Literature DB >> 30169446

Patient and Practice Trends in Total Ankle Replacement and Tibiotalar Arthrodesis in the United States From 2007 to 2013.

Venus Vakhshori1, Andrew F Sabour, Ram K Alluri, George F Hatch, Eric W Tan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Both total ankle replacement (TAR) and tibiotalar arthrodesis (TTA) are used in the surgical management of ankle arthritis. Over the past decade, TAR instrumentation, techniques, and implants have improved, making the procedure more reliable and reproducible, thus making TAR more common.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2007 to 2013 was used to obtain data on patients elder than 50 years who underwent either TAR or TTA. Differences in temporal, demographic, and diagnosis trends between TAR and TTA were analyzed.
RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2013, 15,060 patients underwent TAR and 35,096 underwent TTA. Patients undergoing TTA had significantly more comorbidities (2.17 versus 1.55; P < 0.001). The share of TAR performed increased significantly from 2007 (14%) to 2013 (45%) (P < 0.001). From 2007 to 2013, we found a 12-fold increase in the odds of having a TAR for patients with posttraumatic osteoarthritis (P < 0.001), a 4.9-fold increase for those with primary osteoarthritis, and a 3.1-fold increase for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Over the past decade, the frequency of TAR has increased, particularly in patients with posttraumatic arthritis and osteoarthritis. Surgeons still perform TAR in healthier patients compared with TTA; however, because surgeons become more experienced with the technique, patients are undergoing TAR at a markedly higher rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: retrospective comparative study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30169446     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  7 in total

1.  Trends in Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Publications.

Authors:  Brian Sleasman; Caroline Chen; Alex M Caughman; Caroline Hoch; Daniel Scott; Christopher E Gross
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  High Reoperation Rate in Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Young Patients.

Authors:  Christian Stadler; Matthias Luger; Stella Stevoska; Manuel Gahleitner; Lorenz Pisecky; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan; Matthias C Klotz
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.430

3.  Survival of primary ankle replacements: data from global joint registries.

Authors:  Thomas A Perry; Alan Silman; David Culliford; Lucy Gates; Nigel Arden; Catherine Bowen
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Comparison of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate skin adhesive and interrupted polypropylene sutures for wound closure in total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gun-Woo Lee; Woo Kyoung Kwak; Keun-Bae Lee
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Two-Year Revision Rates in Total Ankle Replacement Versus Ankle Arthrodesis: A Population-Based Propensity-Score-Matched Comparison from New York State and California.

Authors:  Per-Henrik Randsborg; Hongying Jiang; Jialin Mao; Vincent Devlin; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Raquel Peat; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2022-04-04

6.  Differences Between Total Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis in Post-operative Complications and Reoperations at 30 Days and One Year.

Authors:  Senthil Sambandam; Philip Serbin; Dietrich Riepen; Vikram A Aggarwal; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Dane Wukich
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-02

7.  Adverse events related to total ankle replacement devices: an analysis of reports to the United States Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Karim Mahmoud; Sreenivasulu Metikala; Kathryn M O'Connor; Daniel C Farber
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.075

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.