Literature DB >> 30160980

Assessment of liver fibrosis progression and regression by a serological collagen turnover profile.

Morten A Karsdal1, Sara T Hjuler1, Yi Luo2, Daniel G K Rasmussen1, Mette J Nielsen1, Signe Holm Nielsen1, Diana J Leeming1, Zachary Goodman3, Robert H Arch4, Keyur Patel5, Detlef Schuppan6,7.   

Abstract

There is a need for noninvasive biomarkers that can identify patients with progressive liver fibrosis and monitor response to antifibrotic therapy. An equally important need is identification of patients with spontaneous fibrosis regression, since they may not need treatment nor be included in clinical studies with fibrosis as end point. Circulating biomarkers, originating from defined fragments of the scar tissue itself, may serve as valuable tools for this aspect of precision medicine. We investigated a panel of serological collagen formation and degradation markers to identify patients likely to regress or progress in absence of a therapeutic intervention. Plasma samples from patients with moderate-stage hepatitis C receiving placebo treatment in a phase II trial of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist farglitazar were included. The patients had matched liver biopsies at baseline and 52 wk of follow-up. Serological biomarkers of collagen formation (PRO-C3, PRO-C4, PRO-C5) and collagen degradation (C3M, C4M, and C6M) were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis including PRO-C3 and C6M identified subjects with progressive liver fibrosis with an AUROC of 0.91 ( P < 0.0001) and positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) of 75.0%/88.6%. Low levels of PRO-C5 predicted a spontaneous regression phenotype, with an odds ratio of 33.8 times higher compared with patients with high levels ( P < 0.0025) with an AUROC of 0.78 ( P < 0.0001) and PPV/NPV of 60.0%/95.7%. Two collagen fragments (PRO-C3 and C6M) identified liver fibrosis progressors, and one collagen fragment (PRO-C5) identified liver fibrosis regressors. These biomarkers may improve patient stratification and monitor treatment efficacy in studies with fibrosis as clinical end point. NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY In this study we report two biomarkers of collagen fragments (PRO-C3 and C6M) that are able to identify liver fibrosis progressors while one biomarker (PRO-C5) identified liver fibrosis regressors. In particular, we present three noninvasive biomarkers that can be used to identify patients with progressive liver fibrosis, monitor response to antifibrotic therapy, and also identify the spontaneous liver fibrosis regression phenotype.

Entities:  

Keywords:  basment membrane; biomarker; fibrogenesis; fibrolysis; procollagen; serum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30160980     DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00158.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  13 in total

1.  Comprehensive assessment of ECM turnover using serum biomarkers establishes PBC as a high-turnover autoimmune liver disease.

Authors:  Mette Vesterhus; Mette Juul Nielsen; Johannes Roksund Hov; Francesca Saffioti; Tina Manon-Jensen; Diana Julie Leeming; Bjørn Moum; Kirsten Muri Boberg; Massimo Pinzani; Tom Hemming Karlsen; Morten Asser Karsdal; Douglas Thorburn
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2020-09-03

2.  Cross-Linked Multimeric Pro-Peptides of Type III Collagen (PC3X) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma - A Biomarker That Provides Additional Prognostic Value in AFP Positive Patients.

Authors:  Christina Jensen; Signe Holm Nielsen; Mohammed Eslam; Federica Genovese; Mette Juul Nielsen; Roslyn Vongsuvanh; Raj Uchila; David van der Poorten; Jacob George; Morten Asser Karsdal; Diana Julie Leeming; Nicholas Willumsen
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2020-11-09

Review 3.  Fibrosis Regression After Eradication of Hepatitis C Virus: From Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Don C Rockey; Scott L Friedman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Cellular protein markers, therapeutics, and drug delivery strategies in the treatment of diabetes-associated liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Chien-Yu Lin; Pratik Adhikary; Kun Cheng
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 17.873

5.  Serum markers of type III and IV procollagen processing predict recurrence of fibrosis in liver transplanted patients.

Authors:  Mette Juul Nielsen; Ida Falk Villesen; Natasja Stæhr Gudmann; Diana Julie Leeming; Aleksander Krag; Morten Asser Karsdal; Tim Zimmermann; Detlef Schuppan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Course of Hepatitis C Infection and Response to Anti-viral Therapy in Patients with Thalassemia major and Hepatitis C Infection: A Longitudinal, Prospective Study.

Authors:  Sanaa Kamal; Sara Abdelhakam; Dalia Ghoraba; Mohamed Amer Mohsen; Ahmed Abdel Salam; Hoda Hassan; Leila Nabeigh
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.576

7.  Role of long non‑coding RNAs and related epigenetic mechanisms in liver fibrosis (Review).

Authors:  Niladri Ganguly; Subrata Chakrabarti
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.101

8.  Progressive alcohol-related liver fibrosis is characterised by imbalanced collagen formation and degradation.

Authors:  Maja Thiele; Stine Johansen; Natasja S Gudmann; Bjørn Madsen; Maria Kjaergaard; Mette Juul Nielsen; Diana J Leeming; Suganya Jacobsen; Flemming Bendtsen; Søren Møller; Sönke Detlefsen; Morten Karsdal; Aleksander Krag
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 9.524

9.  Deletion of Protein Kinase D3 Promotes Liver Fibrosis in Mice.

Authors:  Shuya Zhang; Huan Liu; Meimei Yin; Xiuying Pei; Angelika Hausser; Eri Ishikawa; Sho Yamasaki; Zheng Gen Jin
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 17.298

Review 10.  The Roles and Mechanisms of lncRNAs in Liver Fibrosis.

Authors:  Zhi He; Deying Yang; Xiaolan Fan; Mingwang Zhang; Yan Li; Xiaobin Gu; Mingyao Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.