Literature DB >> 30166329

Outcome-based interpretation of early interim PET in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.

Carsten Kobe1, Helen Goergen2, Christian Baues3, Georg Kuhnert1, Conrad-Amadeus Voltin1, Josée Zijlstra4, Otto Hoekstra5, Jasmin Mettler1, Alexander Drzezga1, Andreas Engert6, Peter Borchmann6, Markus Dietlein1.   

Abstract

The HD18 study for patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) used positron emission tomography (PET) after 2 cycles (PET-2) of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone in escalated doses (eBEACOPP) to guide further treatment. Here, we analyzed the impact of PET-2 results in the context of eBEACOPP according to the Deauville score (DS) in patients treated within the HD18 trial. Residual tissue was visually compared with reference regions according to DS. We analyzed the association between PET-2 uptake and baseline characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). One thousand five patients (52%) had DS1 or DS2, 471 (24%) had DS3, and 469 (24%) DS4. PET-2 uptake was associated with baseline risk factors large mediastinal mass, extranodal disease, and high International Prognostic Score (P < .0001 each). Among 722 patients receiving standard therapy with 6 cycles of eBEACOPP, 3-year PFS rates were 92.2%, 95.9%, and 87.6% with DS1-2, DS3, and DS4, respectively. Univariate hazard ratio (HR) for PFS in patients with DS4 vs DS1-3 was 2.3 (1.3-3.8; P = .002). DS4 was the only factor remaining significant for PFS in a multivariate analysis including the associated baseline risk factors. Three-year OS rates were 97.6% for DS1-2, 99.0% for DS3, and 96.8% for DS4, with a univariate HR for DS4 vs DS1-3 of 2.6 (1.0-6.6; P = .04). Residual uptake above that in the liver at PET-2 (ie, DS4) is an important risk factor regarding survival outcomes for patients treated with eBEACOPP upfront. We thus recommend DS4 as the cutoff value for PET-2 positivity. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00515554.
© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30166329     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-05-852129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  9 in total

1.  Deauville score: the Phoenix rising from ashes.

Authors:  Egesta Lopci; Michel Meignan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Joseph M Connors; Wendy Cozen; Christian Steidl; Antonino Carbone; Richard T Hoppe; Hans-Henning Flechtner; Nancy L Bartlett
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 52.329

3.  Time to Prepare for Risk Adaptation in Lymphoma by Standardizing Measurement of Metabolic Tumor Burden.

Authors:  Sally F Barrington; Michel Meignan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Interim PET-results for prognosis in adults with Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies.

Authors:  Angela Aldin; Lisa Umlauff; Lise J Estcourt; Gary Collins; Karel Gm Moons; Andreas Engert; Carsten Kobe; Bastian von Tresckow; Madhuri Haque; Farid Foroutan; Nina Kreuzberger; Marialena Trivella; Nicole Skoetz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-16

5.  Interim PET-results for prognosis in adults with Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies.

Authors:  Angela Aldin; Lisa Umlauff; Lise J Estcourt; Gary Collins; Karel Gm Moons; Andreas Engert; Carsten Kobe; Bastian von Tresckow; Madhuri Haque; Farid Foroutan; Nina Kreuzberger; Marialena Trivella; Nicole Skoetz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-13

6.  Five-year follow-up of SWOG S0816: limitations and values of a PET-adapted approach with stage III/IV Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Deborah M Stephens; Hongli Li; Heiko Schöder; David J Straus; Craig H Moskowitz; Michael LeBlanc; Lisa M Rimsza; Nancy L Bartlett; Andrew M Evens; Ann S LaCasce; Paul M Barr; Michael V Knopp; Eric D Hsi; John P Leonard; Brad S Kahl; Sonali M Smith; Jonathan W Friedberg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 25.476

Review 7.  FDG-PET Imaging for Hodgkin and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma-An Updated Overview.

Authors:  Conrad-Amadeus Voltin; Jasmin Mettler; Jirka Grosse; Markus Dietlein; Christian Baues; Christine Schmitz; Peter Borchmann; Carsten Kobe; Dirk Hellwig
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  PET-adapted approaches to primary therapy for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Noemie Lang; Michael Crump
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2020-06-02

9.  Does a 6-point scale approach to post-treatment 18F-FDG PET-CT allow to improve response assessment in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma? A multicenter study.

Authors:  P Bonomo; A Merlotti; S Morbelli; V Berti; C Saieva; F Bergesio; A Bacigalupo; L Belgioia; C Franzese; E Lopci; A Casolo; E D'Angelo; D Alterio; L Travaini; L Berretta; V Pirro; S Ursino; D Volterrani; M Roncali; F Vigo; S Cicchetti; F Scalone; G Belli; S Cauda; I Desideri; E Russi; L Livi; A Bianchi
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2020-05-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.