Literature DB >> 30165445

Anti-anginal drugs-beliefs and evidence: systematic review covering 50 years of medical treatment.

Roberto Ferrari1,2, Rita Pavasini1,2, Paolo G Camici3, Filippo Crea4, Nicolas Danchin5, Fausto Pinto6, Athanasios Manolis7, Mario Marzilli8,9, Giuseppe M C Rosano10,11, José Lopez-Sendon12, Kim Fox13.   

Abstract

Chronic stable angina is the most prevalent symptom of ischaemic heart disease and its management is a priority. Current guidelines recommend pharmacological therapy with drugs classified as being first line (beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, short acting nitrates) or second line (long-acting nitrates, ivabradine, nicorandil, ranolazine, and trimetazidine). Second line drugs are indicated for patients who have contraindications to first line agents, do not tolerate them or remain symptomatic. Evidence that one drug is superior to another has been questioned. Between January and March 2018, we performed a systematic review of articles written in English over the past 50 years English-written articles in Medline and Embase following preferred reporting items and the Cochrane collaboration approach. We included double blind randomized studies comparing parallel groups on treatment of angina in patients with stable coronary artery disease, with a sample size of, at least, 100 patients (50 patients per group), with a minimum follow-up of 1 week and an outcome measured on exercise testing, duration of exercise being the preferred outcome. Thirteen studies fulfilled our criteria. Nine studies involved between 100 and 300 patients, (2818 in total) and a further four enrolled greater than 300 patients. Evidence of equivalence was demonstrated for the use of beta-blockers (atenolol), calcium antagonists (amlodipine, nifedipine), and channel inhibitor (ivabradine) in three of these studies. Taken all together, in none of the studies was there evidence that one drug was superior to another in the treatment of angina or to prolong total exercise duration. There is a paucity of data comparing the efficacy of anti-anginal agents. The little available evidence shows that no anti-anginal drug is superior to another and equivalence has been shown only for three classes of drugs. Guidelines draw conclusions not from evidence but from clinical beliefs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30165445     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  10 in total

Review 1.  Recent updates on novel therapeutic targets of cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Muhammad Afzal
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  Nitrates as a Marker of Multiple Co-morbidities and Increased Mortality in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI).

Authors:  Neil Yager; Sunjeev Konduru; Mikhail Torosoff
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-26

3.  Treating angina.

Authors:  Roberto Ferrari; S Censi; A Squeri
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 1.803

4.  [Diagnostics, therapy and the importance of quality of life in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Results oft the general practitioner care study ALTHEA].

Authors:  Ralf Dechend
Journal:  MMW Fortschr Med       Date:  2022-04

Review 5.  A pathophysiological compass to personalize antianginal drug treatment.

Authors:  Edoardo Bertero; Gerd Heusch; Thomas Münzel; Christoph Maack
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Nicorandil: A drug with ongoing benefits and different mechanisms in various diseased conditions.

Authors:  Lamiaa Ahmed Ahmed
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 1.200

7.  2019 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: congratulations and criticism.

Authors:  Roberto Ferrari; Giuseppe Rosano
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother       Date:  2020-09-01

8.  Effectiveness and Tolerability of Trimetazidine 80 Mg Once Daily in Patients with Stable Angina Uncontrolled with Bisoprolol-Based Therapy: The Modus Vivendi Observational Study.

Authors:  Yuri Lopatin; Parvoleta Petrova
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2021-12-27

Review 9.  Post-percutaneous coronary intervention angina: From physiopathological mechanisms to individualized treatment.

Authors:  Leonardo De Luca; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Ilaria Spoletini
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 10.  What Is the Role of Assessing Ischemia to Optimize Therapy and Outcomes for Patients with Stable Angina and Non-obstructed Coronary Arteries?

Authors:  Colin Berry; Andrew J Morrow; Mario Marzilli; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.947

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.