| Literature DB >> 30165890 |
Biao Geng1,2, Jinshun Pan1, Ting Zhao1, Jie Ji3, Chen Zhang1, Ying Che4, Jing Yang1, Hui Shi5, Juan Li6, Hong Zhou7, Xianmin Mu1, Che Xu1, Chao Wang8, Yue Xu1, Zheng Liu4, Hao Wen8, Qiang You9,10,11,12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enzymatically inactive chitinase-like protein CHI3L1 drives inflammatory response and promotes tumor progression. However, its role in gastric cancer (GC) tumorigenesis and metastasis has not yet been fully elucidated. We determined the significance of CHI3L1 expression in patients with GC. We also explored an as-yet unknown receptor of CHI3L1 and investigated the involved signaling in GC metastasis.Entities:
Keywords: CD44; CHI3L1; Gastric Cancer; IL-13Rα2; β-Catenin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30165890 PMCID: PMC6117920 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-018-0876-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 0392-9078
Fig. 1Upregulation of CHI3L1 correlates with distant metastasis and poor prognosis of human GCs. a Western blot analysis of CHI3L1 protein expression in 5 pairs of gastric tissues (GC and adjacent non-cancerous tissues) after curative resection. Data represent mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05 (Student’s t test). b Immunohistochemical analysis of CHI3L1 protein levels in GC samples on tissue microarrays. Representative examples of CHI3L1 expression in adjacent non-cancerous gastric tissues, GC tissues and GC metastases tissues (lymph node and pancreas) are shown. Scale bars represent 100 μm. c-e Serum CHI3L1 levels in GC patients (n = 100) and normal controls (n = 50) (c); Serum CHI3L1 levels in GC patients with different tumor invasive depth (d) (n = 17 [T1 + T2], n = 83 [T3 + T4]) and lymph node metastasis (e) (n = 21 [N0 + N1], n = 79 [N1 + N2]). Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess p values; *p < 0.05. f-i The overall survival of patients with high or low CHI3L1 expression in GC tissues. Kaplan-Meier test was used to analyze p values
Associations between CHI3L1 Expression and Clinical Pathological Characteristics in Patients with GC
| Variable | n | Low (CHI3L1) | High(CHI3L1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.369 | |||
| < 60 | 32 | 12 | 20 | |
| ≥ 60 | 68 | 32 | 36 | |
| Gender | 0.724 | |||
| Male | 64 | 29 | 35 | |
| Female | 36 | 15 | 21 | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.508 | |||
| ≤ 4 | 26 | 10 | 16 | |
| > 4 | 74 | 34 | 40 | |
| Differentiation | 0.311 | |||
| Well | 42 | 16 | 26 | |
| Poor | 58 | 28 | 30 | |
| Depth of invasion (T) | 0.013 | |||
| T1+ T2 | 15 | 11 | 4 | |
| T3+ T4 | 85 | 33 | 52 | |
| Lymph node metastasis(N) | 0.024 | |||
| N0 + N1 | 42 | 24 | 18 | |
| N2+ N3 | 58 | 20 | 38 | |
| Distant metastasis (M) | 0.075 | |||
| Negative (M0) | 92 | 43 | 49 | |
| Positive (M1) | 8 | 1 | 7 | |
| TNM stage | 0.026 | |||
| I+ II | 40 | 23 | 17 | |
| III + IV | 60 | 21 | 39 |
Fig. 2CHI3L1 binds to CD44 which also interacts with IL-13Rα2. a Western blot analysis of CHI3L1, CD44 and IL-13Rα2 protein expression in various gastric cancer cell lines. b-c Lysates from AGS and MGC803 cells were immunoprecipitated (IP) with control IgG and anti-CD44 or anti-CHI3L1 antibody, and then immunoblotted as indicated. Five percent of total cell lysates were used for the input. d Co-localization of CD44 (green) and CHI3L1 (red) in AGS (upper panel), MGC803 (middle panel) and GC tissues from patient #1 (lower panel) by immunofluorescent confocal microscopy (Magnification: 630×). Scale bars represent 10 μm. e-f Lysates from AGS and MGC803 cells were immunoprecipitated (IP) with IgG and anti-CD44 or anti-IL-13Rα2 antibody, and then immunoblotted as indicated. Five percent of total cell lysates were used for the input. g Co-localization of CD44 (green) and IL-13Rα2 (red) in AGS (upper panel), MGC803 (middle panel) and GC tissues from patient #2 (lower panel) by immunofluorescent confocal microscopy (Magnification: 630×). Scale bars represent 10 μm
Fig. 3CHI3L1 triggers Erk and Akt signaling through CD44. a and b Western blot analysis of Erk and Akt activation in the AGS and MGC803 cells which were pre-exposed with the control antibody or functional CD44 blocking antibody and treated with rhCHI3L1 (500 ng/ml) for the indicated times. c and d Western blot analysis of CD44 and IL-13Rα2 knockdown efficacy in AGS (c) and MGC803 (d) transfected with scramble, CD44 or IL-13Rα2 shRNA. e and f Westen blot evaluation of the activation of Erk and Akt in AGS and MGC803 cells which stably expressing scrambled, CD44 or IL-13Rα2 shRNA and were cultured in the presence or absence of rhCHI3L1 (500 ng/ml). g Westen blot analysis of the activation of Erk and Akt in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) from WT and CD44−/− mice which were incubated with the recombinant mouse CHI3L1 (500 ng/ml) for the noted periods of time
Fig. 4CHI3L1 regulates β-Catenin signaling via CD44. a Western blot analyses were used to evaluate β-catenin phosphorylation (Ser675 or Ser552), and active-β-Catenin (ABC) after exposure to rhCHI3L1 (500 ng/ml) in the presence of control or CD44 neutralizing antibody (10 μg/ml) for the noted periods of time. b-d AGS cell were pretreated with control IgG or CD44 blocking antibody (10 μg/ml). Then, the immunofluorescence assays of p-β-catenin (Ser552 or Ser675) and active-β-catenin (ABC) (all in red) were performed in AGS cell treated with rhCHI3L1 (500 ng/ml). DAPI (blue) was used as a nuclear counterstain. The quantification of nuclear β-catenin positive staining in at least 200 counted cells was presented as percentage ± SEM. Magnification: 400×, Scale bars represent 20 μm. Results shown here are the representative of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was calculated using ANOVA (b-d). *p < 0.05
Fig. 5Roles of CHI3L1 in promoting GC growth and metastasis in vitro. a The effects of rhCHI3L1 on AGS and MGC803 cells proliferation were measured by CCK8 assay. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. b Colony formation assays were performed for AGS and SGC7901 cells. c and d Proliferation of AGS (c) and MGC803 (d) cells were evaluated by EdU incorporation assay. e The invasion assay of AGS and MGC803 cells. f AGS cells transfected with scramble control or shRNAs targeting CD44 were subjected to wound closure assays. g GC cells were incubated with rhCHI3L1for the noted periods of time. Protein levels of Vimentin and Snail were analyzed by Western blot. CHI3L1 (500 ng/ml) in combination with control or functional CD44 neutralizing antibody (10 μg/ml) were used in the experiments. Results shown here are the representative of three independent experiments. Scale bars represent 100 μm. Statistical significance was calculated using ANOVA (a-f). *p < 0.05
Fig. 6CD44v3 physically interacts with CHI3L1 and IL-13Rα2. a Illustration of CD44 gene and alternative spliced variants (e.g., CD44s, CD44v3, v6 and v9 isoforms) which contain external, transmembrane (TM) and intracellular domain. b The structure of CD44v3 transmembrane protein, which contains the hyaluronic acid (HA) binding sites at the external N-terminal region, a heparin sulfate (HS) assembly site in v3 domain, and the signaling regulator binding sites at the cytoplasmic region. CD44v3 domain amino acid sequences and v3 peptide used in the current study (in red) were listed. c-e Binding of CD44v3 extracellular domain (ECD) (c) or CD44v3 peptide (d and e) to rhCHI3L1 or rhIL-13Rα2 ECD. The binding affinity was evaluated by the absorbance at 450 nm in a direct ELISA. Results shown are representative of a minimum of three independent experiments. The values represent the mean ± SEM in triplicate; *p < 0.05. f and g Measurement of the binding affinity of CD44v3 peptide to rhCHI3L1 (f) or rhIL-13Rα2 ECD (g) by biolayer interferometry (BLI). Various concentrations of CD44v3 peptide were shown. All experiments were performed in triplicate. h Binding of CD44v6 peptide to rhCHI3L1 or rhIL-13Rα2 ECD evaluated by a direct ELISA as describe above. i-j Measurement of the binding affinity of CD44s ECD to rhCHI3L1 (i) or rhIL-13Rα2 ECD (j) by biolayer interferometry (BLI). CD44s ECD was immobilized and CHI3L1 (500 μM) or IL-13Rα2 (500 μM) was in the mobile phase
Fig. 7CHI3L1 mediated tumorigenesis through CD44 in vivo. a A representative image of tumor growth in nude mice subcutaneously inoculated with lenti-shCHI3L1- or lenti-shControl-transfected MGC803 cells. b The growth curve of subcutaneous tumor from MGC803 cells infected with lenti-shCHI3L1 or lenti-shControl in nude mice (n = 10 animals per group). c Comparison of tumor weight from two groups at the end of the experiment. d Evaluation of cell proliferative activity by Ki-67 staining in subcutaneous xenografts from MGC803 cells infected with lenti-shControl or lenti-shCHI3L1. e and f H&E staining of the representative SGC7901 cells lung metastatic lesions in nude mice (e). The total area of invasive lesions on the lung slice section represents the invasive tumor volume in the lungs (f). Sizing bar indicates 100 μm. g Representative photograph of lungs from WT and CD44−/− mice 2 weeks after challenge with B16-F10 melanoma cells. Comparison of the number of pleural melanoma colonies in lungs from tumor cells challenged WT and CD44−/− mice (n = 8 animals per group). h and i The levels of total (h) and active (i) TGF-β1 in broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) fluids from WT mice and CD44−/− mice. j Schematic representation of the CHI3L1/CD44-IL-13Rα2 signaling pathway in promoting GC cell metastasis. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05 (Student’s t test)