Madelaine Plourde1, Ahmed Jad2, Patrick Dorn3, Kyla Harris3, Aneil Mujoomdar3, Harry Henteleff3, Daniel French3, Drew Bethune3. 1. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital - Victoria Campus, Halifax, Canada. Electronic address: madelaine.plourde@nshealth.ca. 2. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital - Victoria Campus, Halifax, Canada. 3. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital - Victoria Campus, Halifax, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Digital chest drainage devices objectively measure airflow to guide chest tube management. There are contradictory results regarding their utility in reducing length of stay and chest tube duration. The objective of this study was to compare digital and analog devices in patients undergoing anatomic lung resection. METHODS: A single-institution randomized trial was conducted. Patients undergoing anatomic lung resection between November 2013 and July 2016 were randomized to digital or analog devices. Chest tubes were managed using a standardized protocol. Hospital length of stay and chest tube duration were primary outcomes. Chest tube clamping, number of chest roentgenograms, and chest tube reinsertion were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The study randomized 215 patients, with 107 in the digital group and 108 in the analog group. There was no significant difference in outcomes for length of stay (p = 1), chest tube duration (p = 0.71), number of chest roentgenograms performed (p = 0.78) or need for chest tube reinsertion (p = 0.21). The only significant finding was a higher number of patients who had their chest tubes clamped before removal, with 47% in the analog group and 19% in the digital group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Digital devices did not result in reduced chest tube duration or hospital length of stay. Approximately one half of the patients in the analog group had their chest tubes clamped before removal because of uncertainty in air leak assessment. Digital devices provided objective quantification of air leaks that decreased chest tube clamping.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Digital chest drainage devices objectively measure airflow to guide chest tube management. There are contradictory results regarding their utility in reducing length of stay and chest tube duration. The objective of this study was to compare digital and analog devices in patients undergoing anatomic lung resection. METHODS: A single-institution randomized trial was conducted. Patients undergoing anatomic lung resection between November 2013 and July 2016 were randomized to digital or analog devices. Chest tubes were managed using a standardized protocol. Hospital length of stay and chest tube duration were primary outcomes. Chest tube clamping, number of chest roentgenograms, and chest tube reinsertion were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The study randomized 215 patients, with 107 in the digital group and 108 in the analog group. There was no significant difference in outcomes for length of stay (p = 1), chest tube duration (p = 0.71), number of chest roentgenograms performed (p = 0.78) or need for chest tube reinsertion (p = 0.21). The only significant finding was a higher number of patients who had their chest tubes clamped before removal, with 47% in the analog group and 19% in the digital group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Digital devices did not result in reduced chest tube duration or hospital length of stay. Approximately one half of the patients in the analog group had their chest tubes clamped before removal because of uncertainty in air leak assessment. Digital devices provided objective quantification of air leaks that decreased chest tube clamping.