Ashleigh M Tickell1, Elizabeth M Scott2, Tracey Davenport3, Frank Iorfino3, Laura Ospina-Pinillos3, Kate Harel2, Lisa Parker2, Ian B Hickie3, Daniel F Hermens4. 1. Clinical Research Unit, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, 100 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia. Electronic address: ashleigh.tickell@sydney.edu.au. 2. Young Adult Mental Health Unit, Uspace, St Vincent's Private Hospital, Australia. 3. Clinical Research Unit, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, 100 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia. 4. Clinical Research Unit, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, 100 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; Sunshine Coast Mind and Neuroscience Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, QLD, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence to support the need for personalised intervention in the early stages of a major psychiatric illness, as well as the clear delineation of subgroups in psychiatric disorders based on cognitive impairment. Affective disorders are often accompanied by neurocognitive deficits; however a lack of research among young adult inpatients highlights the need to assess the utility of cognitive testing in this population. METHODS: A computerised cognitive battery was administered to 50 current inpatient young adults (16-30 years; 75% female) with an affective disorder. Patients also completed a computerised self-report questionnaire (to measure demographics and clinical features) that included items evaluating subjective impressions of their cognition. RESULTS: Hierarchical cluster analysis determined two neurocognitive subgroups: cluster 1 (n = 16) showed more severe impairments in sustained attention and memory as well as higher anxiety levels, compared to their peers in cluster 2 (n = 30) who showed the most impaired attentional switching. Across the sample, poor sustained attention was significantly correlated with higher levels of current anxiety and depressive symptoms, whereas poor verbal memory was significantly associated with increased psychological distress. LIMITATIONS: This study has a relatively small sample size (due to it being a pilot/feasibility study). Furthermore, future studies should aim to assess inpatient samples compared to community care samples, as well as healthy controls, on a larger scale. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest neurocognitive profiles are important in understanding phenotypes within young people with severe affective disorders. With clear subgroups based on cognitive impairment being demonstrated, the clinical utility and use of new and emerging technologies is warranted in such inpatients facilities. This pilot/feasibility study has strengthened the utility of cognitive screening as standard clinical care in an inpatient unit.
BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence to support the need for personalised intervention in the early stages of a major psychiatric illness, as well as the clear delineation of subgroups in psychiatric disorders based on cognitive impairment. Affective disorders are often accompanied by neurocognitive deficits; however a lack of research among young adult inpatients highlights the need to assess the utility of cognitive testing in this population. METHODS: A computerised cognitive battery was administered to 50 current inpatient young adults (16-30 years; 75% female) with an affective disorder. Patients also completed a computerised self-report questionnaire (to measure demographics and clinical features) that included items evaluating subjective impressions of their cognition. RESULTS: Hierarchical cluster analysis determined two neurocognitive subgroups: cluster 1 (n = 16) showed more severe impairments in sustained attention and memory as well as higher anxiety levels, compared to their peers in cluster 2 (n = 30) who showed the most impaired attentional switching. Across the sample, poor sustained attention was significantly correlated with higher levels of current anxiety and depressive symptoms, whereas poor verbal memory was significantly associated with increased psychological distress. LIMITATIONS: This study has a relatively small sample size (due to it being a pilot/feasibility study). Furthermore, future studies should aim to assess inpatient samples compared to community care samples, as well as healthy controls, on a larger scale. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest neurocognitive profiles are important in understanding phenotypes within young people with severe affective disorders. With clear subgroups based on cognitive impairment being demonstrated, the clinical utility and use of new and emerging technologies is warranted in such inpatients facilities. This pilot/feasibility study has strengthened the utility of cognitive screening as standard clinical care in an inpatient unit.
Authors: Ashley L Comes; Fanny Senner; Monika Budde; Kristina Adorjan; Heike Anderson-Schmidt; Till F M Andlauer; Katrin Gade; Maria Hake; Urs Heilbronner; Janos L Kalman; Daniela Reich-Erkelenz; Farah Klöhn-Saghatolislam; Sabrina K Schaupp; Eva C Schulte; Georg Juckel; Udo Dannlowski; Max Schmauß; Jörg Zimmermann; Jens Reimer; Eva Reininghaus; Ion-George Anghelescu; Volker Arolt; Bernhard T Baune; Carsten Konrad; Andreas Thiel; Andreas J Fallgatter; Vanessa Nieratschker; Christian Figge; Martin von Hagen; Manfred Koller; Thomas Becker; Moritz E Wigand; Markus Jäger; Detlef E Dietrich; Sebastian Stierl; Harald Scherk; Carsten Spitzer; Here Folkerts; Stephanie H Witt; Franziska Degenhardt; Andreas J Forstner; Marcella Rietschel; Markus M Nöthen; Jens Wiltfang; Peter Falkai; Thomas G Schulze; Sergi Papiol Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Laura Ospina-Pinillos; Tracey A Davenport; Alvaro Andres Navarro-Mancilla; Vanessa Wan Sze Cheng; Andrés Camilo Cardozo Alarcón; Andres M Rangel; German Eduardo Rueda-Jaimes; Carlos Gomez-Restrepo; Ian B Hickie Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2020-02-08
Authors: Ashleigh M Tickell; Cathrin Rohleder; Alexandra Garland; Yun Ju Christine Song; Joanne Sarah Carpenter; Kate Harel; Lisa Parker; Ian B Hickie; Elizabeth Scott Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Cathrin Rohleder; Yun Ju Christine Song; Jacob J Crouse; Tracey A Davenport; Frank Iorfino; Blake Hamilton; Natalia Zmicerevska; Alissa Nichles; Joanne S Carpenter; Ashleigh M Tickell; Chloe Wilson; Shane P Cross; Adam J Guastella; Dagmar Koethe; F Markus Leweke; Elizabeth M Scott; Ian B Hickie Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-06-07 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Javier Ortuño-Sierra; Rebeca Aritio-Solana; Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 3.390