Literature DB >> 30169699

Microsimulation model to predict incremental value of biomarkers added to prognostic models.

Karol M Pencina1, Ralph B D'Agostino2, Ramachandran S Vasan3, Michael J Pencina4.   

Abstract

It is unclear to what extent simulated versions of real data can be used to assess potential value of new biomarkers added to prognostic risk models. Using data on 4522 women and 3969 men who contributed information to the Framingham CVD risk prediction tool, we develop a simulation model that allows assessment of the added contribution of new biomarkers. The simulated model matches closely the one obtained using real data: discrimination area under the curve (AUC) on simulated vs actual data is 0.800 vs 0.799 in women and 0.778 vs 0.776 in men. Positive correlation with standard risk factors decreases the impact of new biomarkers (ΔAUC 0.002-0.024), but negative correlation leads to stronger effects (ΔAUC 0.026-0.101) than no correlation (ΔAUC 0.003-0.051). We suggest that researchers construct simulation models similar to the one proposed here before embarking on larger, expensive biomarker studies based on actual data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30169699      PMCID: PMC6915817          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocy108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  13 in total

1.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Karol M Pencina; A Cecile J W Janssens; Philip Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Development and Validation of a Protein-Based Risk Score for Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Peter Ganz; Bettina Heidecker; Kristian Hveem; Christian Jonasson; Shintaro Kato; Mark R Segal; David G Sterling; Stephen A Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  C-reactive protein and parental history improve global cardiovascular risk prediction: the Reynolds Risk Score for men.

Authors:  Paul M Ridker; Nina P Paynter; Nader Rifai; J Michael Gaziano; Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  When does combining markers improve classification performance and what are implications for practice?

Authors:  Aasthaa Bansal; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael J Pencina; Philip A Wolf; Mark Cobain; Joseph M Massaro; William B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary: Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (Constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts).

Authors:  Ian Graham; Dan Atar; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Gudrun Boysen; Gunilla Burell; Renata Cifkova; Jean Dallongeville; Guy De Backer; Shah Ebrahim; Bjørn Gjelsvik; Christoph Herrmann-Lingen; Arno Hoes; Steve Humphries; Mike Knapton; Joep Perk; Silvia G Priori; Kalevi Pyorala; Zeljko Reiner; Luis Ruilope; Susana Sans-Menendez; Wilma Scholte op Reimer; Peter Weissberg; David Wood; John Yarnell; Jose Luis Zamorano; Edmond Walma; Tony Fitzgerald; Marie Therese Cooney; Alexandra Dudina
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Mark A Hlatky; Philip Greenland; Donna K Arnett; Christie M Ballantyne; Michael H Criqui; Mitchell S V Elkind; Alan S Go; Frank E Harrell; Yuling Hong; Barbara V Howard; Virginia J Howard; Priscilla Y Hsue; Christopher M Kramer; Joseph P McConnell; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Christopher J O'Donnell; Sidney C Smith; Peter W F Wilson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  C-reactive protein and reclassification of cardiovascular risk in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Peter W F Wilson; Michael Pencina; Paul Jacques; Jacob Selhub; Ralph D'Agostino; Christopher J O'Donnell
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2008-11-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  6-year change in high sensitivity cardiac troponin T and the risk of atrial fibrillation in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities cohort.

Authors:  Linzi Li; Elizabeth Selvin; Ron C Hoogeveen; Elsayed Z Soliman; Lin Y Chen; Faye L Norby; Alvaro Alonso
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 3.287

2.  Assess the Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of LACE and HOSPITAL Re-Admission Prediction Models as a Risk Management Tool for Home Care Patients: An Evaluation Study of a Medical Center Affiliated Home Care Unit in Taiwan.

Authors:  Mei-Chin Su; Yi-Jen Wang; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Shiao-Hui Chiu; Hsiao-Ting Chang; Mei-Shu Huang; Li-Hui Hu; Chu-Chuan Li; Su-Ju Yang; Jau-Ching Wu; Yu-Chun Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.