Literature DB >> 30165201

3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds: From bone tissue engineering to tumor therapy.

Hongshi Ma1, Chun Feng1, Jiang Chang2, Chengtie Wu3.   

Abstract

Toward the aim of personalized treatment, three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been widely used in bone tissue engineering owing to its advantage of a fast, precise, and controllable fabrication process. Conventional bioceramic scaffolds are mainly used for bone tissue engineering; however, there has been a significant change in the application of bioceramic scaffolds during the past several years. Therefore, this review focuses on 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with different compositions and hierarchical structures (macro, micro, and nano scales), and their effects on the mechanical, degradation, permeability, and biological properties. Further, this review highlights 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds for applications extending from bone tissue regeneration to bone tumor therapy. This review emphasizes recent developments in functional 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with the ability to be used for both tumor therapy and bone tissue regeneration. Considering the challenges in bone tumor therapy, these functional bioceramic scaffolds have a great potential in repairing bone defects induced by surgery and kill the possibly residual tumor cells to achieve bone tumor therapy. Finally, a brief perspective regarding future directions in this field was also provided. The review not only gives a summary of the research developments in bioceramic science but also offers a new therapy strategy by extending multifunctions of traditional biomaterials toward a specific disease. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This review outlines the development tendency of 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds for applications ranging from bone tissue regeneration to bone tumor therapy. Conventional bioceramic scaffolds are mainly used for bone tissue engineering; however, there has been a significant change in the application of bioceramic scaffolds during the past several years. Therefore, this review focuses on 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with different compositions and hierarchical structures (macro, micro, and nano scales), and their effects on the mechanical, degradation, permeability, and biological properties. Further, this review highlights 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds for applications extending from bone tissue regeneration to bone tumor therapy. This review emphasizes recent developments in the functional 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with the ability to be used for both bone tumor therapy and bone tissue regeneration.
Copyright © 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds; Bone tissue regeneration; Composition; Hierarchical structure; Tumor therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30165201     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  50 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Extrusion Printing of Porous Scaffolds Using Storable Ceramic Inks.

Authors:  Luis Diaz-Gomez; Maryam E Elizondo; Panayiotis D Kontoyiannis; Gerry L Koons; Bruno Dacunha-Marinho; Xiang Zhang; Pulickel Ajayan; John A Jansen; Anthony J Melchiorri; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 2.  Cellulose-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and localized drug delivery.

Authors:  Mahsa Janmohammadi; Zahra Nazemi; Amin Orash Mahmoud Salehi; Amir Seyfoori; Johnson V John; Mohammad Sadegh Nourbakhsh; Mohsen Akbari
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-05-26

Review 3.  Bifunctional scaffolds for tumor therapy and bone regeneration: Synergistic effect and interplay between therapeutic agents and scaffold materials.

Authors:  Jiongpeng Yuan; Zhaoyi Ye; Yaoxun Zeng; Zhenxing Pan; ZhenZhen Feng; Ying Bao; Yushan Li; Xujie Liu; Yan He; Qingling Feng
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  Transforming the Degradation Rate of β-tricalcium Phosphate Bone Replacement Using 3-Dimensional Printing.

Authors:  Chen Shen; Maxime M Wang; Lukasz Witek; Nick Tovar; Bruce N Cronstein; Andrea Torroni; Roberto L Flores; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  3D printing applications in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Abid Haleem; Mohd Javaid; Rizwan Hasan Khan; Rajiv Suman
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-14

6.  Fabrication of Polycaprolactone/Nano Hydroxyapatite (PCL/nHA) 3D Scaffold with Enhanced In Vitro Cell Response via Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM).

Authors:  Yong Sang Cho; So-Jung Gwak; Young-Sam Cho
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 7.  Tissue Engineering Through 3D Bioprinting to Recreate and Study Bone Disease.

Authors:  Adriene Pavek; Christopher Nartker; Maamoon Saleh; Matthew Kirkham; Sana Khajeh Pour; Ali Aghazadeh-Habashi; Jared J Barrott
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-05-14

Review 8.  Advances in 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Angelika Zaszczyńska; Maryla Moczulska-Heljak; Arkadiusz Gradys; Paweł Sajkiewicz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Mussel Shell-Derived Macroporous 3D Scaffold: Characterization and Optimization Study of a Bioceramic from the Circular Economy.

Authors:  Stefania Scialla; Francesca Carella; Massimiliano Dapporto; Simone Sprio; Andreana Piancastelli; Barbara Palazzo; Alessio Adamiano; Lorenzo Degli Esposti; Michele Iafisco; Clara Piccirillo
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.118

10.  Influence of Geometry and Architecture on the In Vivo Success of 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Mitchell Hallman; J Adam Driscoll; Ryan Lubbe; Soyeon Jeong; Kevin Chang; Meraaj Haleem; Adam Jakus; Richard Pahapill; Chawon Yun; Ramille Shah; Wellington K Hsu; Stuart R Stock; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.