Literature DB >> 30170909

New strategies of ovarian stimulation based on the concept of ovarian follicular waves: From conventional to random and double stimulation.

Giovanna Sighinolfi1, Sesh Kamal Sunkara2, Antonio La Marca3.   

Abstract

The theory of a multicyclic development of follicles during the menstrual cycle prompted new approaches to ovarian stimulation, such as starting gonadotrophins for ovarian stimulation at any time during the menstrual cycle or using double stimulation during it, with stimulation in both the follicular and luteal phases. Because of the asynchrony between endometrial receptivity and embryo development with a 'non-conventional start' stimulation, all the oocytes/embryos are generally cryopreserved and transferred subsequently. This deferred transfer policy is currently possible given the advances in vitrification techniques, with success rates comparable to those following transfer with 'fresh' embryos. New stimulation approaches, together with advanced cryopreservation techniques, allow for a total 'disarticulation' between the time of the menstrual cycle, ovarian stimulation start and embryo transfer. This new approach to ovarian stimulation is particularly useful for women seeking fertility preservation, especially where a shortened time to starting cancer treatment is desirable. Also, poor responders could benefit from the new stimulation protocols by continuing ovarian stimulation after the first oocyte retrieval, thereby obtaining more oocytes or embryos compared with the conventional approach.
Copyright © 2018 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double stimulation; Follicular waves; Luteal phase stimulation; Random-start controlled ovarian stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30170909     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  7 in total

1.  How effective are the non-conventional ovarian stimulation protocols in ART? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Demian Glujovsky; Romina Pesce; Mariana Miguens; Carlos E Sueldo; Karinna Lattes; Agustín Ciapponi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A report on three live births in women with poor ovarian response following intra-ovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP).

Authors:  Marzie Farimani; Safoura Heshmati; Jalal Poorolajal; Maryam Bahmanzadeh
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 3.  Fertility preservation for genetic diseases leading to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI).

Authors:  Antonio La Marca; Elisa Mastellari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist ovulation trigger-beyond OHSS prevention.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Castillo; Thor Haahr; María Martínez-Moya; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.384

Review 5.  Freeze-all, for whom, when, and how.

Authors:  Paula Celada; Ernesto Bosch
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.384

6.  DuoStim - a reproducible strategy to obtain more oocytes and competent embryos in a short time-frame aimed at fertility preservation and IVF purposes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Cecilia Petriglia; Alessandro Conforti; Carlo Alviggi; Nicolò Ubaldi; Sergio Ledda; Susanna Ferrero; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.384

7.  Mathematical Modeling and Simulation Provides Evidence for New Strategies of Ovarian Stimulation.

Authors:  Sophie Fischer; Rainald Ehrig; Stefan Schäfer; Enrico Tronci; Toni Mancini; Marcel Egli; Fabian Ille; Tillmann H C Krüger; Brigitte Leeners; Susanna Röblitz
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.