Li-Yaung Kuo1,2, Xinping Qi3, Hong Ma3,4, Fay-Wei Li1,2. 1. Boyce Thompson Institute, Ithaca, NY, USA. 2. Plant Biology Section, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. 3. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Biodiversity, Sciences and Ecological Engineering and Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, Institute of Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 4. Department of Biology and the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Abstract
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Filmy ferns (Hymenophyllales) are a highly specialized lineage, having mesophyll one-cell layer thick and inhabiting particularly shaded and humid environments. The phylogenetic placement of Hymenophyllales has been inconclusive, and while over 87 whole fern plastomes have been published, none was from Hymenophyllales. To better understand the evolutionary history of filmy ferns, we sequenced the first complete plastome for this order. METHODS: We compiled a phylogenomic plastome data set encompassing all 11 fern orders, and reconstructed phylogenies using different data types (nucleotides, codons, and amino acids) and partition schemes (codon positions and loci). To infer the evolution of fern plastome organization, we coded plastome features, including inversions, inverted repeat boundary shifts, gene losses, and tRNA anticodon sequences as characters, and reconstructed the ancestral states for these characters. KEY RESULTS: We discovered a suite of novel, Hymenophyllales-specific plastome structures that likely resulted from repeated expansions and contractions of the inverted repeat regions. Our phylogenetic analyses reveal that Hymenophyllales is highly supported as either sister to Gleicheniales or to Gleicheniales + the remaining non-Osmundales leptosporangiates, depending on the data type and partition scheme. CONCLUSIONS: Although our analyses could not confidently resolve the phylogenetic position of Hymenophyalles, the results here highlight the danger of drawing conclusions from "all-in" phylogenomic data set without exploring potential inconsistencies in the data. Finally, our first order-level reconstruction of fern plastome structural evolution provides a useful framework for future plastome research.
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Filmy ferns (Hymenophyllales) are a highly specialized lineage, having mesophyll one-cell layer thick and inhabiting particularly shaded and humid environments. The phylogenetic placement of Hymenophyllales has been inconclusive, and while over 87 whole fern plastomes have been published, none was from Hymenophyllales. To better understand the evolutionary history of filmy ferns, we sequenced the first complete plastome for this order. METHODS: We compiled a phylogenomic plastome data set encompassing all 11 fern orders, and reconstructed phylogenies using different data types (nucleotides, codons, and amino acids) and partition schemes (codon positions and loci). To infer the evolution of fern plastome organization, we coded plastome features, including inversions, inverted repeat boundary shifts, gene losses, and tRNA anticodon sequences as characters, and reconstructed the ancestral states for these characters. KEY RESULTS: We discovered a suite of novel, Hymenophyllales-specific plastome structures that likely resulted from repeated expansions and contractions of the inverted repeat regions. Our phylogenetic analyses reveal that Hymenophyllales is highly supported as either sister to Gleicheniales or to Gleicheniales + the remaining non-Osmundales leptosporangiates, depending on the data type and partition scheme. CONCLUSIONS: Although our analyses could not confidently resolve the phylogenetic position of Hymenophyalles, the results here highlight the danger of drawing conclusions from "all-in" phylogenomic data set without exploring potential inconsistencies in the data. Finally, our first order-level reconstruction of fern plastome structural evolution provides a useful framework for future plastome research.
Authors: Michael R May; Dori L Contreras; Michael A Sundue; Nathalie S Nagalingum; Cindy V Looy; Carl J Rothfels Journal: Syst Biol Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 15.683
Authors: Tanner A Robison; Amanda L Grusz; Paul G Wolf; Jeffrey P Mower; Blake D Fauskee; Karla Sosa; Eric Schuettpelz Journal: Genome Biol Evol Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 3.416