Literature DB >> 30165188

Rubella virus infections and immune status among pregnant women before the introduction of rubella vaccine in Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia.

Yitayih Wondimeneh1, Moges Tiruneh2, Getachew Ferede3, Birhanu Abera4, Meseret Workineh5, Meseret Birhanie6, Belay Tessema7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rubella and its associated congenital anomalies have been greatly reduced in most developed countries through use of the rubella vaccine. However, the magnitude of the problem is underestimated and there are no well-established rubella/congenital rubella syndrome prevention and control strategies in many developing countries, including Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of rubella virus infections among pregnant women and their immune status before the introduction of rubella vaccine in Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia.
METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among pregnant women in Dessie, Felege-Hiwot, and University of Gondar referral hospitals, from December 2015 to February 2017. After obtaining written informed consent, socio-demographic data, reproductive history, clinical manifestations, and the possible risk factors for rubella virus infections were collected using a structured questionnaire. The laboratory analysis of rubella-specific antibodies was done using an enzyme-linked immunoassay method on venous blood samples. Data were entered and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the strength of association between the dependent variables and covariates.
RESULTS: A total of 600 pregnant women were included in the study. Their mean age was 26.4±5years (range 16-40 years). The overall seroprevalence of rubella infection was 89%. Of the total study participants, 9.5% were positive for rubella-specific IgM antibody, which indicates acute/recent rubella virus infection. In contrast, 79.5% of them had protective levels of rubella-specific IgG antibody and were immune as a result of previous wild-type rubella infection. However, 11% of the pregnant women were negative for both rubella-specific antibodies; these women represent the susceptible group.
CONCLUSIONS: A large number of pregnant women had acute/recent rubella virus infections at the time of data collection, indicating that the virus is endemic in the study area. More than a tenth of pregnant women were found to be susceptible to acquiring the infection in future pregnancies, with the possible risk of rubella-associated congenital anomalies. Hence screening of all women of child-bearing age before conception and during pregnancy might reduce the devastating effects of the virus on the developing fetus.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immune status; Pregnant women; Rubella virus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30165188     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1201-9712            Impact factor:   3.623


  3 in total

1.  The Burden of Likely Rubella Infection among Healthy Pregnant Women in Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria.

Authors:  Uchechukwu Onyeukwu Ekuma; Ogbonnaya Ogbu; Angus Nnamdi Oli; Martin-Luther Oseni Okolo; Peter Anyigor Edeh; Hussein O M Al-Dahmoshi; Sousan Akrami; Morteza Saki
Journal:  Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-31

2.  Seroepidemiology study of Cytomegalovirus and Rubella in pregnant women in Luanda, Angola: geospatial distribution and its association with socio-demographic and clinical-obstetric determinants.

Authors:  Amélia Vueba; Clarissa Faria; Ricardo Almendra; Paula Santana; Maria do Céu Sousa
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  Seroprevalence of rubella virus antibodies among pregnant women in the Center and South-West regions of Cameroon.

Authors:  Nadesh Ashukem Taku; Valantine Ngum Ndze; Emily Abernathy; LiJuan Hao; Diane Waku-Kouomou; Joseph P Icenogle; Samuel Wanji; Jane-Francis K T Akoachere
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.