Literature DB >> 30165763

Ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty are associated with a reduced risk of revision for infection.

Rami Madanat1,2,3, Inari Laaksonen1,3, Stephen E Graves4, Michelle Lorimer5, Orhun Muratoglu1,2, Henrik Malchau1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and bearing material's associations to PJI prevalence is largely unknown. The main purposes of this study were to determine if revision for infection varied depending on the type of bearing surface used in primary THA and to study whether patient or implant related factors had an effect on this variation.
METHODS: A total of 177,237 primary THA procedures from the Australian Registry (AOANJRR) were analysed. 3 bearing surfaces were compared. Metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (MoXP) bearing had been used in 95,129 hips, ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (CoXP) in 24,269 hips, and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) in 57,839 hips. Revision rates for infection were compared between the 3 groups.
RESULTS: Both MoXP and CoXP had a higher revision rate for infection compared to CoC hips (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46 (1.25, 1.72), p < 0.001) and HR 1.42 (1.15, 1.75), p = 0.001 respectively). Patients aged 70 years or less had a lower revision rate for infection when a CoC bearing was used. This difference was independent of sex, and prostheses selection. No difference was evident if the femoral component was cemented or a head size of 28 mm was used. DISCUSSION: In this registry-based material, use of a CoC bearing was associated with a lower risk of revision for infection in patients younger than 70 years when cementless femoral components were used. Further studies are needed to verify this finding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bearing material; ceramic-on-ceramic; periprosthetic joint infection; registry study; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30165763     DOI: 10.1177/1120700018776464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Tribology in hip arthroplasty : Benefits of different materials].

Authors:  J Philippe Kretzer; Maximilian Uhler; Sebastian Jäger; Therese Bormann; Robert Sonntag; Mareike Schonhoff; Stefan Schröder
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Cementless ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in post-traumatic osteoarthritis after acetabular fracture: long-term results.

Authors:  Stefano Lucchini; Francesco Castagnini; Federico Giardina; Francesco Tentoni; Claudio Masetti; Enrico Tassinari; Barbara Bordini; Francesco Traina
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI): A Clinical Practice Protocol in High-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Ferdinando Iannotti; Paolo Prati; Andrea Fidanza; Raffaele Iorio; Andrea Ferretti; Daniel Pèrez Prieto; Nanne Kort; Bruno Violante; Gennaro Pipino; Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Michael Hirschmann; Marco Mugnaini; Pier Francesco Indelli
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-11

4.  Comparison of Ceramic-on-Ceramic vs. Ceramic-on-Polyethylene for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of 15 Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Xiaobin Shang; Yan Fang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-16

5.  Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing in Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduces the Risk for Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Compared to Ceramic-on-Polyethylene: A Matched Analysis of 118,753 Cementless THA Based on the German Arthroplasty Registry.

Authors:  Lisa Renner; Carsten Perka; Oliver Melsheimer; Alexander Grimberg; Volkmar Jansson; Arnd Steinbrück
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.