Literature DB >> 30169828

Animal factors associated with core body temperature of nonlactating dairy cows during summer.

Alexandre L A Scanavez1, Breno Fragomeni2, Luis G D Mendonça1.   

Abstract

The primary objectives of the current study were to investigate animal factors associated with core body temperature (CBT) and to determine the time of the day in which CBT assessment best describes the magnitude of hyperthermia throughout the day of heat-stressed dry cows. The secondary objective was to develop a predictive model for CBT of dry cows. Nonlactating Holstein cows (n = 105) with 250 to 260 d of gestation from 2 commercial dairies were enrolled in the study during summer. During 4 consecutive days, CBT from all cows was recorded in 5-min intervals and average CBT was calculated for each cow. In addition, mean, maximum, minimum, and standard deviation of daily CBT were calculated and using these measures cows were categorized as having high temperature (HT) or low temperature (LT) based on the median values. Cows carrying twins had greater (P < 0.01) CBT than cows bearing singletons (39.07 ± 0.07 vs. 38.84 ± 0.03 °C). Average CBT decreased (P < 0.01) 0.015 ± 0.004 °C for each 1-d increase in gestation length. Cows in Dairy A tended (P = 0.09) to have lower CBT than cows in Dairy B (38.91 ± 0.04 vs. 39.00 ± 0.06 °C). Season of birth, lactation number, body condition score category, previous projected 305-d mature equivalent milk yield, days in milk at dry-off, days after dry-off at enrollment, days of gestation at enrollment, and calf sex were not associated (P > 0.12) with CBT. Principal component analyses showed that 71% of the variance of CBT was explained by the first principal component alone, which was correlated with mean CBT (r = 0.99). Among all time points assessed, CBT recorded at 2215 h had the highest correlation with the first principal component (r = 0.93). The best agreement for classifying cows as HT or LT was between mean daily CBT and assessment at 2215 h (k = 0.73). The model that resulted in best predictivity (0.56) of average CBT included the following variables: dairy, gestation length, and twinning. In conclusion, findings from the present study suggest that CBT assessed between 250 and 260 d of gestation is negatively associated with gestation length and cows bearing twins have greater CBT than singletons. Our results indicate that the best time of the day to evaluate severity of heat stress in dry cows is 2215 h. Predictive models for CBT of dry cows should include dairy, twinning, and gestation length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30169828      PMCID: PMC6276561          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  31 in total

1.  Late-gestation heat stress abatement on performance and behavior of Holstein dairy cows.

Authors:  M T Karimi; G R Ghorbani; S Kargar; J K Drackley
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Cows exposed to heat stress during fetal life exhibit improved thermal tolerance.

Authors:  B M S Ahmed; U Younas; T O Asar; S Dikmen; P J Hansen; G E Dahl
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Body temperature and endocrine interactions before and after calving in beef cows.

Authors:  M A Lammoglia; R A Bellows; R E Short; S E Bellows; E G Bighorn; J S Stevenson; R D Randel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Invited review: Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare.

Authors:  Liam Polsky; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Association between 4-day vaginal temperature assessment during the dry period and performance in the subsequent lactation of dairy cows during the warm season.

Authors:  A L A Scanavez; B Fragomeni; L Rocha; B E Voelz; L E Hulbert; L G D Mendonça
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Factors affecting days open, gestation length, and calving interval in Florida dairy cattle.

Authors:  H M Silva; C J Wilcox; W W Thatcher; R B Becker; D Morse
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 7.  Major advances in disease prevention in dairy cattle.

Authors:  S J LeBlanc; K D Lissemore; D F Kelton; T F Duffield; K E Leslie
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 8.  Dry matter intake and energy balance in the transition period.

Authors:  Ric R Grummer; Doug G Mashek; A Hayirli
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.357

9.  Cooling cows efficiently with water spray: Behavioral, physiological, and production responses to sprinklers at the feed bunk.

Authors:  Jennifer M Chen; Karin E Schütz; Cassandra B Tucker
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Individual differences in normal body temperature: longitudinal big data analysis of patient records.

Authors:  Ziad Obermeyer; Jasmeet K Samra; Sendhil Mullainathan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-12-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Physiological, health, lactation, and reproductive traits of cooled dairy cows classified as having high or low core body temperature during the dry period1.

Authors:  Alexandre L A Scanavez; Benjamin E Voelz; Joao G N Moraes; Jonathan A Green; Luis G D Mendonça
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.