Literature DB >> 30170883

Minimally invasive salvage lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancer patients: A single institution series.

Valerio Gallotta1, Maria Teresa Giudice2, Carmine Conte2, Alicia Vazquez Sarandeses3, Marco D'Indinosante2, Alex Federico2, Lucia Tortorella4, Maria Vittoria Carbone2, Salvatore Gueli Alletti4, Giuseppe Vizzielli4, Barbara Costantini4, Giovanni Scambia2, Gabriella Ferrandina2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: to assess the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in the management of lymph-nodal recurrences of gynecological cancers, in terms of surgical and oncological outcomes.
METHODS: we retrospectively collected patients with isolated lymph-nodal recurrent disease of gynecological malignancies who underwent to minimally invasive lymphadenectomy at Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth in Rome (Italy), from January 2013 to November 2017.
RESULTS: Forty patients were considered eligible (31 LPS, 9 Robot); 24 (60.0%) with an ovarian cancer, 8 (20.0%) with a cervical cancer and 8 (20.0%) with an endometrial cancer recurrence. The most frequent site of lymph-nodal recurrence was represented by the aortic region (47.5%), while 18 patients (45.0%) experiencing pelvic lymph-nodal recurrence, 2 (5.0%) both pelvic and aortic relapse, and only 1 (2.5%) had an hepato-celiac lymph node recurrence. No patient required a laparotomic conversion. Median operative time was 220 min, median EBL was 80 mL, and median post-operative hospital stay was 2 days. There were 2 (5.0%) intra-operative and 4 (10.0%) post-operative complications, of which 2 were grade 3. The median follow-up was 22.5 months, and during this time 15 patients showed another relapse with a median time to progression of 12 months. Seven women died because of the disease. The 2-year post-relapse disease-free survival (PR-DFS) was 54.7%, and the 2-year post-relapse overall survival (PR-OS) was 79.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience minimally invasive surgery is a valid therapeutic approach in very select patients with localized lymph-nodal recurrence of gynecological cancers, with benefits about peri and post-operative morbidities and without compromising their oncological outcome.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Innovative technologies in surgery; Minimally invasive lymphadenectomy; Personalized medicine; Recurrent gynecological cancers; Robotic surgery; Secondary cytoreduction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30170883     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  11 in total

Review 1.  Laparotomy vs. minimally invasive surgery for ovarian cancer recurrence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stefano Uccella; Massimo P Franchi; Stefano Cianci; Pier Carlo Zorzato; Francesca Bertoli; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Fabio Ghezzi; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

2.  Prognostic factors for survival in patients with lung metastases from gynaecological tract cancers.

Authors:  Marco Chiappetta; Valerio Gallotta; Luca Pogliani; Edoardo Zanfrini; Anna Fagotti; Gabriella Ferrandina; Francesco Fanfani; Dania Nachira; Elisa Meacci; Maria Teresa Congedo; Filippo Lococo; Maria Teresa Giudice; Giovanni Scambia; Stefano Margaritora
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-08-03

3.  Therapeutic value of surgical paraaortic staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: a multicenter cohort analysis from the FRANCOGYN study group.

Authors:  Yohann Dabi; Vanille Simon; Xavier Carcopino; Sofiane Bendifallah; Lobna Ouldamer; Vincent Lavoue; Geoffroy Canlorbe; Emilie Raimond; Charles Coutant; Olivier Graesslin; Pierre Collinet; Alexandre Bricou; Emile Daraï; Cyrille Huchon; Marcos Ballester; Bassam Haddad; Cyril Touboul
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  The efficacy of secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer in Tian-model low-risk patients.

Authors:  Makiko So; Taito Miyamoto; Ryusuke Murakami; Kaoru Abiko; Junzo Hamanishi; Tsukasa Baba; Masaki Mandai
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Comparison of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Women With Presumed Stage I-II High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  E Sun Paik; Seung Hun Baek; Jun Hyeok Kang; Soo Young Jeong; Myeong Seon Kim; Woo Young Kim; Yoo-Young Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Tae-Joong Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  The extent of aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer impacts on survival.

Authors:  Antoni Llueca; Javier Escrig; Antonio Gil-Moreno; Virginia Benito; Alicia Hernández; Berta Díaz-Feijoo
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Surgical Outcomes of Transperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Compared With Extraperitoneal Approach in Gynecologic Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kun-Peng Li; Xian-Zhong Deng; Tao Wu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-21

8.  Systematic Lymphadenectomy and Oncological Outcomes of Women With Apparent Early-Stage Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Endometrium: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yong Tian; Lin Ran; Yi Liu; Yu Xu; Juan Shen; Gong-Sheng Mi; Feng-Mei Ke
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  The Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Extraperitoneal Approach for Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy: A Technique Note and Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Shiyi Peng; Ying Zheng; Fan Yang; Kana Wang; Sijing Chen; Yawen Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-15

10.  Risk Factor Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Mu Xu; Xiaoyan Xie; Liangzhi Cai; Yongjin Xie; Qiao Gao; Pengming Sun
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.