Literature DB >> 30169740

COach2Quit: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personal Carbon Monoxide Monitor for Smoking Cessation.

Nandita Krishnan1, Jessica L Elf2,3, Sandy Chon3, Jonathan E Golub1,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mobile phone-based messaging support and biomarker feedback independently show evidence of increasing an individual's likelihood of quitting smoking. However, the combination of these two strategies to facilitate smoking cessation has not been adequately explored.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in Baltimore, Maryland, to assess the efficacy of COach2Quit, a smartphone application that provides exhaled carbon monoxide readings with message support. The primary outcome was self-reported and biochemically verified smoking cessation at 30-day follow-up. Secondary outcomes were reduction in smoking, motivation to quit, and engagement and satisfaction with COach2Quit. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted.
RESULTS: Adult smokers were randomized 1:1 to receive brief advice and COach2Quit (intervention, n = 50) or brief advice only (control, n = 52). Thirteen participants were lost to follow-up. At 30-day follow-up, one participant in each arm quit smoking. Median change in carbon monoxide levels (in parts per million (ppm)) (intervention: -3.0 [interquartile range (IQR) -12.0, 2.0]; control: -2.5 [IQR -9.0, 2.0]) and median change in number of cigarettes smoked per day (intervention: -5.5 [IQR -14.0, -1.0]; control: -6.0 [IQR -10.0, -2.0]) was similar between study arms. There was no significant difference in mean percent change in the Reasons for Quitting scale score (intervention: 6.3 [95% confidence interval = -2.2% to 14.8%]; control: -3.6 [95% confidence interval = -9.2% to 2.1%]). A majority (n = 32, 91%) of participants liked having COach2Quit to help them quit smoking.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in smoking cessation, smoking reduction, and motivation to quit between study arms. However, high satisfaction with the COach2Quit application indicates its feasibility and acceptability as a smoking cessation tool. IMPLICATIONS: Smoking is the leading preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Although counseling and pharmacotherapy are efficacious for smoking cessation, they are not easily accessible or desirable to all smokers, highlighting the need for identifying other interventions. There is evidence for the efficacy of mobile phone-based messaging support for smoking cessation. However, there is limited research on the efficacy of biomarker feedback, much less interventions that combine these two approaches. This research contributes to filling this gap and identifying novel interventions to facilitate smoking cessation.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30169740      PMCID: PMC6821366          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  8 in total

1.  Are biomarkers useful treatment aids for promoting health behavior change? An empirical review.

Authors:  Jennifer B McClure
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for smoking cessation.

Authors:  S Curry; E H Wagner; L C Grothaus
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1990-06

3.  Immediate and short-term impact of a brief motivational smoking intervention using a biomedical risk assessment: the Get PHIT trial.

Authors:  Jennifer B McClure; Evette Ludman; Lou Grothaus; Chester Pabiniak; Julie Richards; Amy Mohelnitzky
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 4.  Carbon monoxide in exhaled breath testing and therapeutics.

Authors:  Stefan W Ryter; Augustine M K Choi
Journal:  J Breath Res       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.262

5.  A content analysis of popular smartphone apps for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Lorien C Abroms; J Lee Westmaas; Jeuneviette Bontemps-Jones; Rathna Ramani; Jenelle Mellerson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  A randomized trial of Text2Quit: a text messaging program for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Lorien C Abroms; Ashley L Boal; Samuel J Simmens; Judith A Mendel; Richard A Windsor
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): a single-blind, randomised trial.

Authors:  Caroline Free; Rosemary Knight; Steven Robertson; Robyn Whittaker; Phil Edwards; Weiwei Zhou; Anthony Rodgers; John Cairns; Michael G Kenward; Ian Roberts
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Siobhan O'Connor; Peter Hanlon; Catherine A O'Donnell; Sonia Garcia; Julie Glanville; Frances S Mair
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.796

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Digital Health and Addiction.

Authors:  Lisa A Marsch
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2020-07-07

2.  Development, validation and transfer to clinical practice of a mobile application for the treatment of smoking.

Authors:  Raquel Cobos-Campos; Antxon Apiñaniz; Arantza Sáez de Lafuente; Naiara Parraza
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.206

3.  Mobile, Remote, and Individual Focused: Comparing Breath Carbon Monoxide Readings and Abstinence Between Smartphone-Enabled and Stand-Alone Monitors.

Authors:  Breanna M Tuck; Joshua L Karelitz; Rachel L Tomko; Jennifer Dahne; Patrick Cato; Erin A McClure
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Initial Assessment of a Comprehensive Digital Smoking Cessation Program That Incorporates a Mobile App, Breath Sensor, and Coaching: Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jennifer D Marler; Craig A Fujii; David S Utley; Lydia J Tesfamariam; Joseph A Galanko; Heather Patrick
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Durability of Abstinence After Completing a Comprehensive Digital Smoking Cessation Program Incorporating a Mobile App, Breath Sensor, and Coaching: Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jennifer D Marler; Craig A Fujii; Joseph A Galanko; Daniel J Balbierz; David S Utley
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Mobile Apps to Reduce Tobacco, Alcohol, and Illicit Drug Use: Systematic Review of the First Decade.

Authors:  Petra Karin Staiger; Renee O'Donnell; Paul Liknaitzky; Rachel Bush; Joanna Milward
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Feature-Level Analysis of a Smoking Cessation Smartphone App Based on a Positive Psychology Approach: Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Bettina B Hoepper; Kaitlyn R Siegel; Hannah A Carlon; Christopher W Kahler; Elyse R Park; Steven Trevor Taylor; Hazel V Simpson; Susanne S Hoeppner
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-07-28

8.  The mobile-phone-based iCOTM Smokerlyzer®: Comparison with the piCO+ Smokerlyzer® among smokers undergoing methadone-maintained therapy.

Authors:  Hsui Yang Wong; Muniswary Subramaniyan; Chris Bullen; A N Amer Siddiq; Mahmoud Danaee; Anne Yee
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.600

9.  Mobile Apps for Health Behavior Change in Physical Activity, Diet, Drug and Alcohol Use, and Mental Health: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Madison Milne-Ives; Ching Lam; Caroline De Cock; Michelle Helena Van Velthoven; Edward Meinert
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.773

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.