Literature DB >> 30168209

Evaluation of patient and staff exposure with state of the art X-ray technology in cardiac catheterization: A randomized controlled trial.

Dimitri Buytaert1, Liesbeth Eloot1, Maria Mauti2, Benny Drieghe3, Peter Gheeraert3, Yves Taeymans3, Klaus Bacher1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac catheterization procedures result in high patient radiation exposure and corresponding staff doses are reported to be among the highest for medical staff. The purpose of current randomized controlled study was to quantify the potential radiation dose reduction for both patient and staff, enabled by recent X-ray technology. This technology is equipped with advanced image processing algorithms, real-time dose monitoring, and an acquisition chain optimized for cardiac catheterization applications.
METHODS: A total of 122 adult patients were randomly assigned to one of two cath labs, either the reference X-ray modality (Allura Xper FD10, Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands) or the new X-ray system (AlluraClarity FD20/10 Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands). Exposure parameters and staff dosimeter readings were recorded for each exposure. Technical measurements were performed to define the radiation scatter behavior.
RESULTS: With the newer equipment, patient radiation dose is reduced (as total dose-area product) by 67% based on geometric means with 95%CI of 53%, 77% for diagnostic and interventional procedures. The C-arm and leg dosimeter readings were both reduced with 65% (P < 0.001), while for the collar and chest dosimeter readings no statistically significant reduction was noticed.
CONCLUSION: The new x-ray and image processing technology, significantly reduces patient dose in coronary angiographies, and PCIs by 67%. In general, scatter dose was also reduced, yet for some dosimeters the reduction was limited and not statistically significant. This study clearly indicates that the scatter behavior is highly dependent on C-arm rotation, operator movement and height, dosimeter position, beam filtration, clinical procedure type and system geometry.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary angiography; occupational radiation dose; patient radiation dose; radiation protection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30168209     DOI: 10.1111/joic.12553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  4 in total

1.  Occupational radiation exposure in doctors: an analysis of exposure rates over 25 years.

Authors:  Amy R Sharkey; Parthivi Gambhir; Sepas Saraskani; Ross Walker; Ashcaan Hajilou; Paul Bassett; Navneet Sandhu; Peter Croasdale; Ian Honey; Athanasios Diamantopoulos; Vicky Goh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  High filtration in interventional practices reduces patient radiation doses but not always scatter radiation doses.

Authors:  Roberto M Sanchez; Eliseo Vano; Pablo Salinas; Nieves Gonzalo; Javier Escaned; Jose M Fernández
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Combining Optimized Image Processing With Dual Axis Rotational Angiography: Toward Low-Dose Invasive Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Dimitri Buytaert; Benny Drieghe; Frédéric Van Heuverswyn; Jan De Pooter; Peter Gheeraert; Daniël De Wolf; Yves Taeymans; Klaus Bacher
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Patient radiation dose during angiography and embolization for abdominal hemorrhage: the influence of CT angiography, fluoroscopy system, patient and procedural variables.

Authors:  Conor McCaughey; Gerard M Healy; Hanin Al Balushi; Patrice Maher; Jackie McCavana; Julie Lucey; Colin P Cantwell
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2022-02-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.