| Literature DB >> 30166069 |
Katherine L Yates1, Phil J Bouchet2, M Julian Caley3, Kerrie Mengersen3, Christophe F Randin4, Stephen Parnell5, Alan H Fielding6, Andrew J Bamford7, Stephen Ban8, A Márcia Barbosa9, Carsten F Dormann10, Jane Elith11, Clare B Embling12, Gary N Ervin13, Rebecca Fisher14, Susan Gould15, Roland F Graf16, Edward J Gregr17, Patrick N Halpin18, Risto K Heikkinen19, Stefan Heinänen20, Alice R Jones21, Periyadan K Krishnakumar22, Valentina Lauria23, Hector Lozano-Montes24, Laura Mannocci25, Camille Mellin26, Mohsen B Mesgaran27, Elena Moreno-Amat28, Sophie Mormede29, Emilie Novaczek30, Steffen Oppel31, Guillermo Ortuño Crespo18, A Townsend Peterson32, Giovanni Rapacciuolo33, Jason J Roberts18, Rebecca E Ross12, Kylie L Scales34, David Schoeman35, Paul Snelgrove36, Göran Sundblad37, Wilfried Thuiller38, Leigh G Torres39, Heroen Verbruggen11, Lifei Wang40, Seth Wenger41, Mark J Whittingham42, Yuri Zharikov43, Damaris Zurell44, Ana M M Sequeira45.
Abstract
Predictive models are central to many scientific disciplines and vital for informing management in a rapidly changing world. However, limited understanding of the accuracy and precision of models transferred to novel conditions (their 'transferability') undermines confidence in their predictions. Here, 50 experts identified priority knowledge gaps which, if filled, will most improve model transfers. These are summarized into six technical and six fundamental challenges, which underlie the combined need to intensify research on the determinants of ecological predictability, including species traits and data quality, and develop best practices for transferring models. Of high importance is the identification of a widely applicable set of transferability metrics, with appropriate tools to quantify the sources and impacts of prediction uncertainty under novel conditions.Keywords: Predictive modeling; extrapolation; generality; habitat models; model transfers; species distribution models; uncertainty
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30166069 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Ecol Evol ISSN: 0169-5347 Impact factor: 17.712