Literature DB >> 30170964

Identifying research priorities for digital technology in mental health care: results of the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

Chris Hollis1, Stephanie Sampson2, Lucy Simons3, E Bethan Davies3, Rachel Churchill2, Victoria Betton4, Debbie Butler5, Kathy Chapman6, Katherine Easton7, Toto Anne Gronlund8, Thomas Kabir9, Mat Rawsthorne5, Elizabeth Rye10, André Tomlin11.   

Abstract

Digital technology, including the internet, smartphones, and wearables, provides the possibility to bridge the mental health treatment gap by offering flexible and tailored approaches to mental health care that are more accessible and potentially less stigmatising than those currently available. However, the evidence base for digital mental health interventions, including demonstration of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in real-world settings, remains inadequate. The James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership for digital technology in mental health care was established to identify research priorities that reflect the perspectives and unmet needs of people with lived experience of mental health problems and use of mental health services, their carers, and health-care practitioners. 644 participants contributed 1369 separate questions, which were reduced by qualitative thematic analysis into six overarching themes. Following removal of out-of-scope questions and a comprehensive search of existing evidence, 134 questions were verified as uncertainties suitable for research. These questions were then ranked online and in workshops by 628 participants to produce a shortlist of 26. The top ten research priorities, which were identified by consensus at a stakeholder workshop, should inform research policy and funding in this field. Identified priorities primarily relate to the safety and efficacy of digital technology interventions in comparison with face-to-face interventions, evidence of population reach, mechanisms of therapeutic change, and the ways in which the effectiveness of digital interventions in combination with human support might be optimised.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30170964     DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30296-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry        ISSN: 2215-0366            Impact factor:   27.083


  30 in total

1.  Digital Opportunities for Outcomes in Recovery Services (DOORS): A Pragmatic Hands-On Group Approach Toward Increasing Digital Health and Smartphone Competencies, Autonomy, Relatedness, and Alliance for Those With Serious Mental Illness.

Authors:  Liza Hoffman; Hannah Wisniewski; Ryan Hays; Philip Henson; Aditya Vaidyam; Victoria Hendel; Matcheri Keshavan; John Torous
Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.325

2.  Bridging the Digital Divide in Psychological Therapies: Observational Study of Engagement With the SlowMo Mobile App for Paranoia in Psychosis.

Authors:  Amy Hardy; Thomas Ward; Richard Emsley; Kathryn Greenwood; Daniel Freeman; David Fowler; Elizabeth Kuipers; Paul Bebbington; Philippa Garety
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-07-01

3.  Policy Recommendations for Preventing Problematic Internet Use in Schools: A Qualitative Study of Parental Perspectives.

Authors:  Melina A Throuvala; Mark D Griffiths; Mike Rennoldson; Daria J Kuss
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Digital Mental Health Intervention Plus Usual Care Compared With Usual Care Only and Usual Care Plus In-Person Psychological Counseling for Orthopedic Patients With Symptoms of Depression or Anxiety: Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ashwin J Leo; Matthew J Schuelke; Devyani M Hunt; J Philip Miller; Patricia A Areán; Abby L Cheng
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-05-04

5.  The Acceptability and Usability of Digital Health Interventions for Adults With Depression, Anxiety, and Somatoform Disorders: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.

Authors:  Shireen Patel; Athfah Akhtar; Sam Malins; Nicola Wright; Emma Rowley; Emma Young; Stephanie Sampson; Richard Morriss
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  A Virtual Agent to Support Individuals Living With Physical and Mental Comorbidities: Co-Design and Acceptability Testing.

Authors:  Katherine Easton; Stephen Potter; Remi Bec; Matthew Bennion; Heidi Christensen; Cheryl Grindell; Bahman Mirheidari; Scott Weich; Luc de Witte; Daniel Wolstenholme; Mark S Hawley
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Group based video-conferencing for adults with depression: findings from a user-led qualitative data analysis using participatory theme elicitation.

Authors:  Paul Best; Tracey McConnell; Gavin Davidson; Jennifer Badham; Ruth D Neill
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2019-12-05

8.  Digital technological interventions in mental health care.

Authors:  Kalpana Srivastava; Suprakash Chaudhury; Sana Dhamija; Jyoti Prakash; Kaushik Chatterjee
Journal:  Ind Psychiatry J       Date:  2021-03-15

Review 9.  Ethics and Law in Research on Algorithmic and Data-Driven Technology in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Piers Gooding; Timothy Kariotis
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2021-06-10

10.  Patients' Measurement Priorities for Remote Measurement Technologies to Aid Chronic Health Conditions: Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Sara Simblett; Faith Matcham; Hannah Curtis; Ben Greer; Ashley Polhemus; Jan Novák; Jose Ferrao; Peter Gamble; Matthew Hotopf; Vaibhav Narayan; Til Wykes
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.