Literature DB >> 30167514

Follistatin-Like 1: Growing Evidence for Its Beneficial Role in Heart Failure.

Kai C Wollert1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac hypertrophy; follistatin-like 1; heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Year:  2016        PMID: 30167514      PMCID: PMC6113344          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci        ISSN: 2452-302X


× No keyword cloud information.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with debilitating symptoms, recurrent hospitalizations, and a poor prognosis similar to that in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Major clinical trials have failed to identify specific drug therapies for HFpEF. These disappointing results have been attributed in part to an incomplete understanding of HFpEF pathophysiology (1). Follistatin-like 1 (FSTL1) is a secreted glycoprotein that was originally cloned as a transforming growth factor β-inducible gene (2). FSTL1 shares a structural motif, the follistatin domain, with follistatin, follistatin-like 3, and members of the secreted protein acidic and cysteine rich (SPARC) protein family. Overall, FSTL1 displays a low degree of amino acid sequence similarity with these other proteins, suggesting that it has evolved distinct functions. FSTL1 is weakly expressed in the normal myocardium but strongly induced in mice with HFrEF after transverse aortic constriction (3). Hypertrophied cardiac myocytes have emerged as the main producers of FSTL1 in this setting. Notably, genetic deletion of FSTL1 in cardiomyocytes exacerbated cardiac (myocyte) hypertrophy and systolic dysfunction in the HFrEF model (3). Outside the heart, FSTL1 has been shown to promote inflammation and fibrosis 4, 5. Comorbidities such as arterial hypertension and diabetes have been proposed to drive microvascular inflammation, fibrosis, and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in HFpEF (6), disease pathways that may all be influenced by FSTL1 3, 4, 5. In this issue of JACC: Basic to Translational Science, Tanaka et al. (7), therefore, postulated that FSTL1 plays a role in HFpEF. In their study, mice were subjected to unilateral nephrectomy followed by intraperitoneal infusion of aldosterone and addition of NaCl to the drinking water for 4 weeks. The animals developed arterial hypertension with concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and diastolic dysfunction on Doppler echocardiography. Left ventricular ejection fraction was preserved, and wet lung weight was (slightly) increased, indicating that the animals had developed HFpEF with pulmonary congestion. Considering the challenges of using Doppler echocardiography to assess diastolic function in mice (8), pressure-volume loop analyses would have strengthened the data. Genetic deletion of FSTL1 in cardiomyocytes did not affect arterial blood pressure, but worsened cardiac (myocyte) hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, and pulmonary congestion (7). These data support the idea that FSTL1 provides an autocrine feedback loop to protect from maladaptive cardiac hypertrophy in HFrEF and now also HFpEF 3, 7. Notably, mice lacking FSTL1 in cardiomyocytes developed enhanced cardiac fibrosis in the HFrEF model, but not the HFpEF model, indicating that FSTL1 may also exert antifibrotic effects under specific experimental conditions 3, 7. Inflammatory cells and endothelial cells participate in the regulation of cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and remodeling during pressure-overload (9), but the impact of FSTL1 on these non-myocyte cell types in HFrEF or HFpEF currently remains unknown. To start exploring the clinical ramifications of their study, Tanaka et al. (7) measured serum FSTL1 concentrations in 32 patients with HFpEF using a commercially available immunoassay. Patients had higher circulating FSTL1 levels (mean 167 ng/ml) than 8 apparently healthy individuals (96 ng/ml) (7). At first sight, this observation confirms a previous report from the same group documenting elevated FSTL1 levels in patients with HFrEF (10). However, the concentrations measured in the present study are surprisingly high (7). In a previous study, FSTL1 concentrations in 120 apparently healthy individuals ranged from 1 to 18 ng/ml (11). Other investigators have measured similar FSTL1 concentrations in apparently healthy individuals 12, 13. The very high FSTL1 concentrations reported in the present study (7), and by others (14), remain unexplained. In the HFrEF patients, serum FSTL1 was measured by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, and protein standards were used to ascertain the appropriate size of the FSTL1 band (10); concentrations in the HFrEF study were reported as arbitrary units, thus precluding a direct comparison with the HFpEF data (10). The specificity of an immunoassay also needs to be established, especially in a complex matrix such as serum or plasma. For example, size-exclusion chromatography can be used to confirm that an immunoassay detects a single analyte with the correct size (∼50,000 kDa in the case of human FSTL1) (11). Such an analysis was not performed in the current report (7), and this critical information is also not provided by the vendor of the immunoassay. In any case, the beneficial effects of endogenous FSTL1 in HFrEF and HFpEF models, suggest that augmentation of FSTL1 signaling could be a therapeutic approach in heart failure. In fact, transgenic overexpression of FSTL1 mitigated left ventricular hypertrophy, fibrosis, and systolic dysfunction in the murine HFrEF model (3). Likewise, adenoviral transfer of FSTL1 attenuated cardiac hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction in the HFpEF model (7). Translation of these findings into clinical practice may be challenging if long-term FSTL1 gene overexpression or protein delivery is required in patients with heart failure. Potential extracardiac side effects also need to be considered 4, 5. Acute conditions may represent more feasible indications for FSTL1 therapies. Indeed, capitalizing on the antiapoptotic effects of FSTL1 in cardiac myocytes (15), a brief intracoronary infusion of FSTL1 has been shown to reduce infarct size in pigs with acute myocardial infarction (16). A recent study indicated that application of FSTL1 via an epicardial patch enhances cardiomyocyte proliferation and systolic function after acute myocardial infarction (17), further heightening interest in FSTL1 as a therapeutic agent (18). Ultimately, new therapies may emerge from a better understanding of the mechanisms whereby FSTL1 exerts its multifaceted effects in acute and chronic heart diseases.
  18 in total

1.  Follistatin-like protein 1 is a mesenchyme-derived inflammatory protein and may represent a biomarker for systemic-onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  David C Wilson; Anthony D Marinov; Harry C Blair; Daniel S Bushnell; Susan D Thompson; Yury Chaly; Raphael Hirsch
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2010-08

2.  Cardiac myocyte follistatin-like 1 functions to attenuate hypertrophy following pressure overload.

Authors:  Masayuki Shimano; Noriyuki Ouchi; Kazuto Nakamura; Bram van Wijk; Koji Ohashi; Yasuhide Asaumi; Akiko Higuchi; David R Pimentel; Flora Sam; Toyoaki Murohara; Maurice J B van den Hoff; Kenneth Walsh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Follistatin-like 1 in chronic systolic heart failure: a marker of left ventricular remodeling.

Authors:  Ali El-Armouche; Noriyuki Ouchi; Komei Tanaka; Gheorghe Doros; Katrin Wittköpper; Thomas Schulze; Thomas Eschenhagen; Kenneth Walsh; Flora Sam
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 4.  Cardiac nonmyocytes in the hub of cardiac hypertrophy.

Authors:  Takehiro Kamo; Hiroshi Akazawa; Issei Komuro
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Follistatin-like protein 1 and the ferritin/erythrocyte sedimentation rate ratio are potential biomarkers for dysregulated gene expression and macrophage activation syndrome in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Mark Gorelik; Ndate Fall; Mekibib Altaye; Michael G Barnes; Susan D Thompson; Alexei A Grom; Raphael Hirsch
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Circulating concentrations of follistatin-like 1 in healthy individuals and patients with acute coronary syndrome as assessed by an immunoluminometric sandwich assay.

Authors:  Christian Widera; Rüdiger Horn-Wichmann; Tibor Kempf; Kerstin Bethmann; Beate Fiedler; Sarita Sharma; Ralf Lichtinghagen; Holger Leitolf; Boris Ivandic; Hugo A Katus; Evangelos Giannitsis; Kai C Wollert
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Follistatin-like 1 is an Akt-regulated cardioprotective factor that is secreted by the heart.

Authors:  Yuichi Oshima; Noriyuki Ouchi; Kaori Sato; Yasuhiro Izumiya; David R Pimentel; Kenneth Walsh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Epicardial FSTL1 reconstitution regenerates the adult mammalian heart.

Authors:  Ke Wei; Vahid Serpooshan; Cecilia Hurtado; Marta Diez-Cuñado; Mingming Zhao; Sonomi Maruyama; Wenhong Zhu; Giovanni Fajardo; Michela Noseda; Kazuto Nakamura; Xueying Tian; Qiaozhen Liu; Andrew Wang; Yuka Matsuura; Paul Bushway; Wenqing Cai; Alex Savchenko; Morteza Mahmoudi; Michael D Schneider; Maurice J B van den Hoff; Manish J Butte; Phillip C Yang; Kenneth Walsh; Bin Zhou; Daniel Bernstein; Mark Mercola; Pilar Ruiz-Lozano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Follistatin-like protein 1 is elevated in systemic autoimmune diseases and correlated with disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Dawei Li; Yuji Wang; Nanwei Xu; Qianghua Wei; Min Wu; Xiaofeng Li; Ping Zheng; Sai Sun; Yuli Jin; Gailian Zhang; Ruomin Liao; Ping Zhang
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Follistatin like 1 Regulates Hypertrophy in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Komei Tanaka; María Valero-Muñoz; Richard M Wilson; Eric E Essick; Conor T Fowler; Kazuto Nakamura; Maurice van den Hoff; Noriyuki Ouchi; Flora Sam
Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci       Date:  2016-06-27
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Adipokines, Myokines, and Cardiokines: The Role of Nutritional Interventions.

Authors:  Pamela Senesi; Livio Luzi; Ileana Terruzzi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.