Literature DB >> 30172217

Validation of an accelerometer for measurement of activity in frail older people.

Nethra Ganesh Chigateri1, Ngaire Kerse2, Laurian Wheeler2, Bruce MacDonald3, Jochen Klenk4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Specific gait parameters are associated with falls and injury. It is important to identify walking episodes in order to determine the associated gait parameters. Frail older people have a greater risk of falling due to increased probability of inactivity. Therefore, detection and analysis of their physical activities becomes significant. Furthermore, ascertainment of gait parameters and non-sedentary activities for frail older group is difficult in free living environments - an area which hasn't been explored much.
METHODS: Participants were 23 older people residing in independent-living retirement homes. Data was inertial sensor signals, attached to the L5 vertebral area using a belt, from scripted activities (a timed up and go, and sit to stand activities) and unscripted activities of daily living collected in a free-living environment. An algorithm designed to identify walking, standing/sitting and lying is applied to the uSense wearable accelerometer data which has been analysed by processing the raw data with a gait detection algorithm and the results were compared against annotated videos which served as the gold standard. Validity of gait assessment was based on the percentage of agreement between the analysed accelerometer data and the corresponding reference video with 100Hz sampling frequency and 0.01 frames/second.
RESULTS: The median overall agreement between the processed accelerometer data and the annotated video was a match of approximately 92.8% and 95.1% for walking episodes for unscripted and scripted activities respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: The tri-axial accelerometer with a sampling frequency of 100 Hz provides a valid measure of gait detection in frail older people aged above 75 years. Since a limited number of studies have reported the use of accelerometers for older people in a free-living context, performance evaluation and establishing the validity of body worn sensors for physical activity and gait recognition is the key goal achieved.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometers; Body worn sensors; Gait; Physical activity; Walking; Wearable device

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30172217     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  13 in total

Review 1.  A Roadmap to Inform Development, Validation and Approval of Digital Mobility Outcomes: The Mobilise-D Approach.

Authors:  Lynn Rochester; Claudia Mazzà; Arne Mueller; Brian Caulfield; Marie McCarthy; Clemens Becker; Ram Miller; Paolo Piraino; Marco Viceconti; Wilhelmus P Dartee; Judith Garcia-Aymerich; Aida A Aydemir; Beatrix Vereijken; Valdo Arnera; Nadir Ammour; Michael Jackson; Tilo Hache; Ronenn Roubenoff
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2020-11-26

2.  The validity of activity trackers is affected by walking speed: the criterion validity of Garmin Vivosmart® HR and StepWatch 3 for measuring steps at various walking speeds under controlled conditions.

Authors:  Frederik Rose Svarre; Mads Møller Jensen; Josephine Nielsen; Morten Villumsen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Monitoring Walking Activity with Wearable Technology in Rural-dwelling Older Adults in Tanzania: A Feasibility Study Nested within a Frailty Prevalence Study.

Authors:  Silvia Del Din; Emma Grace Lewis; William K Gray; Harry Collin; John Kissima; Lynn Rochester; Catherine Dotchin; Sarah Urasa; Richard Walker
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  Predictors of real-life mobility in community-dwelling older adults: an exploration based on a comprehensive framework for analyzing mobility.

Authors:  Eleftheria Giannouli; Michelle Pasquale Fillekes; Sabato Mellone; Robert Weibel; Otmar Bock; Wiebren Zijlstra
Journal:  Eur Rev Aging Phys Act       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 3.878

5.  Mobile Computing Technologies for Health and Mobility Assessment: Research Design and Results of the Timed Up and Go Test in Older Adults.

Authors:  Vasco Ponciano; Ivan Miguel Pires; Fernando Reinaldo Ribeiro; María Vanessa Villasana; Rute Crisóstomo; Maria Canavarro Teixeira; Eftim Zdravevski
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Activities of daily living with motion: A dataset with accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope data from mobile devices.

Authors:  Ivan Miguel Pires; Nuno M Garcia; Eftim Zdravevski; Petre Lameski
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2020-12-08

Review 7.  How wearable sensors have been utilised to evaluate frailty in older adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Grainne Vavasour; Oonagh M Giggins; Julie Doyle; Daniel Kelly
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Validation of a wireless patch sensor to monitor mobility tested in both an experimental and a hospital setup: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Niek Koenders; Joost P H Seeger; Teun van der Giessen; Ties J van den Hurk; Indy G M Smits; Anne M Tankink; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Thomas J Hoogeboom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Its Association with Functional Independence, Quality of Life and In-Hospital Course of Recovery in Elderly Patients with Proximal Femur Fractures: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Laureen V Marsault; Jesper Ryg; Carsten Fladmose Madsen; Anders Holsgaard-Larsen; Jens Lauritsen; Hagen Schmal
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 10.  The Use of Inertial Measurement Units for the Study of Free Living Environment Activity Assessment: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Sylvain Jung; Mona Michaud; Laurent Oudre; Eric Dorveaux; Louis Gorintin; Nicolas Vayatis; Damien Ricard
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.