Lucia Prihodova1,2, Suzanne Guerin1,2,3, Conall Tunney3, W George Kernohan2,4. 1. UCD School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 2. Palliative Care Research Network, All Ireland Institute for Hospice and Palliative Care, Dublin, Ireland. 3. UCD Centre for Disability Studies, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 4. Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Abstract
AIMS: To identify the key common components of knowledge transfer and exchange in existing models to facilitate practice developments in health services research. BACKGROUND: There are over 60 models of knowledge transfer and exchange designed for various areas of health care. Many of them remain untested and lack guidelines for scaling-up of successful implementation of research findings and of proven models ensuring that patients have access to optimal health care, guided by current research. DESIGN: A scoping review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines. Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange were identified using thematic analysis and frequency counts. DATA SOURCES: Six electronic databases were searched for papers published before January 2015 containing four key terms/variants: knowledge, transfer, framework, health care. REVIEW METHODS: Double screening, extraction and coding of the data using thematic analysis were employed to ensure rigour. As further validation stakeholders' consultation of the findings was performed to ensure accessibility. RESULTS: Of the 4,288 abstracts, 294 full-text articles were screened, with 79 articles analysed. Six key components emerged: knowledge transfer and exchange message, Stakeholders and Process components often appeared together, while from two contextual components Inner Context and the wider Social, Cultural and Economic Context, with the wider context less frequently considered. Finally, there was little consideration of the Evaluation of knowledge transfer and exchange activities. In addition, specific operational elements of each component were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The six components offer the basis for knowledge transfer and exchange activities, enabling researchers to more effectively share their work. Further research exploring the potential contribution of the interactions of the components is recommended.
AIMS: To identify the key common components of knowledge transfer and exchange in existing models to facilitate practice developments in health services research. BACKGROUND: There are over 60 models of knowledge transfer and exchange designed for various areas of health care. Many of them remain untested and lack guidelines for scaling-up of successful implementation of research findings and of proven models ensuring that patients have access to optimal health care, guided by current research. DESIGN: A scoping review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines. Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange were identified using thematic analysis and frequency counts. DATA SOURCES: Six electronic databases were searched for papers published before January 2015 containing four key terms/variants: knowledge, transfer, framework, health care. REVIEW METHODS: Double screening, extraction and coding of the data using thematic analysis were employed to ensure rigour. As further validation stakeholders' consultation of the findings was performed to ensure accessibility. RESULTS: Of the 4,288 abstracts, 294 full-text articles were screened, with 79 articles analysed. Six key components emerged: knowledge transfer and exchange message, Stakeholders and Process components often appeared together, while from two contextual components Inner Context and the wider Social, Cultural and Economic Context, with the wider context less frequently considered. Finally, there was little consideration of the Evaluation of knowledge transfer and exchange activities. In addition, specific operational elements of each component were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The six components offer the basis for knowledge transfer and exchange activities, enabling researchers to more effectively share their work. Further research exploring the potential contribution of the interactions of the components is recommended.
Authors: Silvia Gros Navés; Olga Canet-Vélez; Williams Contreras-Higuera; Judith Garcia-Expósito; Jordi Torralbas-Ortega; Judith Roca Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 4.614