Literature DB >> 30170757

Results of a health systems approach to identify barriers to population-based cervical and colorectal cancer screening programmes in six European countries.

Eleanor Turnbull1, Jennifer Priaulx1, Inge M C M de Kok2, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar2, Ahti Anttila3, Tytti Sarkeala3, Carlo Senore4, Nereo Segnan4, Marcell Csanádi5, János Pitter5, Dominika Novak Mlakar6, Urska Ivanus6, Piret Veerus7, Harry J de Koning2, Martin McKee8.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify barriers to effective cervical and colorectal cancers screening programmes in Europe. The Barriers to Effective Screening Tool (BEST), based on a health systems approach, was completed by teams of three to six experts on cancer screening in each of the six countries involved in leading the EU-TOPIA project (TOwards imProved screening for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer In All of Europe). While the basic components of screening systems and the challenges they face, such as low participation, are similar, there are also many differences, both in the structures underpinning particular functions, such as maintenance of populationregisters and monitoring outcomes, and the ways that they operate. Many of these lie outside the strict organisational boundaries of screening programmes. BEST offers a means to identify and prioritise issues for further detailed exploration. The holistic health systems approach to assessing barriers differs from previous approaches. Those focus on individual characteristics that determine participation. The approach described here provides additional opportunities to improve outcomes with measures that are largely within the control of those managing the health system.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; Cervical cancer; Colo-rectal cancer; Health systems

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30170757     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  3 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach.

Authors:  Sharifah Saffinas Syed Soffian; Azmawati Mohammed Nawi; Rozita Hod; Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf; Huan-Keat Chan; Muhammad Radzi Abu Hassan
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 2.  A roadmap for a comprehensive control of cervical cancer in Poland: integration of available solutions into current practice in primary and secondary prevention.

Authors:  Andrzej Nowakowski; Marc Arbyn; Maryla H Turkot; Paulina Wieszczy; Kinga Miłosz; Michał F Kamiński; Joanna Didkowska; Mariusz Bidziński; Włodzimierz Olszewski; Mirosław Wielgoś; Maciej Krzakowski; Ernest Kuchar; Jan Walewski
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.164

3.  Decreased Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Incidence-Based Mortality in the Screening-Age Population of Ontario.

Authors:  Lawrence F Paszat; Rinku Sutradhar; Elyse Corn; Jill Tinmouth; Nancy N Baxter; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.