Literature DB >> 30167724

Resident simulation training improves operative time of the retropubic midurethral sling procedure for stress incontinence.

Leigh Rosen1, Nina Jacobson1, Alan Weinberg1, Charles Ascher-Walsh2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to assess whether immediate preoperative resident simulation training decreases operative time and improves resident proficiency when performing a retropubic midurethral sling (MUS) procedure.
METHODS: This prospective cohort study took place over 8 months at the Icahn School of Medicine, New York, USA. During the first 4 months, all retropubic MUS procedures were performed by residents who underwent immediate preoperative simulation training. The cases completed during the following 4 months were performed by residents who had not received preoperative simulation training. During the 8-month period, residents completed self-assessment questionnaires upon completion of the surgery and attendings evaluated the residents using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) global rating scale. Operative time between the two periods were compared using two-sample Student's t test. Comparative analysis between groups was performed based on the OSATS scores using the Wilcoxon rank-sum nonparametric test.
RESULTS: There were 22 cases in the simulation group (SG) and 20 in the no simulation group (NSG). SG mean operative time was 12.6 min and NSG mean operative time was 14.6 min (p = 0.12). The SG mean OSATS score was 30.4 versus NSG of 27.8 (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that preoperative simulation significantly improves operative performance of the retropubic MUS procedure among residents and also improves their confidence in the operating room. There was a decrease in mean operative time of 2 min in the SG, but the difference was not statistically significant. This data is consistent in demonstrating improved surgical performance and resident confidence with simulation training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Operative time; Residents; Retropubic sling procedure; Simulation training; Stress urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30167724     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3744-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  15 in total

1.  Surgical experiences and training of residents: perspective of experienced gynecologic oncologists.

Authors:  J I Sorosky; B Anderson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Does a surgical simulator improve resident operative performance of laparoscopic tubal ligation?

Authors:  Erika H Banks; Scott Chudnoff; Ira Karmin; Cuiling Wang; Setul Pardanani
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Efficacy of a novel educational curriculum using a simulation laboratory on resident performance of hysteroscopic sterilization.

Authors:  Scott G Chudnoff; Connie S Liu; Mark D Levie; Peter Bernstein; Erika H Banks
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Effect of validated skills simulation on operating room performance in obstetrics and gynecology residents: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajiv Gala; Francisco Orejuela; Kim Gerten; Ernest Lockrow; Charles Kilpatrick; Lubna Chohan; Charles Green; Jessica Vaught; Aaron Goldberg; Joseph Schaffer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Megan O Schimpf; David D Rahn; Thomas L Wheeler; Minita Patel; Amanda B White; Francisco J Orejuela; Sherif A El-Nashar; Rebecca U Margulies; Jonathan L Gleason; Sarit O Aschkenazi; Mamta M Mamik; Renée M Ward; Ethan M Balk; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The "learning curve" for retropubic mid-urethral sling procedures: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul Hilton; Karen Rose
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Effects of a laboratory-based skills curriculum on laparoscopic proficiency: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Robert L Coleman; Carolyn Y Muller
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Traditional Versus Simulation Resident Surgical Laparoscopic Salpingectomy Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Nima R Patel; Gretchen E Makai; Nancy L Sloan; Carl R Della Badia
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 9.  Surgical simulation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leanne M Sutherland; Philippa F Middleton; Adrian Anthony; Jeffrey Hamdorf; Patrick Cregan; David Scott; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Simulation technology for skills training and competency assessment in medical education.

Authors:  Ross J Scalese; Vivian T Obeso; S Barry Issenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Use of surgical simulators in further education-A nationwide analysis in Germany].

Authors:  Stefanie Brunner; Juliane Kröplin; Hans-Joachim Meyer; Thomas Schmitz-Rixen; Tobias Fritz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 0.955

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.