| Literature DB >> 30167158 |
Barbara Fazio1, Pietro Artoni2, Maria Antonia Iatì1, Cristiano D'Andrea3, Maria Josè Lo Faro1,2,3, Salvatore Del Sorbo4, Stefano Pirotta4, Pietro Giuseppe Gucciardi1, Paolo Musumeci2,3, Cirino Salvatore Vasi1, Rosalba Saija5, Matteo Galli4, Francesco Priolo2,3,6, Alessia Irrera1.
Abstract
We report on the unconventional optical properties exhibited by a two-dimensional array of thin Si nanowires arranged in a random fractal geometry and fabricated using an inexpensive, fast and maskless process compatible with Si technology. The structure allows for a high light-trapping efficiency across the entire visible range, attaining total reflectance values as low as 0.1% when the wavelength in the medium matches the length scale of maximum heterogeneity in the system. We show that the random fractal structure of our nanowire array is responsible for a strong in-plane multiple scattering, which is related to the material refractive index fluctuations and leads to a greatly enhanced Raman scattering and a bright photoluminescence. These strong emissions are correlated on all length scales according to the refractive index fluctuations. The relevance and the perspectives of the reported results are discussed as promising for Si-based photovoltaic and photonic applications.Entities:
Keywords: Raman enhancement; light trapping; multiple scattering; random fractal; silicon nanowires
Year: 2016 PMID: 30167158 PMCID: PMC6059951 DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2016.62
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Light Sci Appl ISSN: 2047-7538 Impact factor: 17.782
Figure 1SEM images of Si NWs obtained by the metal-assisted wet etching technique. (a) Cross-section SEM image of Si NWs obtained by the metal-assisted wet etching technique. (b, c and d) Plan view SEM images of a Si NW sample obtained at three different magnifications (25 k ×, 250 k × and 2500 k ×). The structure is arranged in a Russian-nesting-doll-like distribution: in particular, panel c is the higher magnification of the sample area inside the yellow square in panel b, and panel d is the higher magnification of the sample area inside the red square in panel c. (e) Plan view SEM image of interconnected gold film deposited on a Si (111) surface. (f) Silicon surface coverage histogram for the plan view SEM images shown here.
Figure 2Characterization of 2D random fractal structures of Si NWs. Si NW samples 1 (a) and 2 (b) plan view SEM images used for Fraclac analysis. Details of the analysis with sectioning in square boxes in the reduced sample portion are shown in the inset of panel a. The fractal dimension and lacunarity plots obtained as analysis results are shown in (c and d), respectively. Note that the pixel size is 6.7 nm. Hence, length (nm)=ε (pixel) × 6.67 (nm per pixel).
Figure 3Light-scattering properties of Si NW random fractal array. (a) Diffuse (hemispherical) reflectance of Si NW sample 1 (black lines) and sample 2 (blue line) and of a bulk c-Si flat (front) and diffusive rough (back) surface (green and red lines, respectively). (b) Direct transmittance, by excluding the diffuse component, of samples 1 and 2 obtained in a polished back surface (black and blue dots, respectively) and of a bulk c-Si (red dots). (c) Coherent backscattering cone (black dots) of sample 1 obtained at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm; the red continuous line is the best-fitting curve obtained by the semi-infinite slab model. The inset shows a schematic sketch of the mechanism.
Figure 4Photoluminescence emission and Raman scattering from the Si NW fractal array. (a) Raman backscattered radiation and PL emission from the Si NW sample 1 at an incident laser wavelength of 488 nm (power 20 mW on a spot with a 100 μm diameter). (b) Raman enhancement of Si NW sample 1 with respect to the c-Si bare substrate. (c) PLE of sample 1 evaluated at 690 nm. (d) Raman enhancement of Si NW sample 2 with respect to the c-Si bare substrate. All the trends are plotted as a function of the incident laser wavelength and compared to the apparent absorbance of the corresponding sample (black lines). The arrows indicate the y-axis corresponding to the plotted data having the same color.
Figure 5Comparison between lacunarity and Raman enhancement. The Raman enhancement of sample 1 (green dots) and sample 2 (red dots) plotted as a function of the effective incident laser wavelength propagating in the medium λeff and compared with the corresponding lacunarity curves (black and blue lines represent samples 1 and 2, respectively).