Literature DB >> 30169694

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases at the Extreme Ends of the Spine: Imaging-Based Outcomes for Cervical and Sacral Metastases.

K Liang Zeng1, Sten Myrehaug1, Hany Soliman1, Chia-Lin Tseng1, Eshetu G Atenafu2, Mikki Campbell1, Salman Faruqi1, Young K Lee1, Mark Ruschin1, Leodante da Costa3, Victor Yang3, Julian Spears4, Chris Heyn5, Pejman Jabehdar Maralani5, Cari Whyne6, Albert Yee7, Arjun Sahgal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The unique anatomy and biomechanical features of the cervical spine and sacrum may impact treatment outcomes following spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Current data for spine metastases are not specific for these locations.
OBJECTIVE: To report imaging-based SBRT outcomes to cervical and sacral metastases.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our prospective spine SBRT database for cervical and sacral metastases. Patients were followed at 2- to 3-mo intervals with a clinical visit and full spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and we report overall survival (OS), vertebral compression fracture (VCF), and MR imaging-based local control (LC) rates.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients and 93 treated spinal segments were identified. Fifty-six segments were within the cervical spine and 37 within the sacrum, the median follow-up was 14.4 and 19.5 mo, and the median total dose/number of fractions was 24 Gy/2, respectively. Cumulative LC at 1 and 2 yr were 94.5% and 92.7% for the cervical cohort, and 86.5% and 78.7% in the sacral cohort, respectively. Lack of posterior spinal element involvement in the cervical spine (P < .0001) and absence of epidural disease (hazard ratio 0.275, 95% confidence interval 0.076-0.989, P = .048) in the sacral cohort predicted LC. Median OS was 16.3 and 28.5 mo in the cervical spine and sacrum cohorts, respectively. Two cases of sacral VCF, 1 brachial plexopathy, and 1 lumbar-sacral plexopathy were observed.
CONCLUSION: Although high rates of LC were observed, strategies specific to the sacrum may require further optimization.
Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spine; Local control; Sacrum; Spine; Stereotactic body radiotherapy; Vertebral compression fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30169694     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  5 in total

1.  A comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastases to the sacral spine and treatment of the thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  Roman O Kowalchuk; Michael R Waters; K Martin Richardson; Kelly Spencer; James M Larner; Jason P Sheehan; William H McAllister; Charles R Kersh
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2020

2.  Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yining Gong; Lingyi Xu; Hongqing Zhuang; Liang Jiang; Feng Wei; Zhongjun Liu; Yan Li; Miao Yu; Kaiwen Ni; Xiaoguang Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 3.  Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (SFRT) For Bone Metastases: Patient Selection And Perspectives.

Authors:  Mauro Loi; Joost J Nuyttens; Isacco Desideri; Daniela Greto; Lorenzo Livi
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 4.  An introductory review of robotically assisted surgical systems.

Authors:  Francesco Cepolina; Roberto P Razzoli
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.483

5.  Recursive Partitioning Analysis for Local Control Achieved With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Liver, Spine, or Lymph Nodes.

Authors:  Roman O Kowalchuk; Michael R Waters; Sunil W Dutta; Marie L Mack; K Martin Richardson; Kelly Spencer; Kara D Romano; James M Larner; Jason P Sheehan; C Ronald Kersh
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-11-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.