Literature DB >> 30168756

Biomechanical evaluation of two methods of fixation of a flexor hallucis longus tendon graft.

E Benca1, M Willegger1, F Wenzel2, L Hirtler3, S Zandieh4, R Windhager1, R Schuh1.   

Abstract

Aims: The traditional transosseus flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon transfer for patients with Achilles tendinopathy requires two incisions to harvest a long tendon graft. The use of a bio-tenodesis screw enables a short graft to be used and is less invasive, but lacks supporting evidence about its biomechanical behaviour. We aimed, in this study, to compare the strength of the traditional transosseus tendon-to-tendon fixation with tendon-to-bone fixation using a tenodesis screw, in cyclical loading and ultimate load testing. Materials and
Methods: Tendon grafts were undertaken in 24 paired lower-leg specimens and randomly assigned in two groups using fixation with a transosseus suture (suture group) or a tenodesis screw (screw group). The biomechanical behaviour was evaluated using cyclical and ultimate loading tests. The Student's t-test was performed to assess statistically significant differences in bone mineral density (BMD), displacement, the slope of the load-displacement curves, and load to failure.
Results: The screw group showed less displacement (loosening) during cyclical loading, which was significant during 300, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, and 1000 cycles (p < 0.05: other cycles: 0.079 < p < 0.402). Compared with the suture group, the screw group had higher mean ultimate load values (133.6 N, sd 73.5 vs 110.1 N, sd 46.2; p = 0.416).
Conclusion: Fixation of the FHL tendon with a tenodesis screw enables a less invasive procedure to be undertaken and shows similar biomechanical behaviour and primary strength compared with fixation using a transosseus suture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1175-81.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achilles tendinopathy; Achilles tendon; Bio-tenodesis screw; Flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer; Interference screw; Tendon transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30168756     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2018-0100.R2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  6 in total

1.  Patient reported outcomes and satisfaction following single incision Flexor Hallucis Longus (FHL) augmentation for chronic Achilles tendon pathologies.

Authors:  Mohamed Yassin; Vatsal Gupta; Andre Martins; Devendra Mahadevan; Maneesh Bhatia
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-10-19

2.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields improve the healing process of Achilles tendinopathy: a pilot study in a rat model.

Authors:  Carlotta Perucca Orfei; Arianna Barbara Lovati; Gaia Lugano; Marco Viganò; Marta Bottagisio; Daniele D'Arrigo; Valerio Sansone; Stefania Setti; Laura de Girolamo
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 5.853

3.  Biomechanical Analysis of Single Interference Screw vs Interference Screw With Cortical Button for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer.

Authors:  Kaitlin C Neary; Sarah J McClish; Anthony N Khoury; Nicholas Denove; John Konicek; Coen A Wijdicks
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2021-10-18

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of the proximal chevron osteotomy in comparison to the Lapidus arthrodesis for the correction of hallux valgus deformities.

Authors:  Maximilian F Kasparek; Emir Benca; Lena Hirtler; Madeleine Willegger; Friedrich Boettner; Shahin Zandieh; Johannes Holinka; Reinhard Windhager; Reinhard Schuh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.479

5.  Peroneus brevis as source of instability in Jones fracture fixation.

Authors:  Madeleine Willegger; Emir Benca; Lena Hirtler; Lukas Moser; Shahin Zandieh; Reinhard Windhager; Reinhard Schuh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of different ankle orthoses in a simulated lateral ankle sprain in two different modes.

Authors:  Emir Benca; Pejman Ziai; Lena Hirtler; Reinhard Schuh; Shahin Zandieh; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.221

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.