Literature DB >> 3016627

Performance of sliding knots in monofilament and multifilament suture material.

J B Trimbos, E J Van Rijssel, P J Klopper.   

Abstract

Three different sliding knots were tested using five recently developed monofilament and multifilament suture materials. The resorbable materials were polyglactin-910 (Vicryl), polyglycolic-acid (Dexon-Plus), polyglyconate (Maxon), and polydioxanone (PDS), and the nonresorbable material was polypropylene (Prolene). For each type of sliding knot, three or five throws of suture were tested. Knot strength was determined by the loop holding capacity, which was defined as the strength at which the knot broke, or at which slippage in the knot amounted to more than 2 mm. When the three kinds of sliding knots were compared, identical sliding knots with identical throws around a single suture were found to be the most unreliable. Nonidentical and parallel sliding knots differed little with respect to knot reliability. Five-throw knots were generally stronger than three-throw knots. However, the effect of adding two extra throws to three-throw sliding knots was only significant if monofilament suture material was used. Comparison of the different suture materials revealed major differences in knot holding ability. These findings indicate that knot strength is dependent on both the type of knot and the type of suture material, and surgeons should be cognizant of these variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3016627     DOI: 10.1097/00006250-198609000-00029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Running closure of clean and contaminated abdominal wounds using a synthetic monofilament absorbable looped suture.

Authors:  K Iwase; J Higaki; Y Tanaka; H Kondoh; M Yoshikawa; W Kamiike
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Optimal configuration of arthroscopic sliding knots backed up with multiple half-hitches.

Authors:  Chris H Jo; Ji-Ho Lee; Seung-Baik Kang; Jae Hyup Lee; Hyuk Soo Han; Tae Soo Bae; Kuiwon Choi; Changyang Lee; Myung Chul Lee; Kang-Sup Yoon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Variability of surgical knot tying techniques: do we need to standardize?

Authors:  Lars Fischer; Thomas Bruckner; Beat P Müller-Stich; Jörg Höer; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Approximating tissue under tension using the slipped square sliding knot.

Authors:  O Tillo; M Nawinne; D Oudit
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Effect of Suture Type and Suture Distance on Holding Strength in Nasal Septal Laceration Model.

Authors:  Alper Köycü; Evren Hızal; Ozan Erol; Adnan Fuat Büyüklü
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-26

6.  How to tie dangerous surgical knots: easily. Can we avoid this?

Authors:  Eric Drabble; Sofia Spanopoulou; Eleni Sioka; Ellie Politaki; Ismini Paraskeva; Effrosyni Palla; Lauren Stockley; Dimitris Zacharoulis
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2021-07-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.