Literature DB >> 30165205

A Head-to-Head Analytical Comparison of Cobas 4800 HPV, PapilloCheck HPV Screening, and LMNX Genotyping Kit HPV GP for Detection of Human Papillomavirus DNA in Cervical and Cervicovaginal Swabs.

Hana Jaworek1, Vladimira Koudelakova1, Jiri Drabek1, Jana Vrbkova1, Blazena Zborilova2, Ivana Oborna3, Jana Brezinova4, Radim Marek5, Karel Huml5, Peter Vanek1, Marian Hajduch6.   

Abstract

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection is a cause of cervical cancer development. The addition of hrHPV testing to cervical cancer screening and monitoring of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treatment improves the efficacy of screening and treatment, respectively. Self-sampling for hrHPV testing seems a promising tool for increasing patient participation in cervical cancer screening. In this project, 1198 cervical swabs obtained by physicians and 176 cervicovaginal swabs obtained by self-sampling (not collected in parallel) were analyzed for the presence of 14 hrHPV genotypes using three commercially available assays in comparison. HPV DNA was detected in 21.2% of all samples (21% of cervical swabs and 22.7% of cervicovaginal swabs). The cobas 4800 HPV Test was the most sensitive (0.983) and specific (0.992) for hrHPV detection overall. The PapilloCheck HPV-Screening and LMNX Genotyping Kit HPV GP had comparable specificity with that of the cobas (0.989 and 0.955, respectively), but lesser sensitivity (0.897 and 0.909, respectively). In physician-obtained cervical swabs, the cobas showed the highest sensitivity and specificity (0.980 and 0.994, respectively) for hrHPV detection, whereas in cervicovaginal swabs, the cobas had the highest sensitivity (1.00), but the PapilloCheck had the highest specificity (0.993). In conclusion, all of the detection methods evaluated were highly sensitive and specific for hrHPV detection from both clinician-collected cervical swabs and self-sampled cervicovaginal swabs.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30165205     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  5 in total

1.  Detection of Five Types of HPV Genotypes Causing Anogenital Warts (Condyloma Acuminatum) Using PCR-Tm Analysis Technology.

Authors:  Lixia Wu; Weifeng Wang; Jie Zhang; Xuan Wu; Yan Chen; Xiaoping Gu; Huaqing Shao; Hongsheng Li; Weiwei Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in oocyte donors and women treated for infertility: An observational laboratory-based study.

Authors:  Hana Jaworek; Blazena Zborilova; Vladimira Koudelakova; Jana Brezinova; Jana Vrbkova; Ivana Oborna; Marian Hajduch
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-07-04

3.  NanoString Technology for Human Papillomavirus Typing.

Authors:  Mangalathu S Rajeevan; Sonya Patel; Tengguo Li; Elizabeth R Unger
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Prevalence and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus in Czech non-vaccinated heterosexual couples.

Authors:  Hana Jaworek; Vladimira Koudelakova; Ivana Oborna; Blazena Zborilova; Jana Brezinova; Dagmar Ruzickova; Jana Vrbkova; Pavla Kourilova; Marian Hajduch
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.099

5.  Impact of human papillomavirus infection on semen parameters and reproductive outcomes.

Authors:  Hana Jaworek; Vladimira Koudelakova; Ivana Oborna; Blazena Zborilova; Jana Brezinova; Dagmar Ruzickova; Jana Vrbkova; Pavla Kourilova; Marian Hajduch
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 5.211

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.