| Literature DB >> 3016044 |
S H Heywang, G Fenzl, D Hahn, I Krischke, M Edmaier, W Eiermann, R Bassermann.
Abstract
Fifty-seven biopsy proven breast masses have been examined at our institution by magnetic resonance (MR), mammography, and ultrasound. The three techniques have been evaluated concerning their capability to visualize the lesion and the diagnostic information obtained. Magnetic resonance proved comparable to mammography and superior to sonography in the fatty to medium dysplastic breasts but inferior to the combined examination by mammography and sonography in the dense breasts. In some selected cases, however, special advantages of MR have been found.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1986 PMID: 3016044 DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198607000-00014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr ISSN: 0363-8715 Impact factor: 1.826