Dae Hyun Kim1,2,3, Robert J Glynn1,4, Jerry Avorn1, Lewis A Lipsitz2,3, Kenneth Rockwood5, Ajinkya Pawar1, Sebastian Schneeweiss1. 1. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A claims-based frailty index (CFI) was developed based on a deficit-accumulation approach using self-reported health information. This study aimed to independently validate the CFI against physical performance and adverse health outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 3,642 community-dwelling older adults who had at least 1 health care encounter in the year prior to assessments of physical performance in the 2008 Health and Retirement Study wave. A CFI was estimated from Medicare claims data in the past year. Gait speed, grip strength, and the 2-year risk of death, institutionalization, disability, hospitalization, and prolonged (>30 days) skilled nursing facility (SNF) stay were evaluated for CFI categories (robust: <0.15, prefrail: 0.15-0.24, mildly frail: 0.25-0.34, moderate-to-severely frail: ≥0.35). RESULTS: The prevalence of robust, prefrail, mildly frail, and moderate-to-severely frail state was 52.7%, 38.0%, 7.1%, and 2.2%, respectively. Individuals with higher CFI had lower mean gait speed (moderate-to-severely frail vs robust: 0.39 vs 0.78 m/s) and weaker grip strength (19.8 vs 28.5 kg). Higher CFI was associated with death (moderate-to-severely frail vs robust: 46% vs 7%), institutionalization (21% vs 5%), activity of daily living disability (33% vs 9%), instrumental activity of daily living disability (100% vs 22%), hospitalization (79% vs 23%), and prolonged SNF stay (17% vs 2%). The odds ratios per 1-SD (=0.07) difference in CFI were 1.46-2.06 for these outcomes, which remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, sex, and a comorbidity index. CONCLUSION: The CFI is useful to identify individuals with poor physical function and at greater risks of adverse health outcomes in Medicare data.
BACKGROUND: A claims-based frailty index (CFI) was developed based on a deficit-accumulation approach using self-reported health information. This study aimed to independently validate the CFI against physical performance and adverse health outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 3,642 community-dwelling older adults who had at least 1 health care encounter in the year prior to assessments of physical performance in the 2008 Health and Retirement Study wave. A CFI was estimated from Medicare claims data in the past year. Gait speed, grip strength, and the 2-year risk of death, institutionalization, disability, hospitalization, and prolonged (>30 days) skilled nursing facility (SNF) stay were evaluated for CFI categories (robust: <0.15, prefrail: 0.15-0.24, mildly frail: 0.25-0.34, moderate-to-severely frail: ≥0.35). RESULTS: The prevalence of robust, prefrail, mildly frail, and moderate-to-severely frail state was 52.7%, 38.0%, 7.1%, and 2.2%, respectively. Individuals with higher CFI had lower mean gait speed (moderate-to-severely frail vs robust: 0.39 vs 0.78 m/s) and weaker grip strength (19.8 vs 28.5 kg). Higher CFI was associated with death (moderate-to-severely frail vs robust: 46% vs 7%), institutionalization (21% vs 5%), activity of daily living disability (33% vs 9%), instrumental activity of daily living disability (100% vs 22%), hospitalization (79% vs 23%), and prolonged SNF stay (17% vs 2%). The odds ratios per 1-SD (=0.07) difference in CFI were 1.46-2.06 for these outcomes, which remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, sex, and a comorbidity index. CONCLUSION: The CFI is useful to identify individuals with poor physical function and at greater risks of adverse health outcomes in Medicare data.
Authors: Amit Kumar; Amol M Karmarkar; James E Graham; Linda Resnik; Alai Tan; Anne Deutsch; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Alexander M Kulminski; Svetlana V Ukraintseva; Irina V Kulminskaya; Konstantin G Arbeev; Kenneth Land; Anatoli I Yashin Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-03-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Daniel M Gilden; Joanna M Kubisiak; Kristin Kahle-Wrobleski; Daniel E Ball; Lee Bowman Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-07-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Olga Theou; Alexandra M van der Valk; Judith Godin; Melissa K Andrew; Janet E McElhaney; Shelly A McNeil; Kenneth Rockwood Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Chintan V Dave; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Dae Kim; Michael Fralick; Angela Tong; Elisabetta Patorno Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Melisa L Wong; Stuart M Lichtman; Gary R Morrow; John Simmons; Tomma Hargraves; Cary P Gross; Jennifer L Lund; Lisa M Lowenstein; Louise C Walter; Cara L McDermott; Supriya G Mohile; Harvey Jay Cohen Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Quinn P Hosler; Anthony J Maltagliati; Sandra M Shi; Jonathan Afilalo; Jeffrey J Popma; Kamal R Khabbaz; Roger J Laham; Kimberly Guibone; Dae Hyun Kim Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Elisabetta Patorno; Ajinkya Pawar; Jessica M Franklin; Mehdi Najafzadeh; Anouk Déruaz-Luyet; Kimberly G Brodovicz; Steven Sambevski; Lily G Bessette; Adrian J Santiago Ortiz; Martin Kulldorff; Sebastian Schneeweiss Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Katherine C Lee; Jocelyn Streid; Dan Sturgeon; Stuart Lipsitz; Joel S Weissman; Ronnie A Rosenthal; Dae H Kim; Susan L Mitchell; Zara Cooper Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 5.562