| Literature DB >> 30167484 |
Divya Shet1,2, Jyotirmoy Ghosh1, Sreeja Ajith1,3, Vaibhav B Awachat1, Arumbackam V Elangovan1.
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of different levels of dietary phytase supplementation in the layer feed on egg production performance, egg shell quality and expression of osteopontin (OPN) and calbindin (CALB1) genes. Seventy-five White Leghorn layers at 23 weeks of age were randomly divided into 5 groups consisting of a control diet with 0.33% non-phytate phosphorus (NPP) and 4 low phosphorus (P) diets: 2 diets (T1 and T2) with 0.24% NPP + 250 FTU/kg laboratory produced phytase or commercial phytase and another 2 diets (T3 and T4) with 0.16% NPP + 500 FTU/kg laboratory produced phytase or commercial phytase with complete replacement of inorganic P. The results indicated that there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in egg production performance and quality of egg during the first 2 months of trial. However, in next 2 months, a significant drop in egg production and feed intake was observed in birds fed diets with low P and 500 FTU/kg supplementation of laboratory produced phytase. Osteopontin gene was up-regulated whereas the CALB1 gene was down regulated in all phytase treatment groups irrespective of the source of phytase. The current data demonstrated that 250 FTU/kg supplementation of laboratory produced phytase with 50% less NPP supplementation and 500 FTU/kg supplementation of commercial phytase even without NPP in diet can maintain the egg production. The up-regulation of OPN and down regulation of CALB1 in egg shell gland in the entire phytase treated group birds irrespective of the source of enzymes is indicative of the changes in P bio-availability at this site.Entities:
Keywords: Egg production; Egg shell; Gene expression; Layer; Phytase
Year: 2017 PMID: 30167484 PMCID: PMC6112343 DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2017.10.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Nutr ISSN: 2405-6383
Ingredient and nutrient composition of the experimental layer diet (DM basis).1
| Item | Control | T1 and T2 | T3 and T4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredient, % | |||
| Maize | 57.75 | 57.75 | 57.95 |
| Soybean meal | 23 | 23 | 23 |
| De oiled rice bran | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Limestone | 7.61 | 8.11 | 8.41 |
| Salt (NaCl) | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| CaHPO4 | 1.0 | 0.5 | – |
| DL-methionine | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| Trace mineral and vitamin premix | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Nutrient composition, % | |||
| ME, | 2,614 | 2,614 | 2,620 |
| CP | 17.1 | 17.1 | 17.1 |
| Ca | 3.53 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Total P | 0.632 | 0.552 | 0.472 |
| Phytate P | 0.308 | 0.308 | 0.308 |
| Available P | 0.32 | 0.24 | 0.16 |
| Lysine | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
| Methionine | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| Threonine | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
Control = 0.33% non-phytate phosphorus (NPP); T1 = 0.24% NPP + 250 FTU/kg laboratory produced phytase; T2 = 0.24% NPP + 250 FTU/kg commercial phytase; T3 = 0.16% NPP + 500 FTU/kg laboratory produced phytase; T4 = 0.16% NPP + 500 FTU/kg commercial phytase.
Trace mineral premix, 1 g/kg; vitamin premix, 1 g/kg and choline, 0.5 g/kg. Trace mineral premix supplied mg/kg diet: Mg, 300; Mn, 55; I, 0.4; Fe, 56; Zn, 30; Cu, 4. Vitamin premix supplied per kg diet: vitamin A, 8250 IU; vitamin D3, 30 mg; vitamin K, 1 mg; vitamin E, 40 IU; vitamin B1, 2 mg; vitamin B2, 4 mg; vitamin B12, 0.01 mg; niacin, 60 mg; pantothenic acid, 10 mg.
Calculated values.
qPCR primers of endogenous control (β-actin) and test genes osteopontin and calbindin used for relative quantification of gene expression with their melt temperature (Tm), GC content and amplicon sizes.
| Genes | Accession No. | Primer sequence (5′ to 3′) | Tm, °C | GC, % | Size, bp | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-actin | Left | AGAGCTATGAACTCCCTGATGG | 54.8 | 50 | 106 | |
| Right | CCACAGGACTCCATACCCAAG | 56.3 | 57.1 | |||
| Osteopontin | Left | AAGAGGCCGTGGATGATGATG | 54.36 | 52.38 | 254 | |
| Right | ATCCTCAATGAGCTTCCTGGC | 54.36 | 52.38 | |||
| Calbindin | Left | CTCCGACGGCAATGGGTAC | 55.4 | 63.2 | 96 | |
| Right | GGTGTTAAGTCCAAGCCTGCC | 56.3 | 57.1 |
Egg production performance of commercial layers into 2 phases from 23 to 31 wk and 32 to 40 wk.
| Groups | Egg production, % | Feed intake, g/bird | FCR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 to 31 wk | 32 to 40 wk | 23 to 31 wk | 32 to 40 wk | 23 to 31 wk | 32 to 40 wk | |
| Control | 93.4 | 96.6a | 100.8 | 106.6a | 2.04 | 1.95a |
| T1 | 90.1 | 96.4a | 99.9 | 106.7a | 2.01 | 1.91a |
| T2 | 93.5 | 96.5a | 102.2 | 108.4a | 2.09 | 1.97a |
| T3 | 90.3 | 73.6b | 102.1 | 96.7b | 1.98 | 1.83b |
| T4 | 95.5 | 98.3a | 105.7 | 108.1a | 2.06 | 1.97a |
| SEM | 0.94 | 1.598 | 0.87 | 0.899 | 0.016 | 0.017 |
| 0.318 | 0.001 | 0.296 | 0.001 | 0.191 | 0.045 | |
FCR = feed conversion ratio; SEM = standard error of mean.
a,b Different letters indicate significant difference within columns (P < 0.05).
Control = 0.33% non phytate phosphorus (NPP); T1 = 0.24% NPP + 250 FTU/kg laboratory produced phytase; T2 = 0.24% NPP + 250 FTU/kg commercial phytase; T3 = 0.16% NPP + 500 FTU/kg laboratory produced phytase; T4 = 0.16% NPP + 500 FTU/kg commercial phytase.
Egg quality of commercial layers into 2 phases from 23 to 31 wk and 32 to 40 wk.
| Groups | Egg weight, g | Shell weight, mm | Shell thickness, mm | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 to 31 wk | 32 to 40 wk | 23 to 31 wk | 32 to 40 wk | 23 to 31 wk | 32 to 40 wk | |
| Control | 51.5 | 54.7 | 10.3 | 10.25 | 0.382 | 0.363 |
| T1 | 51.9 | 56.2 | 9.7 | 10.25 | 0.37 | 0.368 |
| T2 | 50.5 | 55.1 | 10.5 | 10.15 | 0.388 | 0.362 |
| T3 | 49.9 | 53.07 | 10.4 | 9.15 | 0.393 | 0.328 |
| T4 | 52 | 55.05 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 0.393 | 0.365 |
| SEM | 0.32 | 0.374 | 0.13 | 0.177 | 0.0048 | 0.006 |
| 0.138 | 0.126 | 0.284 | 0.077 | 0.534 | 0.118 | |
SEM = standard error of mean.
Control = 0.33% non phytate phosphorus (NPP); T1 = 0.24% NPP + 250 FTU/kg laboratory produced phytase; T2 = 0.24% NPP + 250 FTU/kg commercial phytase; T3 = 0.16% NPP + 500 FTU/kg laboratory produced phytase; T4 = 0.16% NPP + 500 FTU/kg commercial phytase.
Fig. 1Effect of dietary non phytate phosphorus (NPP) level and phytase supplementation on relative expression of (A) osteopontin (OPN) and (B) calbindin (CALB1) mRNA in eggshell glands. The bars (means ± SEM) with different letters (a, b, c) showed significant differences at P ≤ 0.05. Control = 0.33% NPP; T1 = 0.24%NPP + 250 FTU/kg laboratory produced phytase; T2 = 0.24%NPP + 250 FTU/kg commercial phytase; T3 = 0.16%NPP + 500 FTU/kg laboratory produced phytase; T4 = 0.16%NPP + 500 FTU/kg commercial phytase.