Literature DB >> 30168878

Accounting for employee health: The productivity cost of leading health risks.

Tamara D Street1,2, Sarah J Lacey1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: "Workplace health promotion and protection" broadly refers to an integrated approach to workplace health and safety initiatives. There are substantial benefits to adopting such an approach, including the potential for: improvements to individual employees' health and well-being; increased productivity; and reduced safety risks and expenses. Yet many employers remain reluctant to shift from traditional safety initiatives and spending. This paper aims to demonstrate the value of investing in an integrated health promotion and protection approach by calculating the productivity costs associated with 11 modifiable health risks and 14 chronic conditions in an Australian mining company.
METHOD: Eight hundred and ninety-seven employees participated in a self-report health survey aimed at investigating employee health behaviours, health conditions and productivity.
RESULTS: Overall, modifiable health risks and chronic health conditions were calculated to contribute to an estimated $22.15 million (AUD) and $7.95 million (AUD) in lost productivity per 1000 employees per annum, respectively. Although employee stress was identified as the third highest prevalence health risk across the employee sample (at 42%), it accounted for the highest financial burden.
CONCLUSION: Employee health plays a vital role in the profitability, productivity, and safety outcomes of an organisation. For modifiable health risks and chronic conditions, ailments that affected cognition resulted in the highest financial burden (ie, stress and migraine headaches). SO WHAT?: These findings make a strong financial and business case for the integration of preventative health and safety initiatives, with particular emphasis on modifiable health risk behaviours.
© 2018 Australian Health Promotion Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behaviour change; evaluation methods; evidence based practice; health behaviours; workplaces

Year:  2018        PMID: 30168878     DOI: 10.1002/hpja.200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot J Austr        ISSN: 1036-1073


  6 in total

1.  Pre-Health Professional Perceptions: Should a Formal Stress Relief Program Be Implemented in the Workplace?

Authors:  Matthew S Mosca; Lauren Grossman
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2019-12

2.  Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Lpc-37® improves psychological and physiological markers of stress and anxiety in healthy adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and parallel clinical trial (the Sisu study).

Authors:  Elaine Patterson; Síle M Griffin; Alvin Ibarra; Emilia Ellsiepen; Juliane Hellhammer
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2020-11-24

Review 3.  Mental health in mine workers: a literature review.

Authors:  José Matamala Pizarro; Francisco Aguayo Fuenzalida
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.707

4.  Hotel building design, occupants' health and performance in response to COVID 19.

Authors:  Deepak Bangwal; Jyotsana Suyal; Rupesh Kumar
Journal:  Int J Hosp Manag       Date:  2022-04-05

5.  Cost of Health-Related Work Productivity Loss among Fly-In Fly-Out Mining Workers in Australia.

Authors:  Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah Asare; Marshall Makate; Daniel Powell; Dominika Kwasnicka; Suzanne Robinson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Employee Stress, Reduced Productivity, and Interest in a Workplace Health Program: A Case Study from the Australian Mining Industry.

Authors:  Tamara D Street; Sarah J Lacey; Klaire Somoray
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.