galactosidases expressed in the jute hypocotyl, and provides compelling evidence that they may be involved in cell wall degradation during hypocotyl development.Entities:
Keywords: Cell wall; Corchorus capsularis L.; Domain; Evolution; Hypocotyl; Malvaceae; Mutant; Transcriptome; β-galactosidase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30172937 DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2018.08.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phytochemistry ISSN: 0031-9422 Impact factor: 4.072