Literature DB >> 30165387

Keel bone damage assessment: consistency in enriched colony laying hens.

Nicholas J Chargo1, Cara I Robison1, Sydney L Baker2,3, Michael J Toscano4, Maja M Makagon2,3, Darrin M Karcher5.   

Abstract

Damage to the keel bone is a major issue in the laying hen industry. The goal of this study was to compare palpation results of live laying hens to digital computed tomography (CT) images, to assess changes in palpation reliability as training and familiarity increased, and to examine keel bone morphology over time. The longitudinal study consisted of 2 trials of 3 observation periods using 40 different (n = 120) W-36 hens housed in enriched colony cages. The first trial began when hens were 52 to 58 wk of age repeating the trial when the same birds were 74 to 81 wk of age. At 52 wk of age, each hen's keel bone was palpated by a single individual for keel bone caudal tip fractures (Tip), sagittal deviations (Evenness), and transverse deviations (Straightness). After palpation, each hen was placed in a motion limiting restraint and scanned using CT. The hens spent the next 21 d in their cages and on day 21, the hens were collected, palpated, and CT scanned again. The CT scans were imported into Mimics analysis software, 3D models of each keel bone were constructed and evaluated. Each bone and 3D model was scored (0, 1, 2) on the measurement of transverse deviation based on <0.5 cm, 0.51 to 1.0 cm, and >1.0 cm total deviation, respectively. Analysis of data using Proc Freq and Means in SAS 9.3 revealed minimal to moderate kappa values and moderate agreement percentages between palpators and digital analysis. The computer generated 3D models of individual keel bones were compared to palpation scores for Tip, Evenness, and Straightness at the beginning and end of each trial. The visual observations of the 3D models were qualitative, performed by a single individual. Overall, we found CT scanning to be a useful tool in observing changes to the keel bone, we observed changes in palpation accuracy as training/familiarity increased, and examined changes in keel morphology, specifically in the tip, after 52 wk of age.
© 2018 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone; computed tomography; enriched colony cage; keel; laying hen

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30165387     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  6 in total

1.  The Reliability and Accuracy of Palpation, Radiography, and Sonography for the Detection of Keel Bone Damage.

Authors:  Linnea M Tracy; S Mieko Temple; Darin C Bennett; Kim A Sprayberry; Maja M Makagon; Richard A Blatchford
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  A tagged visual analog scale is a reliable method to assess keel bone deviations in laying hens from radiographs.

Authors:  Lisa Jung; Christina Rufener; Stefanie Petow
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-18

3.  Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens-Its Relation to Bone Mineral Density, Body Growth Rate and Laying Performance.

Authors:  Christin Habig; Martina Henning; Ulrich Baulain; Simon Jansen; Armin Manfred Scholz; Steffen Weigend
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 4.  Explanations for keel bone fractures in laying hens: are there explanations in addition to elevated egg production?

Authors:  Michael J Toscano; Ian C Dunn; Jens-Peter Christensen; Stefanie Petow; Kathe Kittelsen; Reiner Ulrich
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Research Note: Bone ash from immature broilers correlates to bone mineral content calculated from quantitative computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Abby Pritchard; Cara Robison; Brian D Nielsen
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Keel bone fractures in Danish laying hens: Prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Ida C N Thøfner; Jan Dahl; Jens Peter Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.