Literature DB >> 30168769

Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for prosthetic hip re-infection.

T S Brown1, K A Fehring2, M Ollivier3, T M Mabry3, A D Hanssen3, M P Abdel3.   

Abstract

Aims: Recurrent infection following two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication. The purpose of this study was to report the survival of repeat two-stage revision hip arthroplasty, describe complications, and identify risk factors for failure. Patients and
Methods: We retrospectively identified 19 hips (19 patients) that had undergone repeat two-stage revision THA for infection between 2000 to 2013. There were seven female patients (37%) and the mean age was 60 years (30 to 85). Survival free from revision was assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis. The patients were classified according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) system, and risk factors for failure were identified. Mean follow-up was four years (2 to 11).
Results: Gram-positive bacteria were responsible for 16/17 (94%) of the re-infections where microbes were identified. Following the repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty, survival free from any revision was 74% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56% to 96%, 14 at risk) at two years and 45% (95% CI 25% to 75%, five at risk) at five years. Failure to control infection resulted in re-operation or revision in 42%A of patients (8/19). Survival free from revision was not dependent on host grade.
Conclusion: Re-infection after two-stage exchange hip arthroplasty for PJI presents a challenging scenario. Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty has a low survival free from revision at five years (45%) and a high rate of re-infection (42%). Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1157-61.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Failed two-stage exchange arthroplasty; Prosthetic joint infection; Revision total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30168769     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2018-0470.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  5 in total

1.  Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for recurrent periprosthetic hip or knee infection: what are the chances for success?

Authors:  A C Steinicke; J Schwarze; G Gosheger; B Moellenbeck; T Ackmann; C Theil
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Classifications in Brief: The McPherson Classification of Periprosthetic Infection.

Authors:  Adam Coughlan; Fraser Taylor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Periprosthetic Joint Infection Caused by Gram-Positive Versus Gram-Negative Bacteria: Lipopolysaccharide, but not Lipoteichoic Acid, Exerts Adverse Osteoclast-Mediated Effects on the Bone.

Authors:  Mei-Feng Chen; Chih-Hsiang Chang; Chih-Chien Hu; Ying-Yu Wu; Yuhan Chang; Steve W N Ueng
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  The change in plasma D-dimer does not help to guide the timing of reimplantation in two stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Thomas Ackmann; Jan Schwarze; Georg Gosheger; Tom Schmidt-Braekling; Kristian Nikolaus Schneider; Ralf Dieckmann; Sebastian Klingebiel; Burkhard Moellenbeck; Christoph Theil
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Failure analysis of articulating polymethyl methacrylate spacers in two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maxime Jaubert; Marie Le Baron; Christophe Jacquet; Antoine Couvreur; Maxime Fabre-Aubrespy; Xavier Flecher; Matthieu Ollivier; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.